So far I have yet to use a Mouse with my Surface Book as I find the track pad being near identical to my Mac`s, I would say Apple may have the edge on gestures, equally I have not looked at the Surface Book trackpad settings in detail. To date the Surface Book`s trackpad has been excellent and with the added layer of input via "Touch" I have a
Lenovo Bluetooth mouse for detail work once I have the need and a
SwiftPointGT which very well suited to long sessions and allows access to touch centric commands via mousing input, takes a little getting used to. I fully expect the Surface Book mousing experience to be fluid same as any other well specified Windows 10 system.
Wifi is solid, being significantly faster than any of my current Mac`s used professionally; 2015 rMB, 2014 13" rMBP & 2012 15" rMBP. Mac`s have and continue to be problematic regarding WiFi connectivity. As I work and travel globally it`s physically impossible for me to control the WiFi environment my systems connect to. At the extreme end of the spectrum is the flat inability to connect to a known network, requiring need to use a
portable router as a repeater, or resort to a wired solution. In general a slower than the norm experience is my expectation on a Mac. Surface Book streams 4K video effortlessly over my VPN, none of my Mac`s can achieve anything close to this wireless performance, same applies to large file downloads, the Mac`s will be slower and more prone to disconnections.
So far I have been using the Surface Book in isolation, more focusing on setting it up and absorbing the details. I don't anticipate any issue with an external display, at most I may need to adjust the individual display scaling. My current external is also due for replacement, so I will be looking at one to complement the Surface Book shortly.
I am keenly interested to see what Microsoft does with the Surface Book, the new Surface Dial is something I can also take advantage of, so will be getting the Surface Dial on release. Surface Book 2 will likely address the gap on the hinge etc. upgraded CPU/dGPU, some talk of Quad Core CPU option, USB C/TB-3. Given the recent release of the Performance Base it`s very clear that Microsoft is listening to it`s customers and not solely chasing thin for the sake of being thinner; doubling graphic performance and significantly extending battery runtime at the cost of some increase in thickness & weight in the base.
Surface Book`s additional vertical display real estate is noticeable and very welcome, being vastly more practical than the far more common 16:9 aspect rations, Pixel Sense display is superb; Some very slight light bleed at the top of the display, at maximum brightness with a solid black background, both points are equidistant so very likely the light source. Difficult split between the rMb & Surface Book for the best display, both are extremely competent; Surface Book deals with black levels & white saturation better when direct compared on lagom.nl/lcd-test, colour is a wash pardon the pun, Surface Book overall has the edge.
Newer Mac`s win outright on the speaker side, the Surface Book`s audio is crisp & clear, may distort at maximum volume (not tried). The rMB has a more full bodied sound field, with the rMB being the winner. For my needs the Surface Book is adequate and much better than one would expect given such a thin device, besting many others; when working I always travel with a
B&O A1 or A2 so the built in speakers are less of a consideration.
Is the Surface Book perfect? No, no portable is, as by very nature compromises must be made, however the Surface Book brings a great deal of usability, utility & flexibility to the table, for my needs far less compromised than the 2016 MBP`s, which in reality offer some nice touches over the 2015 MBP`s, however coupled with the diminishment in OS stability and general lack of focus on productivity in macOS, switching to the Surface Book was an easy decision.
I depend on my hardware for my living, therefore it "must" be relevant & current, in many serious engineering streams Apple`s Wireless & USB C only world is little more than a pipe dream. As for, comparing a touch enabled dynamic hot key bar to displays that are fully Touch & Pen enabled, no just no, even Steve Job`s famous
Reality Distortion Field fails miserably to generate one iota of the suspension of disbelief required to think this paradigm is remotely believable...
Dongles requiring "logic""are the very last thing you want, as people are already finding that "all dongles are not equal"; with absolute certainty my 2015 rMB & 2016 Samsung TabPro s muti-port adaptors are not interchangeable, yet both are USB C. This now represents a nightmare for the consumer with the only certain path being to buy directly from the manufacturer of the device, at whatever the price. Dongles & adaptors are little more than another revenue stream for Apple; being now near mandatory, lost requiring replacement, coupled with very significant margins and we will be stuck with them for years to come, unless you have the luxury of 100% control of your computing environment.
What Apple doesn't get is that frequently the professional user is a catalyst for many other sales; bottom line is if I don't "buy" into the Mac, nor will my business, family & some friends. I was recently speaking to a friend of mine who is a professional designer, her first words were expressing interest in the upcoming Studio and she has used Mac`s exclusively for years, and so it spreads
Core Rot...
Q-6