So is this thread a place for people to list changes they would like to see in iOS? Because I'm pretty sure there's a subforum with a well-read topic on that very subject. People are free to state their opinions there, go for it.
But read the thread title, "iOS 7 Changes Mostly Cosmetic - More opportunity for Android to get further ahead". And the OP's posts - it's not just a list of preferences, it's presenting preferences as though they were objective problems, shoring up the idea that iOS is deficient, or spreading the idea that iOS 7 will be deficient.
Many people have read the OP's posts in good faith and found them wanting, or contradictory, or misleading, and when they point this out, they are accused of strawmanning or missing the point or going off on a tangent. As a result, I don't know how else one could respond to the OP beyond saying "yes you are right and if there's a problem with your argument it's my fault for not inferring a more sympathetic interpretation".
EDIT: The 'of course I don't mean every person is duped by Apple's marketing, how could I know the mind of millions of people' would be more convincing if the OP ever extended the same observation to other manufacturers. One also wonders what the point of saying that in the first place was - it was pretty elaborate, too, veils over eyes and everything.
What it's doing is setting the stage for the iOS 7 release: if it bombs, well, there's proof that Apple screwed it up. If it's successful, well, there's the proof that marketing trumps 'doing what people really want'. The OP's frame throughout the thread isn't simply to state preferences for iOS 7, it's to frame Apple as objectively second-tier. Then, if people are perfectly happy with iOS 6, or 7, then can be painted as disingenuous when they don't rehearse criticisms constantly.