Yeah I’m not even sure if “lackluster” is the right word. It seems like a deliberately hobbled market segmentation device: less that the product ladder tempts you with, “well, if”m spending $x, then I might as well spend a bit more and get this even shinier thing…” than, “well, yes, this does indeed have 95% of what you want, and if you don’t care, you will be happy. But if you think you’re getting the 16 with less camera, er no, we saw you coming and have Intel Celleron’d it so you think again. Why? Because we can.” And, it seems different from previous SEs which were just recycled hardware: this case design has always had MagSafe, so it’s not like they didn’t squeeze it in, they took it out. And, they made a big deal about engineering the board, so again, no UWB seems like a choice, not just because the original version never had it either.I feel like you might be projecting - I don't really see anyone on this thread defending this lackluster release.
I have the 13 mini — love the format but clearly the war is lost, and battery isn’t great. I don’t need to replace and TBH would like to see the “17 Air” before up- or side-grading but I like the smallest possible phone and take pretty conventional photos, and even then tend to edit on my Mac. Blah blah but 16e was looking good, and I even get no mmWave with the C1, but MagSafe and UWB seem like deliberate gotchas so as not to cannibalize regular 16 sales. If something happens to my 13 mini the right answer is a refurb regular 16: so, rather than tempting me as the video certainly was, I am motivated to hold on and maybe get a battery swap done: this is not the droid I was looking for!
Last edited: