I don't trust the rumors that we see a new periscope lens allready in 2026 iPhones. That would be totally untypical for Apple. Normaly, they introduce new sensors and than roll it to the lower models over 3-4 years time. Like e.g. iPhone 12 pro max main got iPhone 15 pro max ultrawide and so on. iPhone 16 pro will allready see a new main sensor and the rollout of the periscope to the normal pro. Don't expect it to include a new sensor a principal new arrangement- maybe an additional lens or image stabilisation but no general twist.I think 5-6x is what the 15 Pro Max will be getting. Next year’s 16 Pro Max is likely to have the periscope lens you want based on the rumors. As for the 8GB of ram, I would be surprised if Apple decided to stick with 6GB. Unless Apple decides to also keep that extra ram exclusive to the 15 Pro Max which would suck.
Innovation and the market gave us leaded gas, CFCs and asbestos.I couldn't disagree more. In fact I think the opposite - that governments basically almost never do the right thing, and if they do, they do it either in an unethical manner and almost always in an abusive and utterly wasteful way.
Expected to include EU's environmental disaster that is USB-C.
Isn't this more of an exception rather than the rule, when has it happened except than on the 6/6 Plus? Once or twice more, something like that? You can cry all you want and say that it should be a Pro thing and not a Max thing but you might want to consider that it's actually a physical space thing. Give them a year to shrink the new feature so it fits into the smaller phone.Oh, screw you, Apple. I am so tired of the best camera features only coming on the "larger than I want" version of the phone. Dating all the way back to the iPhone 6, where only the 6 Plus got image stabilization. Regularly, Apple has included photo features on only the Plus/Max size phone, not the regular. It should be a *PRO* thing, not a "Max" thing. This was my year to upgrade, but I really want the better zoom, so now I'll be waiting an extra year and hoping (like in past iterations) the better photo feature trickles down the following year.
However, the pricipal assumption we get the IMX903 is not correct. The main sensor will still be der (Sony) IMX803 with 1/1.28" - which is an really larger sensor allready and nearly as large as the 1/1.2" sensor of the legendary Nokia pur view 808.We hear this every year and then I can barely tell the difference from one year to the next. I am ready for a huge leap in camera technology, and I think Apple could still surprise us all as they do every year with something. Forget CMOS, I’d like to see Apple wedge a little and affordable SPAD sensor into the iPhone for truly incredible night photography. Maybe one day…
I am afraid this will be the case. It’s a pity apple is always bit slow on upgrading hardware. Currently 48 megapixel output raw is bit too compressed and slightly larger and modern sensor might give needed boost to image quality.However, the pricipal assumption we get the IMX903 is not correct. The main sensor will still be der (Sony) IMX803 with 1/1.28" - which is an really larger sensor allready and nearly as large as the 1/1.2" sensor of the legendary Nokia pur view 808.
And truth to be told. Only titanium frame is a “new feature”. Rest of these, even it we got more RAM are incremental updates which happen when we have advances in technology.> with these 12 new features
Not to mention Improved Pricing, that is, from Apple's point of view.
You cannot make a profit without benefitting humanity. Unless you persuade people to buy your product or service - and they just won't do it if it doesn't benefit them - you won't make a cent. Try it!Innovation and the market gave us leaded gas, CFCs and asbestos.
Guess who decided to protect us against those rather harmful things?
Also, nothing abusive or wasteful on banning harmful substances. The goal of “the market” is profit, not to benefit humanity.
Except it actually doesn’t because Apple didn’t engineer two different phones to take advantage of that space. The phones without a SIM card just have useless filler taking up the place where the SIM would go on the SIM-less versions.Do you want more battery? Because removing the SIM slot frees up considerable space inside the phone.
Surprisingly empty list. And they want to increase the price?I’m confused, I didn’t see the list of new features?
I totally agree with you. If I would want something bigger than the iPhone Pro model I could easily buy an "iPad mini."Oh, screw you, Apple. I am so tired of the best camera features only coming on the "larger than I want" version of the phone. Dating all the way back to the iPhone 6, where only the 6 Plus got image stabilization. Regularly, Apple has included photo features on only the Plus/Max size phone, not the regular. It should be a *PRO* thing, not a "Max" thing. This was my year to upgrade, but I really want the better zoom, so now I'll be waiting an extra year and hoping (like in past iterations) the better photo feature trickles down the following year.
If this "Up, up, up we go!" trend doesn't stop I will be forced to say goodbye to the iPhone Pro models.6.1" and 6.7" displays still for Pro + Pro Max this year. 6.3" + 6.9" rumored for next year. Up, up, up we go!
I agree. The zoom should be on both Pro’s, not just the larger Pro. Smaller Pro should have reduced price then if it is not really a full fledged Pro.Oh, screw you, Apple. I am so tired of the best camera features only coming on the "larger than I want" version of the phone. Dating all the way back to the iPhone 6, where only the 6 Plus got image stabilization. Regularly, Apple has included photo features on only the Plus/Max size phone, not the regular. It should be a *PRO* thing, not a "Max" thing. This was my year to upgrade, but I really want the better zoom, so now I'll be waiting an extra year and hoping (like in past iterations) the better photo feature trickles down the following year.
Er, they've been doing that for a very long time. That's why all the base voltage electrical outlets are the same in your country, and it's a good thing because you can plug anything you buy into them. It's called a standard and that is VERY consumer friendly. Heck the voltage being the same is another standard and a VERY good thing that it's regulated. Why shouldn't small electrical devices enjoy the same consumer friendly stance? In a very few years lightning will be gone and we wont miss it at all since whatever we buy will be covered by what we have.I am on your side regarding the decree - I don't even think a government or super-government body such as the EU should ever have the power to mandate a particular power connector to a private business.
6.1" and 6.7" displays still for Pro + Pro Max this year. 6.3" + 6.9" rumored for next year. Up, up, up we go!
I’m not saying that there will be no impact on the environment, just that it will not generate nearly as much more e-waste as OP pretends. I already own multiple USB-C cables, so I don’t need to buy more. Some will need to buy USB-C cables and chargers, but I’m sure that a decent proportion of the population already owns at least one.I'm in the EU and when I get my 15 pro max I'll have to replace all the lightning cables and chargers I've collected over the years and which serve me well. At home, at work, in the car and when travelling. Which would have served me well until Apple and the ecosystem get rid of wired connection altogether (which I only really need for wired carplay btw. no massive videos or anything). So from a personal perspective it's hardly a big win environmentally or financially speaking.
Then a back of an envelope calculation. My guess is that given Apple has a notoriously high customer satisfaction AND iPhone market share is not growing at a huge rate => the majority of people buying new iPhones will be existing Apple customers and NOT switchers. By the same token not a huge number of people are switching to Android.
QED the majority of purchasers will have an experience similar to mine and be having to replace perfectly good cables.
So yeah, I concur with the cynical tone.
(Fair disclosure I actually live in Brussels, have daily experience of the EU thing and observe time and time again how well-meaning bureaucrats tamper naively with complex systems to produce unintended results.)