Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You’re about 5 years too late with the apple is doomed meme. It’s true apple could implode, but it’s also true a meteor can hit the earth and wipe out life. It’s also true Microsoft can go under. It’s true anything can happen.
Almost did under Steve Ballmer. He was the first rate example of an incompetent leader until someone surpassed him 2016. MS had smartphones, touchscreens, smartwatches and plenty of other "next big thing" tech years before Apple or Google, but Ballmer killed them. What he thought of the iPhone in 2007 says it all. Now they're playing catch up on those areas. If MS had a competent CEO at the time, they could have been the biggest dog in the smartphone market today.
 
Steve is the past, Apple, profits, profits and profits are the only future. Accept it and keep buying.
 
Do you have some stats on what "more repairable" really means?
Ifixit
In the meatime according to this they are studying the issue. It's going to take years to act on it. By that time, Apple may have surpassed them. (whataboutism, I know)
At least they have shifted side, just took shareholder’s demanding it. Apple has been vocal against it. so we all welcome it if they come out on top
xbox is not carried around and used the same way as a personal computer or phone. It can afford to be boxy and easy to open.
iMac, Mac mini, Mac Pro? The Xbox went from terrible to great, but the stationary options went from great to terrible for no concrete benefits. (Except the backtracking on the Mac Pro thank god)
Don't know what this means.
Installing custom games and programs such as emulators if you activate developer mode.
Bravo for windows store, maybe Epic will see their vbucks for $0.
Well they are selling them for free. So yes.
It's possible that the revenue model between Microsoft and Apple may be different. Of course when one talks about attack vectors and security, Microsofts' open model is correlated to the ease of attack vectors.
Perhaps, but if everyone uses the windows store it will improve the security without removing consumer choice. And developers are incentivized to exist in the windows store as well
Does Microsoft provide all of the services that Apple does? You may argue some devs don't want those services, however, that is a platform decision one makes when giving Apple their $99.
Yes they offer the same services almost 1 to 1. Perhaps some differences such as no windows phone for obvious reasons.
Apple has SBS.
Is this apple small businesses program? Considering apple takes 15% below 1 million on all programs, but microsofts takes 5% on every program irrespective of revenue. And games have 12% irrespective of revenue. And IAP 3d party solutions have 0% commission So perhaps not really equivalent.
What has this got to do with anything.
Before they used to develop Xbox games as exclusives. Now they have decided to not have exclusives so Pc gamers don’t need to buy a console for that one game
Only at the surface.
Do you have any examples? Cause it seems to be more pro consumer policies than apple poses right now?
 
Ok. In other words no.
At least they have shifted side, just took shareholder’s demanding it. Apple has been vocal against it. so we all welcome it if they come out on top
Sure. But good luck to Microsoft implementing it.
iMac, Mac mini, Mac Pro? The Xbox went from terrible to great, but the stationary options went from great to terrible for no concrete benefits. (Except the backtracking on the Mac Pro thank god)
You carry around a mac pro?
Installing custom games and programs such as emulators if you activate developer mode.
Oh, activate developer mode. Got it.
Well they are selling them for free. So yes.
Cool so Epic is giving away their vbucks? Very magnamimous move by a scum-bag company.
Perhaps, but if everyone uses the windows store it will improve the security without removing consumer choice. And developers are incentivized to exist in the windows store as well
Well there is competition for a devs end-products. Here I though a dev only had one or two places to go.
Yes they offer the same services almost 1 to 1. Perhaps some differences such as no windows phone for obvious reasons.
Ah, I didn't realize that Microsoft has been offering the same type of ecosystem for the last 10 years.
Is this apple small businesses program? Considering apple takes 15% below 1 million on all programs, but microsofts takes 5% on every program irrespective of revenue. And games have 12% irrespective of revenue. And IAP 3d party solutions have 0% commission So perhaps not really equivalent.
Perfect. So let the devs develop for windows. Vote with your feet. Seems like Microsoft has it sown up and should make the DOJ happy.
Before they used to develop Xbox games as exclusives. Now they have decided to not have exclusives so Pc gamers don’t need to buy a console for that one game
Well I personally would not buy a console, but that's me.
Do you have any examples? Cause it seems to be more pro consumer policies than apple poses right now?
Microsoft has to tread very, very carefully with a 90%+ share of desktop operating systems. Many of the things you mentioned are just red-herring. Right to repair...is it there yet? xbox developer mode...eh what? Seems like rooting android. Microsoft fees? How much does the Microsoft store make vs the ios store? Seems like most devs are happy to give up some fees in return for a no-hassle platform. But the expression you can't please 100% of the people 100% of time applies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reggaenald
Ok. In other words no.
Ifixit have objective measurements for repairability
Sure. But good luck to Microsoft implementing it.
Shame apple didn’t do it first.
You carry around a mac pro?
No but everyone hated the Mac Pro trash can for its inability to be upgraded or expanded. Except for a small minority untill the 2019 redesign with universal praise.
Cool so Epic is giving away their vbucks? Very magnamimous move by a scum-bag company.
Well they aren’t giving away them. They sell them and keeps 100% in the windows store. And they allow other to sell their things inside their games and keep 100%
Well there is competition for a devs end-products. Here I though a dev only had one or two places to go.
They do. Office on iOS is one product, on android it’s another , on Mac is another and windows is also another product. That’s 4 different products. With only one available on each. Soon the android product can be used on windows so that will expand it to two.
Ah, I didn't realize that Microsoft has been offering the same type of ecosystem for the last 10 years.
They launched in 2012 but have been kind of as terrible as the Mac AppStore. Until recently
Perfect. So let the devs develop for windows. Vote with your feet. Seems like Microsoft has it sown up and should make the DOJ happy.
Yep, so they will escape the DOJ
Well I personally would not buy a console, but that's me.
Well many do as it’s cheaper than a computer to play games
Microsoft has to tread very, very carefully with a 90%+ share of desktop operating systems. Many of the things you mentioned are just red-herring. Right to repair...is it there yet? xbox developer mode...eh what? Seems like rooting android. Microsoft fees? How much does the Microsoft store make vs the ios store? Seems like most devs are happy to give up some fees in return for a no-hassle platform. But the expression you can't please 100% of the people 100% of time applies.
Indeed as long as they don’t enact anti competitive practices they would be fine. I suspect they find enjoyment for looking at google and apple being slapped with anti competitive fines.

