Maps is much better that Google Maps App. Although the original Google Maps was better.
How is it much better? Is it more accurate? Is the UI while navigating better? Are the POIs more complete.
Maps is fine, honestly.
You think Google Maps was perfect the first two years?
I went to Tom Tom and made 2 corrections relating to the problems with my map and directions to my location. I received a notice that my correction was approved and will be in the next update. Does this mean my problems with Apple maps will be fixed? Does anyone have an idea when Apple will update its maps and how often they update?
I posted quite a while ago about how bad apple screwed me with apple maps. Well, 5 (I'm guessing) months later. Still same ****. Wrong map info, sent another 20 or so notices about the incorrect maps, had my map fixed on Tom Tom, still nothing. This company seems to only be interested in getting retail product out the door, managing to suppress any bad info and do nothing about REAL customer service.
No, but they had the good grace to call it Google Maps Beta... and they're doing the same with the overhauled version.
And they did not charge money for it. When you buy an iPhone with iOS7, part of what you're paying for is Apple Maps.
Google calls everything beta to excuse their shoddy piece of garbage experiments and crappy customer service when you try to complain.
But again, that's why it's called a beta. Whether or not you think or feel it's a final version or not, when you read the word beta attached to something, you have to acknowledge that it's in testing which is totally appropriate, not sure how you can deemed that a negative. You're really going to seriously complain about a beta product? "Hey Google, I know product X is in beta, but this **** is so buggy! Fix your beta!"
Had a weird experience with Apple Maps. Was downtown Toronto, and was heading the direction Maps told me to only to realize that I was going the opposite direction I was supposed to be going. It kept telling me to keep going and going only to find I was moving further away from my destination.![]()
Yeah because Google slapping a beta label on something, selling it to customers, and then saying "oh, sorry, we can't provide support; you're on your own" isn't too shady.
I'm willing to bet every tech blog would be all over Apple's case if they ever did anything like that yet, because it's "sainted" Google, it's a-okay.
You're kidding right? Why would anyone get angry if Apple decided to say Apple Maps Beta? At least consumers would know, ok, Apple Maps is totally messed up here but it's a beta. You're acting like beta is wrong or something totally inappropriate. The only reason why Apple doesn't do this beta thing because they have this image that they need/want to uphold because that's how they have been operating and for the most part, they successfully executed. But the execution of Apple Maps was a total screw up. I guarantee you, if Apple came out and said they were ditching Google Maps for their own mapping application but would be in beta, it wouldn't have received the criticism it has.
But yeah, let's slay Apple for putting out a beta. God forbid they go through the software development process!
It's all about execution and setting expectations. If anybody should know that, it's Apple.
Has Siri ever officially come out of the beta?![]()
And they did not charge money for it. When you buy an iPhone with iOS7, part of what you're paying for is Apple Maps.
No, I submitted a fix for my street name via TomTom's online map share website nearly 18 months ago, but it's still wrong in Apple Maps. So, this tells me Apple's street data is at least 18 months out of date.
Apple Maps is free you are no more paying for Apple Maps than you are paying for Google's Maps.
They are both subsidised either by advertising in Googles case or through sales of software and hardware by Apple.
That tells you your specific example has not been updated for 18 months, it doesn't mean all street data hasn't been updated for 18 months. Extrapolating that no fixes have been implemented based off one issue is not a safe logical conclusion.
Edwin
Is Apple maps free? I'm honestly asking. I know it's on my iPhone, iPad and Mac, so certainly not free there.
I guess some could argue the definition of free but I'm only talking actual cash.
Yep it's free, you can get it for free without paying for it. Saying it isn't free because I need Apple hardware is disingenuous. You can even upgrade older Apple hardware for free to new a newer OS (iOS and OSX) with Apple Maps for no cost. So yes that is free in my book.
No cash needs to cross hands for you to use Apple Maps for free on any Apple hardware. Claiming you have to own Apple hardware to use a free feature so that means I am paying for it is not really logical IMHO and is splitting hairs to help the "Google is free Apple you pay for" argument.
If Apple made you download the app instead of including it on the phone, would you still NOT consider it free?
Hmm? Not sure if this is directed toward me. But yes I would not consider Apple maps "free" under any circumstance.
At least not as long as the funding for Apple maps department comes from Apple sales, more specifically iOS device sales.
Where exactly do you guys think the money came from to fund Apples leap into navigation/maps came from? Anything other then the consumer of their products would be the wrong answer. Long before maps was even a thing consumers were paying for it.
That is just silly IMO. Apple products cost the same with or without apple maps.
By your logic, no app is free then b.c we are paying apple to have the "app store" app.