Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

johannnn

macrumors 68020
Nov 20, 2009
2,315
2,603
Sweden
Sorry what does that mean?
After Flash died, basically all videos on the internet was compressed with H264. However, H264 doesn't really work for 4K and above.
To compress 4K videos, Apple is pushing for H265, while Google is pushing for VP9.
Modern  devices have H265 hardware acceleration, so watching 4K H265 videos should be smooth and not drain the battery. However, Google have decided to have their 4k YouTube videos only in VP9.
To watch 4K YouTube on your Mac you will therefore need to use Chrome. Chrome actually shows all their videos (regardless of resolution) in VP9. Hardware acceleration of VP9 is not a thing yet, so Chrome will drain your battery more.

So use the Chrome engine to watch 4K YouTube (so Chrome on iOS is not enough, since it uses the Safari engine).
But don't forget that it will drain your battery more than with Safari, since all videos will be in VP9.

TV also can not watch YouTube in 4K, since it doesn't have VP9 support.

Watching 4K with Firefox is hit-or-miss depending on your machine.

The problem is however not only limited to YouTube. Want to watch Netflix in 4K on your computer? You will need Windows 10 and Microsoft Edge.

TLDL: You should stick watching 1080p...
 
Last edited:

canhaz

macrumors 6502
Jan 17, 2012
310
145
Main thing I'm worried about is the heat double the cores and higher clock brings. The fully maxed i7 13" could easily be hotter and noiser.. or not. Won't know until someone compares.
 

hajime

macrumors 604
Jul 23, 2007
7,934
1,314
After Flash died, basically all videos on the internet was compressed with H264. However, H264 doesn't really work for 4K and above.
To compress 4K videos, Apple is pushing for H265, while Google is pushing for VP9.
Modern  devices have H265 hardware acceleration, so watching 4K H264 videos should be smooth and not drain the battery. However, Google have decided to have their 4k YouTube videos only in VP9.
To watch 4K YouTube on your Mac you will therefore need to use Chrome. Chrome actually shows all their videos (regardless of resolution) in VP9. Hardware acceleration of VP9 is not a thing yet, so Chrome will drain your battery more.

So use the Chrome engine to watch 4K YouTube (so Chrome on iOS is not enough, since it uses the Safari engine).
But don't forget that it will drain your battery more than with Safari, since all videos will be in VP9.

TV also can not watch YouTube in 4K, since it doesn't have VP9 support.

Watching 4K with Firefox is hit-or-miss depending on your machine.

The problem is however not only limited to YouTube. Want to watch Netflix in 4K on your computer? You will need Windows 10 and Microsoft Edge.

TLDL: You should stick watching 1080p...

Thanks. I have a 49" 4K TV. If I get a chance to watch 4K YouTube videos, I want to. Usually I use Firefox as many years ago (over 10 years ago?), Firefox was the best browser for the Mac. So, it is better to use Chrome than Firefox and Safari to watch 4K videos on YouTube?
 

TonyK

macrumors 65816
May 24, 2009
1,032
148
This is a good setup. Going to stick with my 2015 MBP with 16GB memory and 1TB drive only because I also have a TB2 dock from OWC. I'd have to replace it if I replaced my MBP and spent too much money 15 months ago to justify switching again.

I do have one final thought.

CONGRATULATIONS!!!!!!! Sounds like an awesome system and waiting to see how it compares on everyone's wish list of tests.
 

drecc

macrumors member
Nov 6, 2014
85
37
Wondered if you could figure out where the ambient light sensor is that affects the True Tone display please? Most importantly whether it's on the inside and will only function when the lid is opened, or whether it's on the outside and will work even when the lid is closed. You'd probably figure it out by just placing your hand over different parts of the laptop, or by shining a torch on different parts of the laptop to see if the screen adjusts.

If it's on the outside, then people that dock their MBP with the lid closed and use an external monitor will still be able to have the True Tone work on their external monitor. Thanks!
 

vaugha

macrumors 6502a
Nov 3, 2011
611
206
How's the battery life? If you owned a previous year's model, a comparison would be great. I'm reading some early reports that 2018 13" i7 runs ~ 1hr shorter than last year's model.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hitrate

johannnn

macrumors 68020
Nov 20, 2009
2,315
2,603
Sweden
Thanks. I have a 49" 4K TV. If I get a chance to watch 4K YouTube videos, I want to. Usually I use Firefox as many years ago (over 10 years ago?), Firefox was the best browser for the Mac. So, it is better to use Chrome than Firefox and Safari to watch 4K videos on YouTube?
Since those 10 years ago, Firefox has lost market share every single year. Usually that happens for a reason.
And if YouTube is the goal, have in mind that Google doesn't really treat Firefox that good (https://www.zdnet.com/article/firef...-google-to-treat-it-as-a-first-class-citizen/). I'd go for Chrome.