And it’s not rooting, you just download an Microsoft app and pay a one time fee of 40$ I think.

And it’s completely fine that developers want to pay a fee for some things. And it’s also okey for them to have the option to do their own thing. So you satisfy 100% of People with choices instead of forcing everyone to use one solution
 
Ifixit have objective measurements for repairability
There is still no formal program in place.
Shame apple didn’t do it first.
Apple never does anything first, but when they do something it's a game changer.
No but everyone hated the Mac Pro trash can for its inability to be upgraded or expanded. Except for a small minority untill the 2019 redesign with universal praise.
Everyone? Proof of this?
Well they aren’t giving away them. They sell them and keeps 100% in the windows store. And they allow other to sell their things inside their games and keep 100%
Great...let them do that on windows.
They do. Office on iOS is one product, on android it’s another , on Mac is another and windows is also another product. That’s 4 different products. With only one available on each. Soon the android product can be used on windows so that will expand it to two.
This is why ultimately in the US it will be hard to change the way apple operates, even people who believe Apple should be regulated to death agrees there is competition.
They launched in 2012 but have been kind of as terrible as the Mac AppStore. Until recently
So not really.
Yep, so they will escape the DOJ
They didn't in the past, though.
Well many do as it’s cheaper than a computer to play games
Okay, but you are limited to titles.
Indeed as long as they don’t enact anti competitive practices they would be fine. I suspect they find enjoyment for looking at google and apple being slapped with anti competitive fines.
Yeah, thinking we've had enough of the DOJ with that IE thing.
And it’s not rooting, you just download an Microsoft app and pay a one time fee of 40$ I think.
Great, so play games on windows. If Apple loses enough gamers to windows, they'll change their policies. It's capitalism at work.
And it’s completely fine that developers want to pay a fee for some things. And it’s also okey for them to have the option to do their own thing. So you satisfy 100% of People with choices instead of forcing everyone to use one solution
So you agree no company is forcing anybody as long as there is competition capitalism will prevail. We've taken some huge strides here today.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Reggaenald
It pains me to see all the discussions over the legal developments over apple's anticompetitive behavior. Investing heavily in services and plastering adds all over the store, and being extremely greedy to maximize profits.
or their obsession to introduce the CSAM that nobody asked for and totally trashed their reputation for privacy and then apparently backtrack

and the whole thing of even denying they commit tax avoidance, that later was revealed to be completely intentional. paying less than 1% in corporate tax on international sales.
and their continues anti consumer practices when it comes to the ability to replace parts of their computer or phones.
the practical abandonment of the mac over the years, perhaps part Intel's fault, but still taking years between updates such as the Mac mini, MAc pro, Imac

Steve was happy to extort $2900 for an entry level Mac SE. He's no angel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_SE

He never listened to anyone, nor cared about anyone's opinions. Not the investors, not the Apple employees, and certainly he wouldn't have listened to someone complaining like you.

He's dead Jim. Move on.
 
