Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

reklex

macrumors regular
Oct 17, 2021
134
211
Catujal
I’m tempted to start selling something because I’ve come to realize consumers like to get ripped off.
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
This must be April.

16 GB RAM is not enough these days. I made a mistake thinking 16GB is sufficient for my mac mini. Now i m stuck with low performance machine for quite some time and its frustrating.

Anyone working with images/videos/developer needs 32 GB at MINIMUM and if apple thinks 8GB is pro, they are the biggest fools ****ing their customers.
As always, absolute statements are seldom accurate.

There is an almost infinite variation in usage patterns, so blanket statements will never be applicable to all people.

1) MacOS will run very well in 8GB RAM, without using any swap disk, for the kind of modest tasks that a large majority of computer users need. This includes web-browsing (up to say, 20 Safari tabs on typical web-sites), messaging/chats, e-mail, video conferencing, and light programming tasks.

2) If you push it a bit harder, for example with light photo and video editing, you will probably start to use some swap memory, but this can generally be managed by closing down unused applications, and understanding the limitations of the tasks that are possible on the machine.

3) If you use applications whose minimum requirements are close to or exceed your machine's specification, then you are likely to run into resource issues if you need to multi-task with other apps.

An awful lot of people don't need (2) or (3), and will be just fine with 8GB.

Personally, I use a 32GB M1 Max laptop, because I understand my own usage and have been using macOS for nearly 20 years. That said, I just bought a family member a new M2 MacBook Air and chose 8GB/512GB for them; why? because I know that they will probably only have 2 or 3 browser tabs open, play Spotify, and look at (but not edit) some photos and videos. I check out their memory usage when I visit, and have never seen *any* usage of swap memory. 8GB is clearly sufficient, and the correct choice (not over-specifying) for this use case.

Your usage will no doubt be different. You should choose the specification that suits your needs. And just **** about telling anyone else what they *need* when you have no idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6916494

ric22

Suspended
Mar 8, 2022
2,713
2,963
LMAO

Euros. I couldn't give a F what you chaps on the wrong side of the pond pay or what weird currency you use.

Also, the Max Tech brothers are hyperbolic idiots. I'd listen to them for technical tests as much as I'd listen to Mary Poppins for advice on how to circumvent gravity as both are based in fiction.
Anyone think this guy even possesses a passport? It's scary to read such posts.
 

oldmacs

macrumors 601
Sep 14, 2010
4,941
7,182
Australia
What does that look like when it happens? I'd like to know what to look for on my machine.

Everything basically starts to lock up and become super slow - you can check in activity viewer when the memory pressure hits orange or red :)
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
I don't understand how anyone can seriously try to justify shipping a computer with 8gb of memory unless it's like a bargain bin $400 POS. It would be one thing if the large price increase was justified, but it isn't. Any rules about margin are completely made up on Apple's part. Plus, it's not even like the Mac line matters that much to their overall profits, they could likely sell these things at cost and barely affect their revenue.

There is no reason to offer 8gb other than to upsell people the upgrades.
If you want to discuss it as an industry problem, I will be right there with you. Microsoft, Lenovo, Dell, HP, etc they all do this. You can find an 8GB and sometimes even 128GB of SSD still systems for around $900.

But the INSANE hatred Apple gets for this is just ridiculous. Let's discuss it for what it is....and industry problem. And if 99% of the entire industry can get away with $1,000 devices (some are even $2,000!!) with 8GB of RAM and 256GB SSD, then Apple won't be a charity here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Unregistered 4U

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
This must be April.

16 GB RAM is not enough these days. I made a mistake thinking 16GB is sufficient for my mac mini. Now i m stuck with low performance machine for quite some time and its frustrating.

Anyone working with images/videos/developer needs 32 GB at MINIMUM and if apple thinks 8GB is pro, they are the biggest fools ****ing their customers.
For me 64GB is not enough anymore. So we just shouldn't sell any computers less than 96GB.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Unregistered 4U

magbarn

macrumors 68040
Oct 25, 2008
3,018
2,385
If you want to discuss it as an industry problem, I will be right there with you. Microsoft, Lenovo, Dell, HP, etc they all do this. You can find an 8GB and sometimes even 128GB of SSD still systems for around $900.

But the INSANE hatred Apple gets for this is just ridiculous. Let's discuss it for what it is....and industry problem. And if 99% of the entire industry can get away with $1,000 devices (some are even $2,000!!) with 8GB of RAM and 256GB SSD, then Apple won't be a charity here.
The biggest difference is that the majority have windows laptops are fully or partially upgradeable with industry standard parts. You gotta sell your Mac system if you find out you skimped on ram. Which I’m now on planning to do with my wife’s mba once the m3 version comes out. (What’s frustrating is that Apple resellers that tend to have much better discounts than Apple Store 99% of the time tend to only sell the stock models and not BTO so you’re forced to pay more)
My wife hits the 8gb limit on her mba m1 with regular day to day use as a realtor. I assumed she would be fine with 8, but I didn’t realize how many browser tabs she keeps open while showing clients and her mba will start to beachball and become slow. “Honey, I thought you said the new Apple “brain” is a lot better than the Intel one?” She had a 2016 MacBook Pro 13 with 16gb previously and I bought into the apple silicon 8gb memory is better than Intel 16gb memory hype when these were first released.
 

henkie

macrumors regular
Aug 30, 2023
162
281
I'm sitting here browsing the web with 5GB. On occasion I have to be careful with Chrome as if I load too many YouTube tabs my Mac will stall for some seconds (usually) but not so much in Firefox.

