Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What do you think are the chances for a QoL upgrade to iMessage, so it looks even more attractive next to RCS (with UP 3.0)?

I‘m thinking stuff like:
- allow us to have different Caller IDs for different contact lists or individual contacts (e.g. more professional one for work contacts), which also ties into phone calls
- better search (WhatsApp and co. are far superior in that department) or at the very least search in individual conversations
- More granular auto-deletion values (e.g. half a year etc)
- integrate Hide my Mail into iMessage, to generate randomized one-off mails that you can use for chats you don‘t want to share your real info with. With potentially auto-expiry dates or easy revoking
- Increased group size limit from 32 to 100+ to match RCS groups
- Allowing us to leave groups with 3 or less participants (RCS allows that, as it stands iOS users are lost when Android folks dump a group)
- Deciding with which number / mail you want to start a conversation with (more granular than the existing default in settings)
- Allowing us to pin a conversation to an iMessage identifier (e.g. when my number deregisters accidentally, it doesn‘t fallback to a mail but instead fails sending the message and informs me about the issue so I can most of the time easily and quickly fix it)
- Displaying the current iMessage identifier for a contact more prominently (e.g. the recent tag in the contact sheet, so it‘s easier to spot whether I‘m using a contacts number or mail) and also allowing us to swap them out inline without going through new conversation panel
- Group typing and read indicators to match RCS on Android
- Group admin permissions to prevent others from adding unauthorized users
- Group invite links like other messengers have, with optional admin approval
- Per conversation auto-save media settings
- Allowing us to nuke SMS like you can nuke MMS (to prevent accidental SMS fallbacks for e.g. bad connection and RCS chats)
- iMessage / Apple Messages on the web (it‘s possible, anyone who claims otherwise doesn‘t live in the current decade where other messengers easily provide E2EE on the web)
- Allowing us to share individual focus mode name, icon and coloring (there is a difference between having fitness or sleep focus on, which should be communicated)
- Revamped inline replies UX, turning it into more of a threads system that‘s easier to navigate/ follow
- Smarter iCloud offloading: free up space more aggressively on device (maybe something similar to calendar sync cutoffs?), or pick to keep all messages
- Fix sync recovery for devices that aren‘t used frequently (every time my wife uses her Mac, it takes a decade to properly sync in messages since she last used her device)
- Integrate contact lists or have their own list / folder system to structure your inbox
- Better notification management for message types (e.g. block tapback notifications to reduce spam in groups)
- The opposite of focus mode deliver immediately: deliver quietly, for when you have a low priority message that shouldn’t ping your contacts device in case you don‘t want to disturb them

I feel like iMessage value proposal degrades year by year with other platforms adding great features and RCS slowly but surely closing in in terms of feature sets on iOS. I‘d love to get more contacts on iMessage, but the value proposal is really hard when iMessage has so many questionable design choices or lacks universally available functionality others have come to love on their messenger platform.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stiille
My guess for first beta is:
  • New look for Springboard/UI stuff
  • Option to change handoff AI from ChatGPT to Gemini and others
  • Visual Intelligence gets screen sharing support
  • Encrypted RCS
  • Maybe some more customization/themeing support. Icon picker? Vertical widgets? App Library category editing? Rename apps?
  • Wildcard wish: a real dock with more icons, magnification, and auto hide.
I am sure there is more, but this is just what I think will be in 26.0 beta.
Icon picker would be so nice + pressing power button turns on Gemini instead of Siri !
 
I’m really excited about the rumored Menu Bar on iPadOS! I’ve been thinking about ways Apple could implement a UI element like this on iPadOS for several years now, and it seems like Apple’s going to do it! And I don’t think it would necessarily require a connected keyboard, I’m guessing it will be able to be exposed by a swipe gesture or button when using the iPad without a keyboard and trackpad. But that is so exciting!

An app icon picker would be great, I could see them adding that with the new “Customize” menu introduced in iOS 18. 👍🏻
 
What do you think are the chances for a QoL upgrade to iMessage, so it looks even more attractive next to RCS (with UP 3.0)?