I'd like to think so but he was involved in hiring Tim Cook, and even worse, Fast Eddie Cue.
PLEASE. I don't think Steve Jobs would be unhappy about his decision to hire Tim Cook, who has taken Apple to being the most successful company on Planet Earth. I think he chose the CEO that would ensure Apple's continued success for decades after his death. He chose well.
 
There is still no formal program in place.
Why would you need a formal program? We manage just fine without one
Everyone? Proof of this?
Well it went from 2013 to 2019 without any updates and they returned to the original functional design admitting it was a mistake.

And people was complaining so much apple even gave had a press meeting to reassure customers and apologize.
Great...let them do that on windows.
Well I can try and make apple change.
This is why ultimately in the US it will be hard to change the way apple operates, even people who believe Apple should be regulated to death agrees there is competition.
Well us is special. So EU will change them unless they leave. And that’s okay
So not really.
Who knows. Windows release just as much information as apple about their stores profits and revenue.
They didn't in the past, though.
Have they done anything now?
Okay, but you are limited to titles.
Better than no games at all
Great, so play games on windows. If Apple loses enough gamers to windows, they'll change their policies. It's capitalism at work.
Well I am forced to, apple already lost close to all game publishers. And every gamer.
Only 2~% of steam users use a Mac. So we will se when apple releases any relevant hardware you can play games on. I had to abandon the Mac for lack of releases and no stationary Mac was sold you actually could play anything on without melting the hardware or the wallet
So you agree no company is forcing anybody as long as there is competition capitalism will prevail. We've taken some huge strides here today.
Competition exist?Anti competitive? and anti consumer action? Yes absolutely to all of them
 
Steve was happy to extort $2900 for an entry level Mac SE. He's no angel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_SE

He never listened to anyone, nor cared about anyone's opinions. Not the investors, not the Apple employees, and certainly he wouldn't have listened to someone complaining like you.

He's dead Jim. Move on.
Well he was a dick. And he cared for his perfect product he envisioned. That’s also good. But he also cared about market share and starting a thermonuclear war with Samsung for copying apple that’s great as well.

Tim Cook is just a money person. Not a visionary. And they will die culturally and be the richest company in the graveyard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imanidiot
Steve was happy to extort $2900 for an entry level Mac SE. He's no angel.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_SE

Computers were more expensive in general back then but you can't directly compare retail pricing (MSRP) of Apple computers in the 1980s to how they are priced and sold today. The Macintosh SE you posted may have launched with an MSRP of around $2,900 but within a very short period of time, Apple dealers were selling them for at least 15% to 20% off and discounts increased from there. Additionally, there were even greater discounts available for the education market. You don't see nearly the same kind of Apple discounting or price reductions today on either the consumer of education side.
 
Steve Jobs would probably have a way to convince everyone that the 30% cut was not only justified, but an absolute bargain for developers. That’s really the only thing missing from Apple these days. His eloquence.
He could sell me a bucket of dookie with an Apple logo on it and I’d have no buyer’s remorse. He had a way of making average things sound magical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solomani
Strangely, Steve was all about the digital personal assistant and eliminating the personal computer over time, so I don't know that he'd be all that aggravated with anybody at Apple today.

I do know that he would have likely created a separate voice command operator like Siri but seperate from Siri development just to participate in the open source AI/Voice development industry that's hurling Alexa forward, way past Siri in the intelligent assistant arena.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sydde
My issue is I see it as apple essentially heading on a head on collisions to implode unless they change course early before it becomes way too late.
History is full of Apple like companies, doing the same thing as they grow bloated and implode to the next apple.
BLockbuster
Polaroid
IBM
NOKIA

Toys R Us
Compaq
General Motors
Kodak

etc etc
88% of the Fortune 500 firms that existed in 1955 are gone. These companies have either gone bankrupt, merged, or still exist but have fallen from the top Fortune 500 companies. Most of the companies on the list in 1955 are unrecognizable, forgotten companies today
So what? There are better products to buy than the ones currently offered by most of those. If some company comes along that offers superior product to Apple's offerings I'll switch without shedding a tear. It's a company not a religion and since I'm not a stock holder I really couldn't care less what happens to it, just that it, or any company makes stuff I want. And by the way, I never got a full refund of the $200 bucks overcharge for the iphone1. And they pulled the same stunt with the original Apple TV. Steve is DEAD. Putting your opinions in his mouth is, in my opinion, frankly disgusting. A cheap way to try to add weight to what YOU want. You haven't got a clue what he would think or do if he came back to impart his wisdom to his followers. None of us do.
 
macOS wouldn't have been in such a sad state UX-wise
Here I can agree with you partially. Steve Jobs was anti-jerking customers and developers around with the UX regardless of the age of your hardware and they've abandoned that hardcore. On the other hand Steve Jobs did also spearhead the no cost OS upgrades with he idea of accelerating the OS in a particualr direction, which we don't know, and that could be more or less what we have today.
 