Of course people will browse the web just fine with 8GB.

You lot just want to whine.

Or, the reality is you are complaining because the price of Apple is more than you have.

In that case then just go build yourself a tiny box PC built around some low cost AMD processor. All sorts of hobbyist boxes can be built for less than $500. Do yourself a favor and go do that.
Lol, I hope you are sarcastic. A laptop of 2000 euro would hit swap while just doing some browsing. And that is okay for some people. Some here really like being within the Apple distortion field.
And by the way, the base M3 MBP is already on sale: https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...or-discounts-at-up-to-200-off-update.2409746/ those 8GB must be selling well….Again: nobody wants those gimped mbps.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
The biggest difference is that the majority have windows laptops are fully or partially upgradeable with industry standard parts. You gotta sell your Mac system if you find out you skimped on ram. Which I’m now on planning to do with my wife’s mba once the m3 version comes out. (What’s frustrating is that Apple resellers that tend to have much better discounts than Apple Store 99% of the time tend to only sell the stock models and not BTO so you’re forced to pay more)
My wife hits the 8gb limit on her mba m1 with regular day to day use as a realtor. I assumed she would be fine with 8, but I didn’t realize how many browser tabs she keeps open while showing clients and her mba will start to beachball and become slow. “Honey, I thought you said the new Apple “brain” is a lot better than the Intel one?” She had a 2016 MacBook Pro 13 with 16gb previously and I bought into the apple silicon 8gb memory is better than Intel 16gb memory hype when these were first released.
Then frame the conversation about upgradability instead of "no pro computer should SELL at 8GB of RAM and 256GB of SSD". Upgradeability is not part of the conversation because a LOT of the industry is "selling" at those same specs.
 

mode11

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2015
1,452
1,172
London
The biggest difference is that the majority have windows laptops are fully or partially upgradeable with industry standard parts. You gotta sell your Mac system if you find out you skimped on ram.
This.

The issue is that Apple laptops have low base RAM / storage, are very expensive to spec up at purchase, and you have no opportunity to add either later. Sure, the pragmatic solution for many is to just buy the base model, then keep an eye on how many tabs they have open / the size of their photo library etc., but it isn't ideal.

Ultimately, Apple products are expensive. Its just up to the individual to decide whether they represent good value or not (taking into account resale value too).
 

mode11

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2015
1,452
1,172
London
Then frame the conversation about upgradability instead of "no pro computer should SELL at 8GB of RAM and 256GB of SSD". Upgradeability is not part of the conversation because a LOT of the industry is "selling" at those same specs.

Of course upgradeability is part of the conversation. If MacBooks were upgradeable, this conversation would be moot. If Apple still insisted on massively overcharging for upgrades, you'd just take a trip to crucial.com after ordering a base laptop.

It's not just that Apple charges extortionate upgrade prices, it also prevents you from taking advantage of continually falling RAM / SSD prices by upgrading later. Plus, you have to guess your needs potentially years down the line, which is difficult, so there's an incentive to over-spec. Apple knows all of this, of course, which is why they do it.
 
  • Love
Reactions: bcortens

opeter

macrumors 68030
Aug 5, 2007
2,709
1,619
Slovenia

How can Apple sell a Mac with 8GB of RAM in 2023 and call it "Pro"​


The answer is: because they can™.

IMO, they can crank up the entry price of the basic Macbook Pros with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB SSD to 5000 and you will still find naive people who will buy it. Even if they have to take out a loan or sell a kidney.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
Of course upgradeability is part of the conversation. If MacBooks were upgradeable, this conversation would be moot. If Apple still insisted on massively overcharging for upgrades, you'd just take a trip to crucial.com after ordering a base laptop.

It's not just that Apple charges extortionate upgrade prices, it also prevents you from taking advantage of continually falling RAM / SSD prices by upgrading later. Plus, you have to guess your needs potentially years down the line, which is difficult, so there's an incentive to over-spec. Apple knows all of this, of course, which is why they do it.

How can Apple sell a Mac with 8GB of RAM in 2023 and call it "Pro"

That is the topic at hand. NOT "Why aren't Apple computers upgradeable". Its SELL. Lenovo, Dell, HP also SELL "Pro" systems with 8GB and 256GB of storage.

Also, Microsoft Surface devices are NOT easily upgradeable.

