Now you are moving the target so to speak. This is about Apple and not Android. They are throttling the iPhone 7...it is only a year old.....
This quote sure seems like you are saying you trust what Apple is doing.
From the Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...eap-way-to-replace-it/?utm_term=.78efe205f7cc
I agree with this wholeheartedly.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/12/20/app...atteries-instead-of-slowing-down-iphones.html
If future IOS updates slow down phones because of aging batteries....why not let people opt out of the IOS updates?
Instead it is hard to dismiss the constant prompting to download and install the IOS update.
Why not inform them or give them options?
Here is a great article on BGR......
http://bgr.com/2017/12/21/iphone-battery-life-vs-slow-performance/
No, my comment was purely that Apple has *always* stated it knows best. That's what they've been routinely criticized for by many. Sometimes rightly so, other times Apple actually gets it right. That's not blind trust, that's stating a fact. I didn't suggest that they're right, wrong, or indifferent, just that this decision is in line with virtually every decision they make about their products: they know what's best, the consumer does not.
I've stated they handled it wrong and they should offer other options but again, it has nothing to do with planned obsolescence. Planned obsolescence would include letting the phones die on the vine. I brought up Android OEM's as a counter point because if the insistence is that proactively trying to lengthen the life of their phones "proves" Apple is trying to force an upgrade, what do we make of OEM's who don't bother doing anything at all?
And that's actually a pretty terrible editorial from BGR. The person who wrote it doesn't seem to understand anything about smartphones. But that's BGR these days.