Same here. The cellular modem was weak. Do you have a mesh router? That solved all of my work issues.The intel modems in them sucked for the cellular connectivity but never had any other issues with my xs max.
Same here. The cellular modem was weak. Do you have a mesh router? That solved all of my work issues.The intel modems in them sucked for the cellular connectivity but never had any other issues with my xs max.
Maybe is it’s foldable, is my reason to upgrade but it would be a flimsy excuse. The Pro from 2018 have been perfect for me. It’s hard to top it. I’ll even change the battery life later on when that becomes an issue. Maybe is the screen stops working it’s a good time to upgrade.And this is the smart thing to do, upgrading for the sake of incremental improvements that won't change your day to day use of it is, to me, is like throwing cash away.
Me personally, I won't update until there's a significant feature to make it worth it, or OS updates have ceased. So I went from an iPad OG 9.7 Pro to a 2020 iPad Pro.. 4-5 years? And really I did it only for the bigger screen size.
Maybe they don’t want to waste apple employees time plus potential to ruin the iPad and them having to for the bill. Just my guess.Do you bother with battery replacements?
Or is the short battery life because the newer OS is too draining?
I’ve found that it can be either. My older iPhone on the newest iOS has terrible battery life now, even though the battery was replaced not that long ago. I hate that Apple doesn’t let people revert iOS versions.
But other times poor battery life can be solved with a simple battery replacement. The only problem is Apple seems almost reluctant to replace batteries even when people want to pay for it. I.e. why in the world does the device need to pass their proprietary battery test first if we’re paying?
I’ve never bothered with a battery replacement. If I approached them and they refused, I wouldn’t accept that. If I’m paying for it, then I’m getting it lol.Do you bother with battery replacements?
Or is the short battery life because the newer OS is too draining?
I’ve found that it can be either. My older iPhone on the newest iOS has terrible battery life now, even though the battery was replaced not that long ago. I hate that Apple doesn’t let people revert iOS versions.
But other times poor battery life can be solved with a simple battery replacement. The only problem is Apple seems almost reluctant to replace batteries even when people want to pay for it. I.e. why in the world does the device need to pass their proprietary battery test first if we’re paying?
Yeah, the elephant in the room is the fact that it’s just not in Apple’s best interest (profit-wise) to do battery replacements, even if it‘s the most beneficial course of action for the customer. One could suggest that Apple charge whatever price would make it actually worth Apple’s time, but of course that would mean basically matching the profit of a new iPad sale (the sale they would lose if a customer replaces the battery instead). But this would then make a battery replacement so expensive that it probably wouldn’t be worth it to the customer to do. It would also give Apple a terrible public image for making battery replacements prohibitively expensive. And handing battery replacements off to third party vendors doesn’t help either, because Apple still loses the new iPad sale.Maybe they don’t want to waste apple employees time plus potential to ruin the iPad and them having to for the bill. Just my guess.
If I were to consider a battery replacement on a 3-4 year old iPad, I probably wouldn’t go to Apple for it. My step mum was quoted £99 to replace her iPad Mini battery, yet a local repairer did it for £40. If the product is within warranty I’d use Apple but definitely not when that has expired.Yeah, the elephant in the room is the fact that it’s just not in Apple’s best interest (profit-wise) to do battery replacements, even if it‘s the most beneficial course of action for the customer. One could suggest that Apple charge whatever price would make it actually worth Apple’s time, but of course that would mean basically matching the profit of a new iPad sale (the sale they would lose if a customer replaces the battery instead). But this would then make a battery replacement so expensive that it probably wouldn’t be worth it to the customer to do. It would also give Apple a terrible public image for making battery replacements prohibitively expensive. And handing battery replacements off to third party vendors doesn’t help either, because Apple still loses the new iPad sale.
A little rant here, but point being, Apple doesn’t really want people replacing batteries, even though it is the fiscally and environmentally responsible thing to do (assuming deteriorated battery life is the only issue a customer has with their device). They and a lot of tech companies count on the unnecessary waste of resources/environment/people‘s money. A couple years ago, Tim Cook explained in a shareholders meeting that iPhone sales were down because of a big surge in battery replacements due to its temporarily reduced price. People during that year were happy with their iPhones that ran like new, didn’t spend a lot, and in some year in the future there will be a big downtick in environment waste due to iPhones. The only one to lose out was Apple’s bankroll. So their (and many companies’) business model is directly at odds with financial and environmental responsibility (though they make up for some of the damage with their environmental efforts). It’s this dependency on irresponsibility that to me is a huge problem with consumer electronics today.