If only that worked. Now apple have regulators so far up it’s backend it’s extremely likely the Rott will hit the fan by the governments blunt sledgehammer.

Steve wasn’t perfect, likely one of the biggest *******s. But he did put product before profits as the natural outcome would always end in riches.
Now it’s profit seeking and cost cutting and consumer traps intentionally making the consumer experience bad
The first thing Steve did when he returned to Apple was cost cut. Cut and killed products down to 4 main categories.
 
There's a difference between what one may wish a man dead 10 years might do, and what that resurrected man might/might not do.

If you're hoping that he would do the same thing he did when he returned to Apple when it was near collapse (slash product lines, realign staff, etc.)... The financial situation is unbelievably different.

Forget we're talking about Apple for a moment. Let's say Walt Disney returned from the dead to take over today's Walt Disney Company. Would he get rid of everything except traditional cel animation? Kill (highly profitable) Marvel Studios or ESPN? As much as some Disney fanboys may wish to a return to Walt's glory days, the Board of Directors would have Walt on his way out of town on a rail in 5 minutes if he proposed such things. And very likely, he would not, because today's Walt Disney Company is far larger and more complex than anything Walt ran. The Disney company when Walt died in 1967 was dependent on the success/failure of a handful of film releases each year, the performance of a single theme park, and a few TV series (not networks). It was a far more precarious situation than today's, when (COVID effects aside), a downturn in one or more sections of the company is offset by successes elsewhere.

It's common to wish for a Messiah to come from the heavens and change things you don't like, but it rarely happens. If it ever does you can bet that the change that comes will not be what you wished for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Analog Kid
There's a difference between what one may wish a man dead 10 years might do, and what that resurrected man might/might not do.

If you're hoping that he would do the same thing he did when he returned to Apple when it was near collapse (slash product lines, realign staff, etc.)... The financial situation is unbelievably different.

Forget we're talking about Apple for a moment. Let's say Walt Disney returned from the dead to take over today's Walt Disney Company. Would he get rid of everything except traditional cel animation? Kill (highly profitable) Marvel Studios or ESPN? As much as some Disney fanboys may wish to a return to Walt's glory days, the Board of Directors would have Walt on his way out of town on a rail in 5 minutes if he proposed such things. And very likely, he would not, because today's Walt Disney Company is far larger and more complex than anything Walt ran. The Disney company when Walt died in 1967 was dependent on the success/failure of a handful of film releases each year, the performance of a single theme park, and a few TV series (not networks). It was a far more precarious situation than today's, when (COVID effects aside), a downturn in one or more sections of the company is offset by successes elsewhere.

It's common to wish for a Messiah to come from the heavens and change things you don't like, but it rarely happens. If it ever does you can bet that the change that comes will not be what you wished for.

Folk do so love to also gloss over the failures of their chosen messiah.

Jobs was no angel - he had many failures under his watch - for example the development of Final Cut X that was panned horrendously upon release until Apple were forced to address the failings.

In addition it’s quite possible that Jobs wouldn’t have been able to continue pushing folk the way he did without them pushing back - you can only play that game for so long before cracks start to form.

And lets not forget his personal failures - not only did he have zero compulsion about driving his car without plates and parking illegally in disabled spots, he also failed to have his cancer treated by the correct medical specialists and instead opted for all manner of ‘holistic’ treatments - none of which helped and all of which made his cancer go from survivable to terminal.

He did some great things in his time - no two ways about it the man was a visionary. But no-man can continue that forever. Look at Zuckerberg for one - made Facebook the giant it was and is now in control of an out of control behemoth. Even Musk is showing that he’s slowly loosing control.

When your candle burns bright, it also burns quick. Anyone who claims that Jobs would have absolutely done things ‘better’ or that he’d ‘fire everyone’ is talking from desire to cling to times past.
 
What I like about threads like this, it really shows you the delusional logic and impracticality of various people who truly believe that they could’ve predicted what somebody (Jobs in this case) would’ve done if he were still in charge of a company today, ‘Steve never would’ve done that’, Cook needs to go’, ‘Cook doesn’t know what he’s doing’, etc.

Really though, it makes me appreciate and understand that some of the most radical people on the Internet of how they envision Apple should be, is a distorted, unsound broken reality.
 
But he did put product before profits as the natural outcome would always end in riches.
"He put products before profits because the natural outcome was huge profits"... *sigh*

These "Steve said", "Steve would", "Steve never" threads are so grotesquely cultish... The main reason I wish Steve was still around is so I could hear him eviscerate people in 10 words or less for claiming to know what he thinks.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.