You mean a pin sharp full touchscreen with better calibration then Apple and on the fly calibration switching and the dial which fully integrates with the screen and software plus high end PC components, actually that’s hypocrisy seeing as that’s what Apple use, they are all PC components, the GPUs are all based in gaming graphics cards!
No, the iMac Pro is not innovation, it is desperation to try and please and keep your customers who have left in droves, and they may well continue to, because I can’t see many professionals wanting to take their iMac Pro to an Apple store when it breaks and therefore losing them time and money, Dell or HP can provide onsite support, then again you can unscrew their computers as opposed to ungluing them...
I think you’ll find the real modular Mac Pro is the one people want, looking at the costs it won’t be much different to that of the iMac Pro either!
Talking innovation, the Surface Studio has it in droves, the iMac Pro not so much. They could and will update the Studio hardware, but it’s not built for gaming...
I don’t hate the iMac Pro, just see it as a bit pointless, the cost is incredibly high yet it’s still glued together and you can’t upgrade a thing in it? This is a machine built to earn money, so if it breaks as I said you’ll lose money? To me a machine at that price that’s upgradable and can be easily repaired makes more sense.
Not sure what you class as innovation as then? Nothing it would seem...