Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So an app that passed all of the reviews up front that didn’t contain any malware could inject malware after it was installed, and without any safeguards to prevent it. So JIT is a very big security risk, even though it can be useful.

I'm not knowledgeable on this type of stuff, would there be a way for them to allow it (based on approval) in a sort of sandbox or "walled garden" for lack of better term? Or would that basically defeat the purpose of JIT and that's how it operates now?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
I'm not knowledgeable on this type of stuff, would there be a way for them to allow it (based on approval) in a sort of sandbox or "walled garden" for lack of better term? Or would that basically defeat the purpose of JIT and that's how it operates now?
It’s possible there could be some secure way to allow it in a restricted way, but what I’m saying is that it would require lots of work and need to be well-thought out to make sure it wouldn’t pose a significant threat to security. Sandboxing can certainly help, and apps in iOS are already sandboxed to an extent. But sandboxing isn’t a completely foolproof way of preventing it from doing harm as I’m aware. It could still pose some threats even with sandboxing from what I can tell.

I don’t think it’s something that would necessarily be completely impossible to implement safely, I think it’s just going to be a difficult process and would require limits in order to decrease the risks. Web browser apps can already access a form of JIT entitlement as I understand it, but it is very heavily restricted in what it can do. The kind of JIT emulators would need would have to be managed differently than the JIT available for browsers. And I think that could be possible, I just think it’s more complex and difficult than some people give it credit for. Some people just argue that you should slap it on there unrestricted and sandboxing would fix everything, but that doesn’t seem to be the case. You really can’t completely sandbox an app from every other part of the system.

As I said before, I think it’s likely possible to implement in a more secure way, I just think it will take a lot of consideration and effort on Apple’s part to ensure it maintains their high security standards. 👍🏻
 
  • Love
Reactions: rgeiger97
As I said before, I think it’s likely possible to implement in a more secure way, I just think it will take a lot of consideration and effort on Apple’s part to ensure it maintains their high security standards. 👍🏻

So it'll probably just stay on our wishlists for a while since there's no way Apple will do all that work to give us more freedom by their own will lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
I predict some of the AI features that were intended for iOS 18 will be pushed back to iOS 19. And hopefully they prioritize system optimizations and speed. It’s been a while since we’ve had an update like that. The keyboard lags every once in a while in Safari.
This aged like fine wine.
 
This aged like fine wine.
It didn’t. Nowhere in that quote did they say the features would be pushed back to iOS 19. They merely said they had been pushed back. We still have most of a year worth of iOS 18 updates, it would likely drop in a later iOS 18 update like 18.5, 18.6, 18.7, etc.
 
It didn’t. Nowhere in that quote did they say the features would be pushed back to iOS 19. They merely said they had been pushed back. We still have most of a year worth of iOS 18 updates, it would likely drop in a later iOS 18 update like 18.5, 18.6, 18.7, etc.
But if the features are delayed until 2026, wouldn’t most iPhone 16 owners already be updated to iOS 19 by that point?
 
But if the features are delayed until 2026, wouldn’t most iPhone 16 owners already be updated to iOS 19 by that point?
They said nothing about 2026. They said the features would be delayed to sometime later than expected this year (2025). That’s well within the iOS 18 update cycle…
 
Looking forward to seeing a commercial where Bella Ramsey uses her iPhone 18 to ask questions to Siri on iOS 20.

Wait, what do you mean they shot and aired those commercials last fall?

Bella-Ramsey-Apple-AI-UWP-CUS.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: UpsideDownEclair
No it doesn’t… It means within the next year starting today. The article you’re referencing doesn’t agree with your interpretation…
I do think it’s noteworthy that they switched their language from “the coming months” to “the coming year” though 🤷‍♂️
 
I do think it’s noteworthy that they switched their language from “the coming months” to “the coming year” though 🤷‍♂️
That’s fine, but nowhere did they say that the features are delayed back into 2026. They very well could come in 18.5, 18.6, 18.7, etc. 👍🏻

Also, it’s worth noting that the official page has not changed its wording to “the coming year”. The page stills says coming months. One Apple spokesperson said “coming year” in an interview that likely means “within this year” over “in 2026”. If Apple knew it would be delayed that long, I would guess they would make a more official statement that they would have to postpone these features into 2026.
 
Last edited:
That’s fine, but nowhere did they say that the features are delayed back into 2026. They very well could come in 18.5, 18.6, 18.7, etc. 👍🏻
I hope you’re right. But at the very least, this confirmed the reports that they ran into issues with engineering these features, so we can put that to bed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
I hope you’re right. But at the very least, this confirmed the reports that they ran into issues with engineering these features, so we can put that to bed.
I agreed that the features have likely been delayed. I just think there’s still more chance we’ll see these features rollout in 18.5, 18.6, 18.7, etc. than in 19. I could be wrong, but nothing in this statement from this Apple spokesperson leads me to believe that we are waiting until 2026. If they knew they were running into that big of a delay, I would think Apple would have made an official announcement and changed the wording on the official page so that it’s not still promising these features in “coming months”. Like I said, maybe I’m wrong, I just wouldn’t rush to panic and doomsday just yet. 😉👍🏻
 
Last edited:
I’m looking forward to this thread getting back to iOS 19 speculation instead of complaining about Apple Intelligence rollout…
One thing I hope is that the focus of iOS 19 ISN'T Apple Intelligence. There are so many more things they could be working on.

