for some reason no matter what I set up as settings in the on screen keyboard, it resorts to default for the external keyboard.
I type quite fast so it seems that the more I type, the more the iPad has issues in visualizing it on the screen.
That's probably because Apple added separate settings for external keyboards. They're in the same spot in Settings but only appear if the keyboard is connected to the iPad.
I type over 100 words/minute and have zero lag issues. Let's be honest: the data transfer rate for a Bluetooth keyboard vastly exceeds what a person can type. Perhaps there's RF interference issues or something else going on.
If you Or someone nearby using a 2.4GHz WiFi (or something else that uses a 2.4GHz wireless transmission) this can be a source of interference for Bluetooth because Bluetooth is also at 2.4GHz.
Too cumbersome. Trackpad is needed.
Hm there is nothing that could interfere. Well I have a phone which Bluetooth setting is always on, but that should not have impact on the keyboard.
If you need to use a trackpad to write or edit text, then you are already not writing or editing text efficiently: whether you’re being inefficient with a mouse, a trackpad or a finger is irrelevant. They all mean you’re taking your hands from the keyboard, and that’s not helpful. With a properly set up keyboard, the times you need to leave the keyboard should be reduced to the bare minimum.
The Apple Smart / Folio keyboard isn’t there yet: they don’t use some of MacOS’s built-in shortcuts such as cmd-d/n/p etc, and you can’t yet remap the caps lock and enter keys to control. That’s not great, but the keyboard still beats a mouse etc for text entry and editing for most purposes, particularly if you’re using a dedicated writing program such as Scrivener/Ulysses etc.
Of course we can dream and hope that one day they’ll implement vim text editing, but I’m not holding my breath for that one. ;-)
If you need to use a trackpad to write or edit text, then you are already not writing or editing text efficiently: whether you’re being inefficient with a mouse, a trackpad or a finger is irrelevant. They all mean you’re taking your hands from the keyboard, and that’s not helpful. With a properly set up keyboard, the times you need to leave the keyboard should be reduced to the bare minimum.
Using a mouse with the keyboard can be very useful. For example, quickly selecting blocks of text (especially multiple) or words/numbers that you want to replace.
It's also useful when you're writing something to be able to quickly control other applications where you might be manipulating data or referencing material.
Apple will never produce a device that will eliminate another device from Apple.
An iPad is not a MacBook and will never be. Some uses can be replaced (browsing, e-mail acces, social media...) but without external storage and without OSX, iPad will never replace a laptop in a full way.
as I hope the vim reference made clear
Apple will never produce a device that will eliminate another device from Apple.
Apple will never produce a device that will eliminate another device from Apple.
An iPad is not a MacBook and will never be. Some uses can be replaced (browsing, e-mail acces, social media...) but without external storage and without OSX, iPad will never replace a laptop in a full way.
If we do [fear cannibalisation], somebody else will just cannibalize it, and so we never fear it... We know that iPhone has cannibalized some iPod business. It doesn’t worry us, but it’s done that. We know that iPad will cannibalize some Macs. That doesn’t worry us.
The iPhone has to become so great that you don't know why you want an iPad... The iPad has to be so great that you don't know why you want a notebook. The notebook has to be so great that you don't know why you want a desktop. Each one's job is to compete with the other ones.
If you don't cannibalize yourself, someone else will.
Apple will never produce a device that will eliminate another device from Apple.
An iPad is not a MacBook and will never be. Some uses can be replaced (browsing, e-mail acces, social media...) but without external storage and without OSX, iPad will never replace a laptop in a full way.
We don’ t need OSX on an iPad, but we need an enhanced version of IOS, with a (better) filemanger, and limited trackpad support for text intensive apps. And we need apps like full photoshop (in the works), Xcode , Final Cut Pro.
When they are saying its a computer replacement, when they are boasting on stage as to how it outperforms 90% of notebooks sold with its sheer power, its not that they will never - it's just a time when it suits Tim Cook & co.
There does seem to be a groundswell of opinion with these iPad reviews, that iOS is the weak link again (as it was before iOS 11 appeared), so I wonder if they will sit up and listen as the current position doesn't make any sense if they want to sell more iPad Pros.
It does seem like Apple should be willing to move quicker and take more risks when it comes to releasing functionality for the iPad. So why aren't they? Is it priorities? A lack of resources?