$559 doesn't include R&D, development cost.Good thing Walmart doesn't make them or the retail price would be $559.98 They'd make it up on volume of course.
Just parts ?
$559 doesn't include R&D, development cost.Good thing Walmart doesn't make them or the retail price would be $559.98 They'd make it up on volume of course.
But Samsung is paying chip development cost to Qualcom (agree that Qualcomm is spreading development cost across customers), same story, Google is charging Samsung for using Android.The base model, S23 Ultra, costs over 1300€, without having the costs of developing the operating system, App Store or iCloud, maintenance of data centers, hardware is developed by Qualcomm (processor, sensors, modem), and I could continue, from lag to disastrous UI / UX.
I don’t understand why people forget that they are more expensive phones than the iPhone with no reason to be more expensive.
Most of the difference is from customs and taxes may be ?This article was written as if Apple sells the iPhone in USA MSRP, worldwide.
There are 1.3b active iPhone users worldwide vs 150m in the USA, so approximately only 10% of iPhone pros are sold at $999/$1199.
View attachment 2300072
We all turn a blind eye to the piles of electronic waste when we want something new and shiny. Good business plans can ignore that? Maybe time to re-evaluate what makes a good plan.That’s a great business plan, we’ll release something when we are ready. /s
I’m a firm believer in recycle and reuse as much as possible and large companies who produce consumer products should aid in this. But I have no remorse in turning in one product and buying another.We all turn a blind eye to the piles of electronic waste when we want something new and shiny. Good business plans can ignore that? Maybe time to re-evaluate what makes a good plan.
Or simply do not buy at all.Because (contrary to what those who come to Apple's defense say) there is a significant boutique factor to the iPhone. Note, I didn't say the iPhone is ONLY a boutique device, but that it is a significant factor. iPhones offer terrific functionality but functionality alone isn't what allows Apple to charge as much as they do.
So yes, Apple has to conjure up marketing points (like titanium) as a way to encourage people to upgrade before they NEED to, and to justify the increase in cost. Using titanium instead of aluminum certainly costs more to produce, but not as much as Apple charges for the increase.
Apple will keep doing this (and charging obscene (IMO) upcharges for larger storage options) until and unless customers stick to the base configurations in large enough numbers to affect their bottom line.
100% guarantee vision pro won’t be around for long. Car Play is software I’m talking burning cash on an actual car.That first one is just an absolute 🤡 take.
As for the second, not only do you have no idea… but are you really that clueless about the existence of Apple CarPlay?
It’s called taking your customer base for mugs strategy. Apple is no longer a customer focus first company.Like Mother Nature likes to say, trillions don't grow on trees. In a way, the Tim Cook era is the triumph of the "double the memory from tight to decent, quadruple the price" strategy.
You seem to think you know something.
I could also see the Vision Pro flop but pretending to know what will happen is annoying.
Don’t know what you’re looking at but the cost of my Pro Max has increased £150-£170 every year until this 15 Pro Max release.That's not true. There have actually been multiple years of price DECREASES in the UK. For example, the starting price with VAT of the Pro models went from £1,049 for 11 Pro to £999 for 12 Pro (decrease #1) to £949 for 13 Pro (decrease #2) to £1,099 for 14 Pro to £999 for 15 Pro (decrease #3).
Memory probably costs them $10 difference between 256-1TBOne of the cameras costs $30, read again.
Don’t know what you’re looking at but the cost of my Pro Max has increased £150-£170 every year until this 15 Pro Max release.
Hard to track down accurate pricing since most sites only list the base starting price. From the 12 Pro Max to 13 Pro Max 256GB I paid roughly £130 more. Then the 13 to 14 was around £170 price increase which I didn’t purchase because it was day light robbery. The 15 Pro Max may have dropped in price but it’s still heavily overpriced for what it is. It’s not really a price drop either because the prices have increased year on year. So they making it look like they’re giving you some value but it’s not.There are a variety of sources for previous iPhone UK pricing. Below is a link to one that goes up to iPhone 13.
It shows:
11 Pro started at £1,049 and Pro Max started at £1,149
12 Pro started at £999 and Pro Max started at £1,099 – a DROP in prices
13 Pro started at £949 and Pro Max started at £1,049 – another DROP in prices
![]()
The Changing Costs Of Apple iPhones Over The Years
We've collected data to illustrate how the affordability of an iPhone has wavered over time, comparing the sharp inflation of Apple’s smartphone prices to the much gentler increase in the cost of UK essentials, including rent, wages and pints.repairoutlet.co.uk
Hard to track down accurate pricing since most sites only list the base starting price. From the 12 Pro Max to 13 Pro Max 256GB I paid roughly £130 more. Then the 13 to 14 was around £170 price increase which I didn’t purchase because it was day light robbery. The 15 Pro Max may have dropped in price but it’s still heavily overpriced for what it is. It’s not really a price drop either because the prices have increased year on year. So they making it look like they’re giving you some value but it’s not.
Your figures don't match Apple pricing.
A 256GB 11 Pro Max was £1.299
A 256GB 12 Pro Max was £1,199 which was £100 lower
A 256GB 13 Pro Max was £1,149 which was £50 lower
A 256GB 14 Pro max was £1,309 which was £160 higher
A 256GB 15 Pro Max is £1,199 which is £110 lower
Those prices are off.
Hopefully the pro max stays the same as well .Hopefully, the pro model stays at $999 I assume that's where the sales are at. I don't think Apple will risk increasing it by $100 more since that could affect sales.