I want springboard/spotlight/app library to get a complete rework.
I still want to be able to move an icon anywhere without my whole homescreen moving around.
I want an actual icon picker instead of this tinting stuff or using shortcuts as a workaround.
I want to be able to rename apps.
I want splitscreen on phones.
I want an RSS app.
I want a more professional and consistent look to the whole OS rather than this Windows XP blue/green stuff everywhere that looks both childish and old.
And RCS that is encrypted and just works.
 
Last edited:
One thing I hope is that the focus of iOS 19 ISN'T Apple Intelligence. There are so many more things they could be working on.

I want springboard/spotlight/app library to get a complete rework.
I still want to be able to move an icon anywhere without my whole homescreen moving around.
I want an actual icon picker instead of this tinting stuff or using shortcuts as a workaround.
I want to be able to rename apps.
I want splitscreen on phones.
I want an RSS app.
I want a more professional and consistent look to the whole OS rather than this Windows XP blue/green stuff everywhere that looks both childish and old.
And RCS that is encrypted and just works.
Yeah, totally agree about improvements to springboard, spotlight, and the App Library. And an icon picker could be nice. I don’t understand that last part though, iOS looks nothing like Windows XP. And I think iOS does look professional and consistent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TgeekB
People are so fixated on AI. It’s only one part of future updates. Developing the OS includes AI amongst other things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
iOS looks nothing like Windows XP. And I think iOS does look professional and consistent.

Depends on your definition of professional.

The icons in iOS are too big and too bright (lots of blues and greens, as I said). It reminds me a lot of the Windows XP Start button and default theme. I want something more like watchOS or visionOS. Something minimal and clean.

I have pointed out a few times my love for the Android launcher Niagra. It's very minimal, but still has some very information-dense widgets, great lock screen notifications, and a lot of customization options.

Screenshot 2025-03-07 151334.png


When scrolling, the letters flow. Reminds me of watchOS list view.

Screenshot 2025-03-07 151145.png


It doesn't bombard you with a lot of colors. In fact, you can just replace all icons with simple dots.

Screenshot 2025-03-07 151545.png


I'm not saying this is the best path for Apple to take with a redesign, but it fits my aesthetic nicely.

45414966-d4f7a700-b67c-11e8-9ef2-88509ad970ab.png
 
Last edited:
Depends on your definition of professional.

The icons in iOS are too big and too bright (lots of blues and greens, as I said). It reminds me a lot of the Windows XP Start button and default theme. I want something more like watchOS or visionOS. Something minimal and clean.

I have pointed out a few times my love for the Android launcher Niagra. It's very minimal, but still has some very information-dense widgets, lock screen notifications, and a lot of customization options.

View attachment 2489565

When scrolling, the letters flow like in watchOS list view.

View attachment 2489563

It doesn't bombard you with a lot of colors. In fact, you can just replace all icons with simple dots.

View attachment 2489566

I'm not saying this is the best path for Apple to take with a redesign, but it fits my aesthetic nicely.

View attachment 2489568
Meanwhile I don't even like using the dark icons in iOS 18 because it turns a lot of icons into similar looking black squares that are harder to identify at a glance. That level of minimalism might not be for me. 😆

I can see why someone would like it though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Depends on your definition of professional.

The icons in iOS are too big and too bright (lots of blues and greens, as I said). It reminds me a lot of the Windows XP Start button and default theme. I want something more like watchOS or visionOS. Something minimal and clean.

I have pointed out a few times my love for the Android launcher Niagra. It's very minimal, but still has some very information-dense widgets, great lock screen notifications, and a lot of customization options.

View attachment 2489565

When scrolling, the letters flow. Reminds me of watchOS list view.

View attachment 2489563

It doesn't bombard you with a lot of colors. In fact, you can just replace all icons with simple dots.

View attachment 2489566

I'm not saying this is the best path for Apple to take with a redesign, but it fits my aesthetic nicely.

View attachment 2489568
Ok, but if you don’t like the colors of the icons, the icon tinting feature in iOS 18 fixes that. As to size, I think they’re the right size to be easily touchable. But maybe they could add more icon sizes. 👍🏻
 
Last edited:
Totally agree on icon picker option !
Would be so nice if we could get that sometime in the future.

So I don’t have to go over shortcuts and lose the possibility to use Haptic Touch features for each individual app.

I love my homescreen right now, but it’s a pain to change the icons:

IMG_1687.png
IMG_1688.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kal Madda
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.