I‘m thinking stuff like:
- allow us to have different Caller IDs for different contact lists or individual contacts (e.g. more professional one for work contacts), which also ties into phone calls
- better search (WhatsApp and co. are far superior in that department) or at the very least search in individual conversations
- More granular auto-deletion values (e.g. half a year etc)
- integrate Hide my Mail into iMessage, to generate randomized one-off mails that you can use for chats you don‘t want to share your real info with. With potentially auto-expiry dates or easy revoking
- Increased group size limit from 32 to 100+ to match RCS groups
- Allowing us to leave groups with 3 or less participants (RCS allows that, as it stands iOS users are lost when Android folks dump a group)
- Deciding with which number / mail you want to start a conversation with (more granular than the existing default in settings)
- Allowing us to pin a conversation to an iMessage identifier (e.g. when my number deregisters accidentally, it doesn‘t fallback to a mail but instead fails sending the message and informs me about the issue so I can most of the time easily and quickly fix it)
- Displaying the current iMessage identifier for a contact more prominently (e.g. the recent tag in the contact sheet, so it‘s easier to spot whether I‘m using a contacts number or mail) and also allowing us to swap them out inline without going through new conversation panel
- Group typing and read indicators to match RCS on Android
- Group admin permissions to prevent others from adding unauthorized users
- Group invite links like other messengers have, with optional admin approval
- Per conversation auto-save media settings
- Allowing us to nuke SMS like you can nuke MMS (to prevent accidental SMS fallbacks for e.g. bad connection and RCS chats)
- iMessage / Apple Messages on the web (it‘s possible, anyone who claims otherwise doesn‘t live in the current decade where other messengers easily provide E2EE on the web)
- Allowing us to share individual focus mode name, icon and coloring (there is a difference between having fitness or sleep focus on, which should be communicated)
- Revamped inline replies UX, turning it into more of a threads system that‘s easier to navigate/ follow
- Smarter iCloud offloading: free up space more aggressively on device (maybe something similar to calendar sync cutoffs?), or pick to keep all messages
- Fix sync recovery for devices that aren‘t used frequently (every time my wife uses her Mac, it takes a decade to properly sync in messages since she last used her device)
- Integrate contact lists or have their own list / folder system to structure your inbox
- Better notification management for message types (e.g. block tapback notifications to reduce spam in groups)
- The opposite of focus mode deliver immediately: deliver quietly, for when you have a low priority message that shouldn’t ping your contacts device in case you don‘t want to disturb them

I feel like iMessage value proposal degrades year by year with other platforms adding great features and RCS slowly but surely closing in in terms of feature sets on iOS. I‘d love to get more contacts on iMessage, but the value proposal is really hard when iMessage has so many questionable design choices or lacks universally available functionality others have come to love on their messenger platform.
Apple may not want to make iMessage too much better because that gets them in trouble with regulators. If I recall correctly they were already practically threatened with having to allow cross compatibility with other messaging apps.

One week to go. Hopefully some good changes coming.
 
Are we thinking iOS 26 will just be a redesign with no new features? Or do we think a redesign and new features? I’m thinking the main update is just a ui change will be nice, i do hope some new features as well like split screen multitasking on the iPhones
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Are we thinking iOS 26 will just be a redesign with no new features? Or do we think a redesign and new features? I’m thinking the main update is just a ui change will be nice, i do hope some new features as well like split screen multitasking on the iPhones
I definitely think there will be new features as well. My guess is that Apple’s been working on the new design for several years already, and probably using macOS as kind of a testbed for some of the UI elements (frosted glass UI elements, 3-dimensional app icons and UI elements, etc.) to kind of gauge user experience and feedback. I think it will probably for sure look different from current macOS, but I think we have probably been seeing some hints at the new design language the past few years with macOS.

I think we’ll probably see more unified features within system apps across the platforms as well as a more unified design. My guess is that with the redesign, all or most system apps will fully lean into Swift Code, so would share the same base-code across the platforms, and hence probably the same features (unless in the case of hardware specific features that only make sense on a smartphone like cellular-related stuff and such). We’ve already seen Apple moving in this direction the past few years with greater unification of system apps across the platforms, and switching them over to a shared Swift Code base, so I think it makes sense that if Apple unifies the designs, they’ll just do it once with one base-code of the app in Swift, rather than trying to copy the design with different code on the Mac. I could be wrong, but that makes the most sense to me, and I think it aligns with the rumors and reports that the redesign is focused on unifying the platforms and making it more consistent “going beyond mere cosmetic changes”. Obviously iOS and iPadOS apps will probably have some different UI affordances from macOS versions, just as Swift already automatically can modify the app UI depending on what platform it’s running on.

Also, it sounds like iOS will be gaining a simpler version of Stage Manager, which would be interesting to see, though I don’t know that I would ever use it. But maybe that will be accompanied by an on-screen Split View capability.

To summarize, I think it’s nearly certain there will be new features in addition to UI changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kylo83 and TgeekB
Are we thinking iOS 26 will just be a redesign with no new features?
I think 26.0db1 will lead with new design and little else. We will probably get a full bento box on the slide, but I don’t think we will get most of it until 26.2 or later. I hope RCS improvements and AI stuff comes sooner, but it would be a happy surprise to be in 26.0.
 
Are we thinking iOS 26 will just be a redesign with no new features? Or do we think a redesign and new features? I’m thinking the main update is just a ui change will be nice, i do hope some new features as well like split screen multitasking on the iPhones
The rumors indicated that there would be a reimagining of how you interact with the OS. So I expect it to look a bit different but also to actually function differently as well, (think iOS 18 Photos app redesign) which will likely come with some new functionality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda

The Apple Developer website was updated with a new header graphic that includes the tagline, “Sleek peek,” which appears to be a direct reference to the design update. So, just in case you weren’t convinced before, you should get ready for iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and everything else to get a new look, which has been rumored to take design cues from visionOS. Apple may be putting a heavy emphasis on the new look during the keynote, since it’s reportedly going to downplay–maybe even not say anything at all–about the AI and AI-related features that have been a challenge, according to reports.

That’s not to say Apple will have nothing else to talk about. There will be new OS features to introduce, including, rumors say, a new Calendar app, a new gaming app, developer access to Apple’s AI models, and more. The WWDC25 keynote is on June 9 at 10 a.m. Pacific, and can be watched on Apple.com and the Apple YouTube channel. Be sure to check out Macworld.com for complete WWDC25 coverage.
 
One of the rumors, regarding iPadOS 26, is that the iPad UI will get closer to the macOS one.

Do you think the “desktop” or home screen of the new iPad UI will get rid of the app icon grid? They could do the same as on the Mac: leave all the apps on a “launchpad”, or just leave the App Library for that, leaving the home screen free for the wallpaper, widgets, and windows of the apps.

Do you think iPadOS 26 will resemble macOS 26 in this way? Or do you think it is more likely that we end up seeing the classic “app grid” of the iOS and iPadOS Home Screen moving into macOS 26? That would be horrid, in my opinion… I think the first option is much sleeker…
 
One of the rumors, regarding iPadOS 26, is that the iPad UI will get closer to the macOS one.

Do you think the “desktop” or home screen of the new iPad UI will get rid of the app icon grid? They could do the same as on the Mac: leave all the apps on a “launchpad”, or just leave the App Library for that, leaving the home screen free for the wallpaper, widgets, and windows of the apps.

Do you think iPadOS 26 will resemble macOS 26 in this way? Or do you think it is more likely that we end up seeing the classic “app grid” of the iOS and iPadOS Home Screen moving into macOS 26? That would be horrid, in my opinion… I think the first option is much sleeker…
I think Stage Manger was an example of what could have always been except for Apple insisted on copying the fixed grid from iOS. But now with rumors of a new look similar to VisionOS, what are they going to do with iOS when larger folding screens show up?
 
Last edited:
One of the rumors, regarding iPadOS 26, is that the iPad UI will get closer to the macOS one.

Do you think the “desktop” or home screen of the new iPad UI will get rid of the app icon grid? They could do the same as on the Mac: leave all the apps on a “launchpad”, or just leave the App Library for that, leaving the home screen free for the wallpaper, widgets, and windows of the apps.

Do you think iPadOS 26 will resemble macOS 26 in this way? Or do you think it is more likely that we end up seeing the classic “app grid” of the iOS and iPadOS Home Screen moving into macOS 26? That would be horrid, in my opinion… I think the first option is much sleeker…
I think it will be optional, as it already is now, to either put apps on the Home Screen, or hide them from the Home Screen and use the Home Screen just for the other things you mentioned and the App Library for accessing apps. That’s what I did on my iPad, it is a simple setting that hides all apps from the Home Screen. I don’t see Apple changing this, as it could be very confusing for average users of the iPad who are used to accessing apps from the Home Screen, and those who want to can already choose to hide apps from the Home Screen and use it that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ludatyk
Also, hear me out on this guys, I know all the reports are saying it will be called iOS 26, etc., but what if it’s actually 25? I thought if something interesting the other day. In prior years, the font and styling of the year number for the WWDC graphics was the same as the WWDC part. This year, the 25 has a different glassy effect, and so stands out and is somewhat emphasized. I know this is a hint at the glassy design elements of the new OS versions, but could it also be a subtle hint at the new version number? If they just wanted to hint at the glassy effect, why not just use the ring around the logo to do that, or the whole title of “WWDC25”? I don’t know that the new OS versions will be called 25, and like I said, most reports seem to indicate it would be 26, but I find that to be an interesting possible point of evidence towards the version number being 25. Regardless, we’ll see in a week! 👍🏻

Below, graphics from WWDC24 with a uniform design on all of the lettering, and then this year with a differently styled “25”:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5834.jpeg
    IMG_5834.jpeg
    142.2 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_5833.jpeg
    IMG_5833.jpeg
    176.3 KB · Views: 30
  • Like
Reactions: CooCool
I think it will be optional, as it already is now, to either put apps on the Home Screen, or hide them from the Home Screen and use the Home Screen just for the other things you mentioned and the App Library for accessing apps. That’s what I did on my iPad, it is a simple setting that hides all apps from the Home Screen. I don’t see Apple changing this, as it could be very confusing for average users of the iPad who are used to accessing apps from the Home Screen, and those who want to can already choose to hide apps from the Home Screen and use it that way.
It could be done like the initial configuration for the zoom of the screen and those things: do you want the classic grid of apps view? Or do you want the modern desktop view with all the apps on the App Library? And let the user choose at the initial configuration, or changing it later in the settings.

