they really don't look different at all, the decision to max/ultra or pro. I usually have the max but for the last few months have had a pro - so I feel i am very use to the Pro now lol.. never thought that would be possible!
Yes. 6/Plus was optical image stabilization. 6S/Plus was the same. 7/Plus was the second lens! (7 had one camera/lens, 7 Plus added the telephoto lens.) 12 Pro vs. Max was big - iPhone 12 Pro Max adds a 47% larger sensor and sensor-shift image stabilization to the main camera lens, and replaces the f/2.0 aperture 52 mm telephoto camera lens with a f/2.2 aperture 65 mm lens over the non-Max model.Isn't this more of an exception rather than the rule, when has it happened except than on the 6/6 Plus? Once or twice more, something like that? You can cry all you want and say that it should be a Pro thing and not a Max thing but you might want to consider that it's actually a physical space thing. Give them a year to shrink the new feature so it fits into the smaller phone.
Oh Screw you “_______” (BMW, Ford, Mercedes, Samsung, Tesla, Sony . . . ), for only putting best features on the higher priced premium model. this was my year to upgrade, but I really want the “_________” provided on the “________” model. Maybe next year it will trickle down . . .Oh, screw you, Apple. I am so tired of the best camera features only coming on the "larger than I want" version of the phone. Dating all the way back to the iPhone 6, where only the 6 Plus got image stabilization. Regularly, Apple has included photo features on only the Plus/Max size phone, not the regular. It should be a *PRO* thing, not a "Max" thing. This was my year to upgrade, but I really want the better zoom, so now I'll be waiting an extra year and hoping (like in past iterations) the better photo feature trickles down the following year.
No, I don’t think there’s much difference in plug-ability and long term reliability. Of course they could use really bad connectors, but that’s not a USB-C inherent problem. I used a Huawei P9 with USB-C for many years and it’s as solid as it was the first day.nobody got anything to say about this?
The ports getting loose might be bad luck or maybe a little “too much” connecting and disconnecting and maybe in not a “delicate” way.nobody got anything to say about this?
Why? They’ve been at 6GB of RAM for 3 years now. 8GB given the camera upgrades seems reasonable. I’m waffling on colors but most certainly ordering a 15 Pro Max/Ultra on launch day.I very much doubt we’ll see 8GB of RAM in an iPhone this year
They’ve gone back and forth. The 11 XS/11 Pro/13 Pro/14 Pro all had the same exact features across the board between the standard and Max variants.Oh, screw you, Apple. I am so tired of the best camera features only coming on the "larger than I want" version of the phone. Dating all the way back to the iPhone 6, where only the 6 Plus got image stabilization. Regularly, Apple has included photo features on only the Plus/Max size phone, not the regular. It should be a *PRO* thing, not a "Max" thing. This was my year to upgrade, but I really want the better zoom, so now I'll be waiting an extra year and hoping (like in past iterations) the better photo feature trickles down the following year.
Apple sells hundreds of millions of iPhones a year, so I think your assertion would be incorrect.[…]
We also have to keep in mind that outside of the Apple enthusiasts bubble, people don’t really care about the latest iPhone. […]
If the “lesser” brand is selling product at a price overlap (which is happening) then the premium brand needs to increase prices to hold on to the “premium” moniker. Otherwise, the lesser brand becomes The premium brand, if customers are willing to pay.This analogy makes no sense as neither example would require a price increase for the "premium" brand. I'll answer your question as to what would happen if Chevy and Bentley had a price overlap. Chevy would sell far fewer cars and Bentley would sell far more. If Bentley is doing their job then they already have the price set to maximize profits. Charging more than that ideal price point would hurt their profits regardless of what the competition is charging.
You are right, and it sold over a billion Lightning iPhones since the switch from the 30-pin connector, which is the point I'm making. Lightning is not going away anytime soon. But I agree my comment could create confusion, so I fixed it. Thanks!Apple sells hundreds of millions of iPhones a year, so I think your assertion would be incorrect.
Except they're the same model. One in theory is just a bigger screen. This isn't like comparing a BMW 5-series to a 7-series. It's like comparing the 7-series standard wheelbase to the 7-series long wheelbase, and finding out that only the long wheelbase has heated and ventilated seats. (Although in reality the 7-series is high enough end that of course those are standard.) Or the Ford F-250 short bed to the F-250 long bed. Ford doesn't offer the good infotainment system only on the long bed.Oh Screw you “_______” (BMW, Ford, Mercedes, Samsung, Tesla, Sony . . . ), for only putting best features on the higher priced premium model. this was my year to upgrade, but I really want the “_________” provided on the “________” model. Maybe next year it will trickle down . . .
