From all these "IPP-as-a-laptop-replacement" threads I see one common thread:
Most, or even almost all, of the peeps from the "we-don't-need-IPP-as-laptop-replacement-to-happen" camp seem to believe that the word "replacement" necessarily means a 1 to 1 ratio, an Apples-to-Apples equivalency (pun intended). And nope, not all of us who want it to happen necessarily mean "replacement" in the true sense of the word. If you really read carefully the arguments of those in the "we-want-it-to-happen" camp, you will see that our cries have more to do with defining "replacement" as a "we just need it to be viable enough!" kind of thing... under the understanding that a laptop will ALWAYS do those things better than an IPP.
So, look, just to make it clear:
We don't need iPads to become another flavor of Macbooks. All we need is just some small improvements on its basic usability in common day-to-day tasks that you can do with any Laptop. That's it. Laptops can and will always do some things better, and that's perfectly fine.
But then some will say : But , but ... iPads can already do all the day-to-day tasks a laptop can!!!! So shut up and stop whining!!!!!
And the answer is simple.
Nope. Not quite .... yet.
Can you format an external HDD with an iPad? No
Do you have an option for safely ejecting an external HDD without risking corrupting its data? Nope, you have to physically unplug it and hope it won't corrupt the drive.
Is file management on iPad as easy and smooth as in a Laptop? No.
Is multitasking on iPad as easy and smooth as in a Laptop? Nope. Stage manager was a step in the right direction but it's still not there yet.
Is there a time machine-like option for iPads? One that can seamlessly keep backups in physical disks and not just in iCloud? Nope.
Etc (you can find many other iPad basic shortcomings in this thread)
Improving on these aspects will make iPads more VIABLE as laptop replacements, but will not necessarily turn them into true replacements because macOS versions of DaVinci Resolve, Logic, Adobe Creative Suite etc. will ALWAYS be more powerful than the iPad versions ... and that is OK!.
For those of you on the "we-don't-need-this-to-happen-camp":
Dudes, please chill. There is no problem with iPads running scaled-down versions of pro software. We don't need iPads just to be mini Macbooks...we don't mind them not being able to run the same exact software, really ... there is no problem with Macbook being better at certain things than an IPP either... the problem is that some of these things a MB can do better are just so darn basic that, to put it simply, it's jarring.
What sort of things are jarring? Well now we are at a point where you can run perfectly fine scaled-down versions of Da Vinci Resolve and Logic on an iPP.... but I still can't format a damn external drive to use them with. That is jarring. I don't mind that the macOS versions of these Apps are more powerful, with more features, and that they will allow me to do the same thing faster or with extra filters or plugins. That is fine because I don't necessarily need all that extra power and features. All I want is to be able to work with these on my train commute, because touch interface suits me better in my commute but alas ... I can't. Why I can't you say? Because my projects are on an external drive so I can't work with them without the risk of corrupting them when I physically unplug the drive. That is what's jarring. And the worst thing of it all is that this is all Apple's own doing ... they could easily improve on all these little things but they don't ...they rather purposely neuter the IPP to force you to have a MAC AND and iPad, instead of giving you the freedom to chose one or the other. That right there is the problem.
Just my 0.002.