Also, performing RAM and SSD upgrades isn't necessarily a "pro" thing. Its enthusiasts. More gamers are likely to upgrade their computer than a professional. When you are stick with buying 50 laptops all $2,000 each that come with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of SSD, you don't buy those and plan to upgrade the RAM immediately. And most businesses I have worked at and most of my clients now have a strict "no upgrade" policy as it makes support exponentially more difficult. Many of them have the SAME SYSTEM in storage, usually 5-10 of them on hand to swap out a faulty system at any moment.

And when you are dealing with the $8,000+ per unit costs for 50 or 100 of them, you have that in the IT budget and mark that as a capital expense. You plan for the next 3-5 years whenever your upgrade cycle is and expect RAM and storage growth AT PURCHASE time. It's easier for budgeting and financing. Upgrading RAM immediately or a year later makes things exponentially more difficult in so many ways.
 
Last edited:

mode11

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2015
1,452
1,172
London
How can Apple sell a Mac with 8GB of RAM in 2023 and call it "Pro"

That is the topic at hand. NOT "Why aren't Apple computers upgradeable". Its SELL. Lenovo, Dell, HP also SELL "Pro" systems with 8GB and 256GB of storage.

Also, Microsoft Surface devices are NOT easily upgradeable.

No-one's asking why Apple computers aren't upgradeable; the answer to that one is obvious.

Which 'Pro' Dell system comes with 8GB of RAM? Taking a quick look on the Dell site for roughly comparable machines, a 13" / i7-1250U XPS for £1050 comes with 16GB RAM; a 15.6" / i7-13700H / RTX 4050 XPS for £1500 also comes with 16GB - https://www.dell.com/en-uk/shop/laptops-2-in-1-pcs/sr/laptops/xps?appliedRefinements=37868. And both have 512GB SSDs, for the record.

Any 8GB 'Pro' machine is an insult; it would just be less consequential if the RAM could be upgraded after the fact, as with any normal laptop (apart from your cherry-picked Surface).
 
  • Like
Reactions: opeter

hans1972

macrumors 68040
Apr 5, 2010
3,760
3,403
Why would anybody be happy to be charged $500 for an extra 8GB of RAM?

Those people who complains about the base configuration without mentioning the price. If price is important why not say something like this instead

"I want the base model to come with 16Gb of RAM and be $200 cheaper". ?
 

dmr727

macrumors G4
Dec 29, 2007
10,667
5,765
NYC
Any 8GB 'Pro' machine is an insult; it would just be less consequential if the RAM could be upgraded after the fact, as with any normal laptop (apart from your cherry-picked Surface).

Dell's XPS 13 isn't a normal laptop? Both memory and SSD soldered down, and 8GB options on the low end. Think it's stupid there too, but certainly not specific to Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slix

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
Which 'Pro' Dell system comes with 8GB of RAM?

dmr727 already pointed it out.

Dell's XPS 13 isn't a normal laptop? Both memory and SSD soldered down, and 8GB options on the low end. Think it's stupid there too, but certainly not specific to Apple.

Yep! And Lenovo and HP. Like I said, let's have this discussion for the IT industry not just Apple please.

I have posted examples on dozens of these threads. Just spend 5 minutes googling and you can find all your answers as to "What products have 8GB of RAM?"

Look I don't think anyone would deny wanting to spend less for more. But these rants are getting far too ridiculous. I would certainly like NVIDIA GPUs to be affordable again, not $1,700 for the 4090. Who would say "Nah" to get a Mac Pro with 192GB of RAM for only $3,000? But honestly, if the price of the RAM upgrade is too much for you, you shouldn't be buying these products anyway. I make up what I spent and more on TWO Ultra Mac Studios MAXED in one month.

This is why I say I bet most of the complaining is from enthusiasts and not big professionals. By the time I need to upgrade my RAM it is best to buy a whole new computer. It will help in dozens of more ways than more RAM alone would do. Like I said, I fell into this trap with the 2010 Mac Pro I kept that going WAY TOO LONG and my 2019 i9 iMac even with the same RAM amount was LEAGUES faster. And just to see what I was missing out on, I tried out a colleague's 2016 15" MacBook Pro and that was faster than my 2010 Mac Pro too. And that had LESS RAM!
 
Last edited:

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
No, you shouldn't be allowed. It gets boring after a while when it happens every time Apple release a new Mac.
It's been happening for decades. I didn't start browsing these forums regularly until the Intel days, but even the PPC days I heard just complaints about it.
 

hans1972

macrumors 68040
Apr 5, 2010
3,760
3,403
Worth it is both subjective and different to reasonable. Apple’s pricing and stock and customizable configuration options can be “worth it” while simultaneously being unreasonable.

Almost everything I buy, is because it provides value, i.e. it's worth it.
If something is worth it, then it isn't unreasonable.

You seem to divide a Mac into its parts instead and trying to calculate the marginal price of getting extra parts. You'll be a very unhappy Apple customer when you do this.

I just look at the whole, consider the value and the price for the Mac I want or need, and buys it or not.

Makes me a much happier Apple customer than you.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.