Or tying that view to Stage Manager view.

Or activating that macOS-like desktop when you connect a keyboard + pointer device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Also, hear me out on this guys, I know all the reports are saying it will be called iOS 26, etc., but what if it’s actually 25? I thought if something interesting the other day. In prior years, the font and styling of the year number for the WWDC graphics was the same as the WWDC part. This year, the 25 has a different glassy effect, and so stands out and is somewhat emphasized. I know this is a hint at the glassy design elements of the new OS versions, but could it also be a subtle hint at the new version number? If they just wanted to hint at the glassy effect, why not just use the ring around the logo to do that, or the whole title of “WWDC25”? I don’t know that the new OS versions will be called 25, and like I said, most reports seem to indicate it would be 26, but I find that to be an interesting possible point of evidence towards the version number being 25. Regardless, we’ll see in a week! 👍🏻

Below, graphics from WWDC24 with a uniform design on all of the lettering, and then this year with a differently styled “25”:
Good catch, but I still think it will be 26. The version number now it’s a reference for the year, and honestly it doesn’t make sense to use 25 to an operating system that will be released (with plenty of bugs) in October 2025… that will likely become polished and stable on January 2026 with the 26.3 version.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
I’m wondering if Apple will modernize Finder with a new icon and name, similar to what they did for System Settings. I know the Finder smiley face is iconic to macOS, but it really doesn’t give those new to the system any clues about what the app does, and to make matters worse, nor does the name. So maybe they’ll merge Finder and the Files app, and maybe on macOS it will be called “Files Finder”? With a folder icon with a smiley face on it? Or maybe they’ll just go all the way and rebrand Finder with the Files name and icon. I know this is probably a somewhat controversial take, but I do think it would make the platforms much more consistent and intuitive if Apple did this and just changes Finder over to Files, or at least something that people who use Files on iPhone, iPad and Vision Pro can recognize more readily as the file manager app. 👍🏻🙂.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: rmadsen3
Good catch, but I still think it will be 26. The version number now it’s a reference for the year, and honestly it doesn’t make sense to use 25 to an operating system that will be released (with plenty of bugs) in October 2025… that will likely become polished and stable on January 2026 with the 26.3 version.

Why in October vs the usual September release?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Also, hear me out on this guys, I know all the reports are saying it will be called iOS 26, etc., but what if it’s actually 25? I thought if something interesting the other day. In prior years, the font and styling of the year number for the WWDC graphics was the same as the WWDC part. This year, the 25 has a different glassy effect, and so stands out and is somewhat emphasized. I know this is a hint at the glassy design elements of the new OS versions, but could it also be a subtle hint at the new version number? If they just wanted to hint at the glassy effect, why not just use the ring around the logo to do that, or the whole title of “WWDC25”? I don’t know that the new OS versions will be called 25, and like I said, most reports seem to indicate it would be 26, but I find that to be an interesting possible point of evidence towards the version number being 25. Regardless, we’ll see in a week! 👍🏻

Below, graphics from WWDC24 with a uniform design on all of the lettering, and then this year with a differently styled “25”:

I hope you are right and it would make total sense, also being less confusing. For people using car manufacturer’s analogy (naming their car releases by the following year), let’s not forget that cars do not get upgraded every single year, so it allows them to keep the “novelty” factor for longer. Gadgets, on the contrary… So I hope that this year we will be getting OSs “25”, rather than “26”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Why in October vs the usual September release?
Because it’s not even the whole month. It usually launches towards the middle of the month, sometimes it’s rather late September like it was with iOS 17, which launched on September 18th, or iOS 13 which launched on September 19th and we had to wait for iPadOS 13 to be released in October that year.

So, honestly, for one week or 10 days, I think the sensible thing is to just consider October. With macOS it is even more pronounced, many years we’ve had to wait until October for it to launch.

Also, installing a x.0.0 version is never advisable. At the very minimum people should wait until the x.0.1 for the first bug fix update and if you ask me, nobody should upgrade until at least the x.1 version.

Maybe they will change the beta-release cycle and the beta period is extended way into October, where the final launch will happen along with the new devices. Or almost in November. Who knows…

Installing iOS ‘25 in January 2026 and updating it across all 2026 would make it feel outdated, frankly.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.