With the current Apple policy, it takes several years (probably 4-5 five of either intense use or poor battery care) for a battery to achieve a status of "eligible for replacement". By that time, they count on the fact that your product is starting to be old enough for replacement, except it's a very "future proof iPad". Older iPads were not very future proof, but they are now becoming more and more future proof...Yeah, the elephant in the room is the fact that it’s just not in Apple’s best interest (profit-wise) to do battery replacements, even if it‘s the most beneficial course of action for the customer. One could suggest that Apple charge whatever price would make it actually worth Apple’s time, but of course that would mean basically matching the profit of a new iPad sale (the sale they would lose if a customer replaces the battery instead). But this would then make a battery replacement so expensive that it probably wouldn’t be worth it to the customer to do. It would also give Apple a terrible public image for making battery replacements prohibitively expensive. And handing battery replacements off to third party vendors doesn’t help either, because Apple still loses the new iPad sale.
A little rant here, but point being, Apple doesn’t really want people replacing batteries, even though it is the fiscally and environmentally responsible thing to do (assuming deteriorated battery life is the only issue a customer has with their device). They and a lot of tech companies count on the unnecessary waste of resources/environment/people‘s money. A couple years ago, Tim Cook explained in a shareholders meeting that iPhone sales were down because of a big surge in battery replacements due to its temporarily reduced price. People during that year were happy with their iPhones that ran like new, didn’t spend a lot, and in some year in the future there will be a big downtick in environment waste due to iPhones. The only one to lose out was Apple’s bankroll. So their (and many companies’) business model is directly at odds with financial and environmental responsibility (though they make up for some of the damage with their environmental efforts). It’s this dependency on irresponsibility that to me is a huge problem with consumer electronics today.
Yes, for iPads it probably usually takes several years for a battery to need replacing or rather pass Apple’s battery test (for my iPhone it has taken a year). Though like you said, iPads should last even longer if one wants. For me, I only want to upgrade if I want new features, or reluctantly if I need to maintain compatibility with critical apps, but I never want to upgrade because of battery life. If that’s the only reason, I’d always want to just replace the battery.With the current Apple policy, it takes several years (probably 4-5 five of either intense use or poor battery care) for a battery to achieve a status of "eligible for replacement". By that time, they count on the fact that your product is starting to be old enough for replacement, except it's a very "future proof iPad". Older iPads were not very future proof, but they are now becoming more and more future proof...
I had this dilemma with 2 of my iPads, my mini 4 and first gen pro 12.9 (all the other, including the oldest ones have very little battery wear), both 5 years old.
My 12.9 cost me almost $1000 back then (128GB model), plus I had invested in pencil, smart keyboard, smart cover and other third party accessories. And it still works amazingly well for its age, as this was one of the most future proof iPads ever made (first iPad to get pencil and smart keyboard, now available throughout the line, as well as quad speaker and big size, still pro only, and a few more perks such as USB 3.0 and variable refresh rate, though limited to 60hz). So it was a no brainer paying $100 and getting a new one.
The mini 4 cost me around $500 (64GB model) and, while still supported, is much, much slower. It has no pencil support and is my "bed device".
For this one it does feel expensive to pay $100, as it has very little resell value... So probably not worth it...
Yes, for iPads it probably usually takes several years for a battery to need replacing or rather pass Apple’s battery test (for my iPhone it has taken a year). Though like you said, iPads should last even longer if one wants. For me, I only want to upgrade if I want new features, or reluctantly if I need to maintain compatibility with critical apps, but I never want to upgrade because of battery life. If that’s the only reason, I’d always want to just replace the battery.
I’ve got the 2018 model, I had the 2017 one... and I was dead set on keeping that one too. I wanted to avoid looking at that new design, because I knew it would tempt me to buying one. I waited only about a month or so and I caved.I’m still using my 2017 12.9” iPad Pro. I think I will upgrade to this years model tho, especially if they are putting Mini LED into it.
I have the disorder where I see a new iPad ... realize it isn't enough justification for me to upgrade... see family without an iPad, offer them my iPad for 50% or less (with tons of accessories), then justify buying a new iPad.
I've gone through so many iPads this way... Apple loves me.
The gen 2 12.9 was my first iPad personally. I'm currently waiting for an express replacement at which point this will be my 3rd copy of the gen 2. I hope to be able to sell it when the next generation comes out as I am not too keen on seeing if this 3rd gen 2 device develops touch sensitivity issues too. For me if it weren't for the potential for touch screen issues I'd hold off on upgrading until hardware differentiation forces me to.
The 2nd gen iPP is still a fantastic device and does everything I use it for well (which is general browsing, content consumption and light note taking). If I were a heavier user that taxed the device more I'd probably upgrade every other year but to be honest there wasn't much differentiation in performance between 2018 and 2020 versions to justify the expense so I dunno . .