Everyone has their own share of the blood that leads to total disaster.Consumers gonna consume…then turn around and complain about how corporations are destroying society. (They are, but only as long as we keep buying their products endlessly)
Everyone has their own share of the blood that leads to total disaster.Consumers gonna consume…then turn around and complain about how corporations are destroying society. (They are, but only as long as we keep buying their products endlessly)
Oh please! Macs are made of recycled aluminum. We are actually helping the planet…… right? 🤔Consumers gonna consume…then turn around and complain about how corporations are destroying society. (They are, but only as long as we keep buying their products endlessly)
For myself, there are always niggling issues that need resolving, even on my Mac mini with Studio Display, that never reared their heads on my iMacs. My 2014 iMac 5K is the first computer I kept for its entire OS cycle lifetime because it was the first computer that felt great to use every day for nearly eight years. Its EOL macOS support and feeling a bit sluggish arrived around the same time…Genuine question: why the desire for an all-in-one? What's the specific draw vs just having a Mac mini + a nice 27" 5K display?
I plan on (i.e., budget money for) 3-4 as that's a realistic expectation before some form of hardware failure or battery degradation... 5 years really is pushing it imho.
Of course internal storage has its own advantages that external cannot match. However it requires good planning (and $$) when buying a new box. If one failed to put sufficient internal storage (I recommend 2x what one needs initially) into a box, the short term solution is to offload least-used files to external drives. The internal boot drive should be maintained at no more than ~80% full.Internal storage has its own advantage that external cannot match, such as higher stability and same portability as your computer. I am fully aware of external storage. But that can’t satisfy the need to expand internal storage permanently.
Yup. My 2016 MBP still works fine except that a full workload overdrives the RAM, so I got an M2 MBP with 96 GB RAM. I still use the 2016 box for casual web surfing.As long as possible if the machine works! I'm currently still using my LAte 2013 MBP. It still does everything I need, but has finally dropped out of being able to run some of the software I needed. The Versions I'm on still work flawlessly, but there are new features I want that tax the system too much now.
I went backward. I have an M2-Pro Mini. But I just bought a 2014 Intel Mini. I run it headless (no keyboard or monitor) and it runs some lightweight servers 24x7. It is so much better for that use case then using an old PC Tower with Linux. Aple's screen sharing works very well between the older 2014 and my new Mini.With Apple silicone now available for three years, is it a feasible option to upgrade yearly or maybe every other year? The specs and design upgrades are minimal, so how long do you plan to stick with your current devices before considering an upgrade?
What I have learnt from this thread. Many Apple users upgrade every cycle and wear that like a badge of honour. The reality is they only use their device for Netflix and porn.
Between the box upgrade, the “short term“ solution can end up being more permanent than it looks. I used to think 1TB internal was more than enough compared to my old 128GB, but nope. And I find myself needing to have 8TB internal storage but no immediate need for powerful processor Or substantially more RAM, yet got dragged on anyways Because it’s Apple. At this rate, I could need some 32TB of internal storage that can cost 10 grand a decade down the line, which is just absurd. Offloading least-used files to external is certainly a good idea and I have been doing for some time, but still, the demand projection is not looking great For my wallet.Of course internal storage has its own advantages that external cannot match. However it requires good planning (and $$) when buying a new box. If one failed to put sufficient internal storage (I recommend 2x what one needs initially) into a box, the short term solution is to offload least-used files to external drives. The internal boot drive should be maintained at no more than ~80% full.
Pretty much bang on.3-5 years is my usual target as well. 3 if there's something amazing I want. 4 years in normal times. 5 years if I'm waiting for something.
Although this is a little off topic, butterfly keyboards were never an issue for us. I had a 12" which I gave to my daughter and which still functions today as a grand daughter plaything and my wife and I both had 2017 15" MBPros which never failed us (they were replaced in 2019). I did not like the short key stroke but otherwise they worked fine and travelled around the world with us. It would seem that most of the people who post on this site and a good portion of the buying public do not share this experience which I find intriguing, however it remains to me that the butterfly design was a poor keyboard, not because of its failure rate but because of its the poor feel.Pretty much bang on.
I managed to avoid the butterfly debacle by pushing my 2015 13" to 2020. It's still doing duty as a secondary machine around the house I don't need to care too much about. So glad I avoided the butterfly keyboards though, a friend returned 4 12" MacBooks due to keyboard problems before giving up and going back to a 13" Pro before they got ruined with it too.
My shortest upgrade was 12 months - I handed off the early 2020 intel 13" air (massive disappointment that thing on paper, quad core vs. dual core and 16GB ram vs. 8 GB but was meh "upgrade") that replaced my 2015 13" Pro during covid to the gf to upgrade to apple silicon.
Fair question, to be sure. And your excellent and thoughtful suggestion may be the path for me going forward. I like AIO computers as they are an easy buy. One box, does everything, and does it very, very well. No cables for the ”computer” itself, one electrical plug, known experience (my 2017 iMac is my 3rd), easy configuration, one warranty, one AppleCare charge, small desktop footprint, and lower overall cost. At a desired config for the mini, it is $1500, plus $1600 for the display so $3100 plus taxes, AppleCare X2 ($150 + $99) for another $250.Genuine question: why the desire for an all-in-one? What's the specific draw vs just having a Mac mini + a nice 27" 5K display?
Is a third party display out of the question? I get it can be nice to buy straight from Apple, but there are a few 5K 27" displays available from LG (the UltraFine) and Samsung (ViewFinity S9) that are around $975 and $1200, respectively. That's at least $400 in savings right there - although admittedly still several hundred more than the ideal iMac.On the other hand, a well-configured one costs $2100 plus tax plus AppleCare for $170, so major savings over the mini/studio display combo. If I can learn to live with the 23.5” display, the savings will buy a lot of nice wine to help me transition more easily.
Don't have personal experience with the machines as I never owned one, but this friend of mine (not internet friend, friend I've known and see regularly for the past 20 years) went through 5 machines in like 3 months. The shortest time to replacement was about a week.It would seem that most of the people who post on this site and a good portion of the buying public do not share this experience which I find intriguing, however it remains to me that the butterfly design was a poor keyboard, not because of its failure rate but because of its the poor feel.
No, it isn’t, and thanks for suggesting this with on-target options. It then becomes a question of AIO vs. size. If size wins, 3rd-party display plus mini could win out. If AIO wins, the 23.5” iMac could be the choice. I’m obviously conflicted, but postponing any decision for as long as I’m still comfortable with my 2017 iMac, and it continues to function.Is a third party display out of the question?