Windows machines are still preferred for supporting a desktop computer or a high-end portable with a better discrete graphics sub-system than any Mac supports. Gamers want a high-end graphics system. Mac laptops did not have the hardware needed or at least optional. 27" iMacs used mobile graphics chips in most cases and integrated graphics in the 21.5" iMac for almost all options. The Mac Pro was too expensive compared to a Windows tower with a high end card. So even if you used a Mac in Boot Camp, the hardware was still poor compared to what was available for a Windows gamer. So with crappy graphics hardware on the Mac side almost always, the gamers used a fancy Windows machine for PC games. A serious gamer will probably also have a xbox and a playstation for those games as well. While the M1 based low-end machines may be marvelous to a Mac user, a gamer will say it shows promise. A M1X or M2, whatever they call the next iteration with a better GPU section, may finally sway a developer to work on a new cool game for the Mac. When a Mac can play at the level of a Windows desktop machine that has a NVIDIA RTX 3000 series graphics card to support the latest games, then we may finally see the Mac attract game developers and thus gamers. Ask anyone about VR goggles. No Macs as their graphics systems all suck compared to what is available to Windows users. Sure there are sucky integrated graphics low end laptops and all in ones that a gamer wouldn't look at. But there are some laptops with graphics chips better than the M1 and desktops with far better cards. For an integrated solution the M1 is great, but the gamers are looking for far more. They are also after faster than 60 Hz refresh rates. This needs a good graphics system that can keep up. Apple may go faster, but unless they support the 120 Hz ProMotion on a Mac, it won't interest a gamer. FYI, ProMotion is available on a iPad Pro, so it's conceivable that a future M1X/M2/M3 Mac can have it too. It uses a lot of power, so I can see a future iMac with a much higher power budget offer it. Of course they have a much higher resolution screen that needs more GPU to actually run, so a double refresh in the same time needs twice the horsepower.