Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I sincerely hope, that Apple will eventually allow the base-level M3 chip to support two external monitors. Currently, only the MacBook Pro supports dual monitors, the MacBook Air M2 only supports one external monitor. The next MacBook Air M3 should really be able to provide this basic feature again. Even the old Intel MBAs supported more external displays. It shall not be a 'Pro'-exclusive feature in 2023.
Apple could add this to the M* series SoC whenever they wanted to. They just don't want to, apparently. :/
 
Can we also get the iconic glowing Apple logo back, please? I wish Apple had never eliminated it from the Mac's. 💻

View attachment 2201864
Optional turn on/off feature for a lit apple logo would be great. Sometimes you don't want to blind the person sitting next to you. However, in the old days it was just a punched hole in the lid and the light came from the backlight diffusor. Nowadays, with the mini-LEDs the apple logo would constantly flash and blink all the time.

If Apple were to put a dedicated screen in the shape of their logo instead, that would make things interesting. Perhaps the logo screen could provide notifications and battery status, just like on an Apple Watch? But only OLED screens are thin enough to consider, they do burn-in and out quickly though. Not really a sustainable feature for an iconic logo. ;)

These days I just put a protective hardshell case onto my MacBook. The iconic logo is covered anyway, which is a good thing, because its shiny surface is a nasty fingerprint magnet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
The 15" MacBook Air most likely won't even come with M3, it'll come with M2 .. at least that's what the rumors say.
Yep, that’s one of the rumors; but it would really be odd to introduce the new M3 SOC and a major new product that doesn’t include the new SOC — so I’m keeping fingers crossed for a positive surprise! 🤞🏽
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Yep, that’s one of the rumors; but it would really be odd to introduce the new M3 SOC and a major new product that doesn’t include the new SOC — so I’m keeping fingers crossed for a positive surprise! 🤞🏽

Sure, but the M3 MBA might not be planned to be released for 4-10 months?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
There are a lot more factors than number of cores.

Is the design more efficient? Does it run at a higher clock (not unlikely, due to the smaller process node)? Is the scheduler more efficient? Is the memory controller faster?
Well it wasn’t in the jump from M1 Pro to M2 Pro. 16% increase even adding 2 efficiency cores was a pretty lame increase.
 
Woo hoo! 36GB unified Memory will be insane 🔥. We need more RAM. I'm tired of seeing this message in 2023.

View attachment 2201846
So I guess you are like me, using open tabs as “webs to check later” for projects. Get Auto Tab Discard extension in Firefox, and set it to X minutes so any tab you aren’t checking often freezes and releases all the memory and CPU used once that time has passed (but it’s still there, and will reload on click). With that you can literally have thousands of open tabs using very little RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
I’m hoping they’ll add hardware based raytracing on those GPUs. I have a lofty dream of gaming on my Mac one day, even if I’m limited in game selection.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Yep, that’s one of the rumors; but it would really be odd to introduce the new M3 SOC and a major new product that doesn’t include the new SOC — so I’m keeping fingers crossed for a positive surprise! 🤞🏽
Right, but I guess we'll have to wait for June's WWDC to find out. I wouldn't be really surprised if it actually came with M2 though, according to what Apple just did with the iPhone 14 series (The base model and the Plus came with last year's chip, A15 Bionic) which was honestly not great. Hope they don't adopt the same strategy with the MacBook family 🫠.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heretiq
Optional turn on/off feature for a lit apple logo would be great. Sometimes you don't want to blind the person sitting next to you. However, in the old days it was just a punched hole in the lid and the light came from the backlight diffusor. Nowadays, with the mini-LEDs the apple logo would constantly flash and blink all the time.

If Apple were to put a dedicated screen in the shape of their logo instead, that would make things interesting. Perhaps the logo screen could provide notifications and battery status, just like on an Apple Watch? But only OLED screens are thin enough to consider, they do burn-in and out quickly though. Not really a sustainable feature for an iconic logo. ;)

These days I just put a protective hardshell case onto my MacBook. The iconic logo is covered anyway, which is a good thing, because its shiny surface is a nasty fingerprint magnet.
Yep I agree, it was cool-looking but at the same time not very practical. Would be cool if it came with an option to turn it off but if OLED display ever came to Macs, it'd probably be a little too complicated to bring it back since it's already hard to do with mini-LED. And in order to make a separate screen for the glowing logo itself, they'd probably have have to make the chassis thicker .. so I don't really have big hopes of bringing it back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heretiq
in order to make a separate screen for the glowing logo itself, they'd probably have have to make the chassis thicker

Ultimately, I think it boils down to exactly that. The 2016 MBPs had lids so thin, using the backlight to light up the Apple logo would’ve caused too much leakage, and using a separate light wouldn’t have been sturdy enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Right, but I guess we'll have to wait for June's WWDC to find out. I wouldn't be really surprised if it actually came with M2 though, according to what Apple just did with the iPhone 14 series (The base model and the Plus came with last year's chip, A15 Bionic) which was honestly not great. Hope they don't adopt the same strategy with the MacBook family 🫠.
I agree @Pinkyyy 💜🍎, M2 is more likely than M3 — just hoping for a delightful surprise! 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
On further reflection, single channel or triple channel memory seems unlikely and apple will continue using two sets of two channels for four total channels.

Perhaps Apple wants to boost the memory configurations a bit to improve value? So instead of 16/32/64/96 we could see 20/36/72/96? There are 6GB LPDDR5 RAM modules.

20GB - 2x6GB + 2x4GB
36GB - 2x12GB + 2x6GB
72GB - 2x24GB + 2x12GB
96GB - 4x24GB
"Cheapest" possible configuration for 36 GB of RAM is 6x6 GB of RAM on a 384 bit bus.

The SOC appears to have 24 GPU cores, total.
 
I’m hoping they’ll add hardware based raytracing on those GPUs. I have a lofty dream of gaming on my Mac one day, even if I’m limited in game selection.

The M series have CPU, GPU and memory in a SoC package. Ray tracing runs extremely hot and if they add that to the package the components all together will start to throttle.

PCs still have the CPU, memory and GPU as separate components so they are not exposed to an SoC overheating.

We will get ray tracing once it can run efficiently.
 
The M series have CPU, GPU and memory in a SoC package. Ray tracing runs extremely hot and if they add that to the package the components all together will start to throttle.

PCs still have the CPU, memory and GPU as separate components so they are not exposed to an SoC overheating.

We will get ray tracing once it can run efficiently.
This is all wrong.
 
Ray tracing runs extremely hot

“ray tracing” is a rendering method, it cannot run. What can “run hot or not” is a concrete hardware implementation. There is no reason why an RT implementation has to “run hot”.

Where did you get this notion anyway? From Nvidia? Because it’s like saying “internal combustion engines are slow because this one company makes a big tractor”

and if they add that to the package the components all together will start to throttle.

We literally have consumer chips that output hundreds of watts of heat. Apple is not nearly close to that. They could increase the power consumption of their SoC by 2x and still be below mainstream desktop CPUs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
Hm, I’m sure that 4x9GB would be significantly cheaper. But 384-bit bus would be obviously faster.
It wouldn't be significantly cheaper considering that there are no 9 GB memory modules.

4, 6, 8, 12, 16 GB per 64 bit module. Thats it. With those memory modules the only possibilities are 6x6, or 3x12, for 36 GB of RAM.

Laughably - the cheaper version is 6x6 GB. And if it is - 384 bit bus for M3 Pro. So expect that 36 is base, and 48 GB and 72 GB are CTO configs.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: jdb8167
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.