No such expectation on my side, for sure. Right now Apple would offer me, ahem, CHF25 for my 11 Pro (fully functional, not cracked). This is basically nothing in Switzerland. Once they release the 15 range they will update the trade-in values downward, so I guess my 11 Pro will have a less-than-nothing trade-in value.Is it expected that iPhone 11 Pros will have trade in value?
Other vendors have squashed periscope cameras into tiny spaces.
USB-C and periscope now, 8GB and improved periscope later.Why? They’ve been at 6GB of RAM for 3 years now. 8GB given the camera upgrades seems reasonable. I’m waffling on colors but most certainly ordering a 15 Pro Max/Ultra on launch day.
a time machine would be niceI'm not sure what massive hardware upgrades you could expect here. The fastest mobile processor, 2-3 years ahead of anything else out there. Titanium, the strongest and lightest material you can expect in a phone. A periscope lens, not the first of its kind but that's about as good as you can get. USB type C to kill Lightning forever. Has there ever even been a year that iPhone had this big of a hardware leap? Or any phone for that matter?
One loses the ability to have two active eSIMs, and one loses the extra IP protection. Depending on where one purchases it, one may lose bands in use in one's home country.If one were to buy the phone in a foreign market to keep the SIM slot - excluding cost, what other negative attributes can one expect?
No.Will any other mainline feature be removed/disabled?
Having done that many times before I switched to two active eSIMs and two inactive ones that I enable occasionally, I am pretty confident that whatever failed with your SIM, was something that failed with your SIM, not (as you seem to be implying) some conspiracy of AT&T's. I have never had a SIM locked iPhone since my original iPhone (iPhone 3G was purchased unlocked in Australia, iPhone 3GS was purchased unlocked in the UK, iPhone 4 was purchased unlocked in Canada, etc.), and I was never forced to replace my in the way that you described.If I were to continue to use my AT&T SIM card in the new phone, will AT&T not register it on the network, as when I bought a new SIMless phone and transferred the SIM to the new phone, within a week my SIM got "disabled" and had to visit the local AT&T shop and the clerk replaced it with a new card for some lame reason.
You go into an AT&T store and ask for a SIM, they will give you a SIM. I have never seen any evidence that they care one way or another.Will I experience similar and this time will not get a new SIM and forced to use eSIM?
If you have two carrier accounts you can use two simultaneously. An iPhone 14 can have up to eight eSIMs stored and 2 active at the same time. If one has one physical SIM, I think the answer is still the same, but it means that one can only switch among the active eSIMs for that slot.Will I be able to use both eSIM and SIM simultaneously or at least can through the OS enable one over the other?
They are trying to remove it from every market. The best way to do that is to remove it from every iPhone sold in markets with mature eSIM support. This encourages those carriers that do not yet support eSIMs to do so, in order to support those iPhones sold with no SIM slot. The more iPhones sold without support for a physical the more pressure on carriers that want to be able to serve those customers to support eSIM.Because I do not see why they are removing it from certain markets if folks were to travel to other markets where eSIM isn't a thing it seems to be a dumb idea.
Like all of these decisions made by Apple, their goal is to push the market in a particular direction. When Apple dropped support for ADB in favor of USB, people said it was too early. Very little USB gear was available, and Windows support for it was totally broken (Bill Gates did a demo of it at CES that crashed on stage). Apple's actions pushed the market and helped establish USB.Apple is a global company, this isn't a "courageous" removal
And yet every major phone manufacturer followed Apple's lead and did the same thing despite having at least a year where they had them and Apple did not, creating a head to head test. (This was especially true in the Android world where not every manufacturer dropped the port at the same time.) The market spoke and most people disagree with you.--and honestly i dont think the removal of the 3.5 mm adaptor is still a good one.
Most of the third party DACs had a charging port, and people who really cared about audio quality, use/used an external DAC, rather than the mediocre one Apple shipped.I still much rather have a gold-plated copper wire transmitting audio than a wireless and laggy protocol. Especially when there is no first party Y-cable to charge and use the 3.5 to lightning adaptor that will forever sit in my junk drawer as I make way for the 3.5 to USB cable . . . .
Yes I am.You are not in the target demographic for the iPhone 15. As far as the price the people will vote with their dollars.
My experience as well.Imo lightning ports are more durable.
I agree.Imo, lightning ports are easier to insert by feel.
You have a point…USB-C and periscope now, 8GB and improved periscope later.
Sorry, not sure how this decision is "pro-environment". I expect at most one or two more generations with any cable port and that means that many people will have to throw out many perfectly good Lightning cables they already have, in order to buy a whole new set of new USB-C cables that are a compatibility nightmare.The environment is more critical than your Apple stock dividend. Sorry, not sorry.
Fortunately, no one is forcing you to buy one. You can save your money and wait for some future iPhone update that excites you, or even move to some other manufacturer's phone that you like better.What a boring update… again