Apple never intended the iPad to be a MacBook replacement. They see it mainly as:As much as I would like to disagree with you, Sidecar and the new Universal Control features are primary reason that the iPad run in parallel roads.
I'm hoping that's the case.. similar to how iPad users received mouse support in a 13.x release.
And this is my gripe with Apple… the necessity of trying to get consumers to buy into having two devices. No shade to you, but this is exactly what Apple wants. Exactly what was shown in the demo (Universal Control)…. When I would rather have only an iPad, nope… Apple wants to provide ways to buy multiple devices (iMac, MacBook AND iPad).
1. An alternative computer that’s easier to use for consumers who don’t want the complexity of a full desktop/laptop system (and there are VASTLY more of them than there are ‘power users”.)
2. An adjunct computer for Mac owners who would also like to use a lightweight, yet powerful touchscreen and stylus device running iOS for creativity and/or consumption.
Note: both 1 and 2 include “Pro” users, meaning professionals in many in fields (medicine, law, art, photography, real estate, management, etc.), and not just “tech pros”.
I’m in category 2 because I enjoy using both macOS and iOS. So, I don’t mind having both devices.
And you don’t have to break the bank to do so. Apole sells lower-spec versions of iPads and MacBooks, and there usually great deals to be found on the Apple Certified Refurbished page.