To imply that his review was influenced by the fact that his child is called Max, and therefore he would criticise the iPhone as a result, is patently absurd.
I’m not sure what else needs to be said, your foolishness speaks for itself.
He implied it all by himself, by saying it during the review, why is that difficult for some posters to grasp.
Nothing else can be said because your looking foolish by discounting or plainly ignoring his past reviews.
The iPhone X- trying to make Face ID fail by unlocking the iPhone X from his waist.
The Apple Watch- the temper tantrum he threw after being flamed.
The pixel 2 retraction- they gave high marks to a defective phone and later retracted
The iPhone X’s:
The camera is a negative?? Not bias whatsoever according to you.

Yeah that has nothing to do with the review..../sarcasm
Care to eat crow now, or are you doubling down that it was a joke....along with the review.