Cheers Mike,
Of course, you wouldnt need to add extra thermal pads as your machine is a 2010 version. Mine is a 2009. My bad. Re your RAM, do you have 6x4gb sticks installed, 3 per proc?
Ive also added the Accelsior as my system disk. Im impressed with it so far but slightly disappointed to discover the Barefeats shootout between the Tempo SSD Pro card and the Accelsior. The Tempo beat it across the board though to configure it to match the Accelsior wouldve cost me £50 more, plus the Tempo cant hold a recovery partition.
Thanks.
Hi Upgrader,
I do have 6x4gb sticks installed.
I actually also have both the Accelsior_e2 and the Sonnet Tempo Pro (with 2xSamsung 840 Pro SSDs) in my system. The Accelsior for the boot/OS drive and the Tempo for a video editing scratch drive.
The Tempo is great and does hit the 950MB Read/ 800 Write speeds, but I find it is very inconsistent with the performance for what I am using it for. I'm not really sure why. I do very large HD render writes to it and sometimes, it'll fluctuate down to as low as 300MB Read / 150MB Write. I still haven't figured out why to this day.
I am happy with the Accelsior as a boot drive and I think you made a good choice going that route too.
Hello,
Just wanted to quickly point to this thread regarding fast drives. It's a rapidly evolving field, and the famed XP941 has been decrowned.
Loa
Cheers for letting me know on the RAM thing. Interested to hear about your Sonnet card too. Must be frustrating. Have you spoken to Sonnet? I’m looking at one but can’t afford it so I’ll possibly go for a couple of the XP941 samsung blades with PCIe adaptors. Gonna try working from an old Raptor hard drive first though and see if I can get by ok with that.
1333mhz is the fastest your cpu takes...also remind you that the mac pro is about 5-6 years old and in 2009 1333mhz ram was really goodNow that I've upgraded my Single Processor Mac Pro 5,1
Does anyone know if we are stuck with the 1333 MHz DDR3 ECC Memory as the max speed memory?
I'm under the impression that the speed is limited by the motherboard and the processor as well. Though my friend on the PC side was saying he was surprised that people still used this particular speed of memory lol.
all five bolts are of the same size. maybe it got destroyed somehow at the factory? I have no idea about how you could unscrew without destroying the heatsink...
Both W3690 and X5690 works with 32G RAM in a Mac Pro 5,1.
Hi! i have also upgraded CPU~
Can X5650 dual CPU support 64GB Non ECC Ram like you use Adata?
What model of Ram you are using? I need handle big size raw file and if there is more ram it will much more better!
The hex hole looks perfect...albeit bigger than the rest
Might try another wrench just incase
Like a bubbly Oscar winner I want to thank philipma, Intel, Apple, Arctic Silver, ITCreations and my mother. I am really happy this evening.
AFAIK, yes, and my RAM's part number is AD3U1600W8G11-R.
Hi,
I have a 2010 single cpu MP.
I am attempting to remove the heatsink, but the 5th bolt does not seem to be 3mm!? By 5th bolt I mean the one on its on the left.
My hex wrench fits the other bolts perfectly! But the 5th bolt is a fraction too big! I can see it from either the side or looking down the hole!
Could this bolt be non metric? It isn't 4mm that's for certain.
This was a new machine from direct from Apple and has never been returned for warranty work.
Any ideas?
Cheers.
I've been reading the thread and got me excited looking at bench score as I do video encoding, ripping frequently.
So got me thinking to upgrade my CPU.
I got quad 2.8 and was going to get W3690 but after reading thread, X5690 will work on single CPU system?
It seems X5690 is better than W3690 and would be better choice if the prices are similar which it is nowadays. Am I right?
anyway, my question is will X5690 work on my single CPU MacPro 5,1?
Thanks in advance.
Intel's Part Number Descriptions Explained here:
Intel has changed what the leading Alpha means. The change happened when going from the 35XX (55XX) to the 36XX (56XX) series.
In the older series it meant:
E = Enterprise and CPUs with a TDP of 80 Watts
X = Accelerated and CPUs with a TDP of 95 Watts
W = Workstation and CPUs with a TDP of 130 Watts
and in every case the leading numeric after the alpha meant:
3 = for single CPU use only (1 x I/O Bus)
5 = for dual CPU use, but will work in single CPU applications (2 x I/O Bus)
the the later series, the above nomenclature rules stayed constant EXCEPT - The "X" prefix means accelerated (95 or 130 watt TDP) and is only used on CPUs with a 2 x I/O bus. The "W" prefix is now used only in the single CPU series (1 X I/O Bus).
In any case in both series, the meaning of leading numeric after the alpha has remained the same. A "3" for CPUs with a 1 x I/O bus and a "5" for CPUs with a 2 X I/O Bus.
I hope this makes sense to you. It took me awhile to figure it out.