Depending on how you will watch YouTube on your TV, there are other alternatives than Chrome.
Some TV streamers (e.g. Roku and Chromecast Ultra) support 4K YouTube.
Also, many new TVs support it too.
 

hajime

macrumors 604
Jul 23, 2007
7,934
1,314
Since those 10 years ago, Firefox has lost market share every single year. Usually that happens for a reason.
And if YouTube is the goal, have in mind that Google doesn't really treat Firefox that good (https://www.zdnet.com/article/firef...-google-to-treat-it-as-a-first-class-citizen/). I'd go for Chrome.

Depending on how you will watch YouTube on your TV, there are other alternatives than Chrome.
Some TV streamers (e.g. Roku and Chromecast Ultra) support 4K YouTube.
Also, many new TVs support it too.

What is the relationship between Google, Firefox and Youtube?
 

Lipid

macrumors member
Jan 28, 2014
49
1
To watch 4K YouTube on your Mac you will therefore need to use Chrome. Chrome actually shows all their videos (regardless of resolution) in VP9. Hardware acceleration of VP9 is not a thing yet, so Chrome will drain your battery more.

This is a lie, man. Hardware acceleration of VP9 has been introduced since Kaby Lake (7-gen Intel CPU).
Watch this -
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1061...six-notebook-skus-desktop-coming-in-january/3

No matter what you use Chrome or Safari (both are using the same WebKit engine BTW) - all the 4K VP9 videos will be fully hardware accelerated on 7-gen and 8-gen CPUs.
 

bluecoast

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2017
2,256
2,673
What is the relationship between Google, Firefox and Youtube?
An extremely passive aggressive one!

Google give then cash to seem to make sure that they’re the default search engine. I suspect that they also do it to make sure that they don’t get any antitrust cases against them re both search engine and browser dominance.

YT seem to always make their new features first available on Chrome (unsurprisingly) and usually give the excuse that Chrome has the best tech and that that they’ll implement it in other browsers when they catch up.
 

iMacDragon

macrumors 68020
Oct 18, 2008
2,401
735
UK
This is a lie, man. Hardware acceleration of VP9 has been introduced since Kaby Lake (7-gen Intel CPU).
Watch this -
https://www.anandtech.com/show/1061...six-notebook-skus-desktop-coming-in-january/3

No matter what you use Chrome or Safari (both are using the same WebKit engine BTW) - all the 4K VP9 videos will be fully hardware accelerated on 7-gen and 8-gen CPUs.

Except mac os doesn't expose the hardware acceleration of VP9 to the application layer, only h264/h265, unless something has changed.

yep, see: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=644951
 

Hitrate

macrumors 6502
Mar 25, 2009
450
194
Copenhagen
But Chrome is such bloatware. Anywho back on topic: first of all, thanks OP for this thread. I hope someone with the 15” will be equally kind :)

I’d love to see screenshots and real time (not rendering) computing power stress test results

ie how well does it perform for live audio/video streaming with software monitoring and other things that rely on quick snappy non-throttling low buffer short round trip latency type of deal..

I’m not sure which test apps are best for that though?
 
Last edited:

DeanL

macrumors 65816
Original poster
May 29, 2014
1,360
1,296
London
Congratulations! :)

How's heat management? Does it throttle under load quickly and does it get hot? What about fan noise?

It doesn't seem to get much more hot than my Late 2016 MacBook, but the fans do fire up as soon as the work load increases dramatically. It haven't experienced throttling so far :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: canhaz and Glmnet1

poorcody

macrumors 65816
Jul 23, 2013
1,340
1,585

DougFNJ

macrumors 65816
Jan 22, 2008
1,485
1,212
NJ
How did you already get one with this config? Is it available in store?

I looked on the Apple Store website, configuring it to the same specs as OP pick up in store was available. Can’t wait to get mine by Fed Ex tomorrow.
 

DeanL

macrumors 65816
Original poster
May 29, 2014
1,360
1,296
London
How does the keyboard feel?

I had the Late 2016 MacBook, and I loved the keyboard: I really enjoy the 2018–It's more silent.
[doublepost=1531712934][/doublepost]
How did you already get one with this config? Is it available in store?

I looked on the Apple Store website, configuring it to the same specs as OP pick up in store was available. Can’t wait to get mine by Fed Ex tomorrow.

Apple Stores actually do have custom configs in store–It's just that it doesn't show up online available for a pickup. I went to the Apple Store Walden Galleria and they had a bunch :)
[doublepost=1531712980][/doublepost]
Does the bottom get hot under load_

Coming from the base CPU Late 2016 13" MacBook Pro TouchBar, it does get hot faster, but the fans manage.
[doublepost=1531713102][/doublepost]
My questions are the same as many others have asked... how is the heat under load and fan noise?

I have seen these questions asked many times. Is it that difficult to answer?

It gets way hotter than my old Late 2016 MacBook Pro under load obviously, and loud. But not burning hot :)
[doublepost=1531713359][/doublepost]
The only thing keeping me from upgrading from my Mid 2015 15” is the lack of USB-A. How do you manage that?

I had a Late 2016 MacBook, so it's not a change for me.
I basically simply replaced all my USB-A to x by USB-C to x cables to avoid always having to use dongles, but still have a small Aukey USB-C to USB-A adapters for the rare times I have to plug something on my laptop (it is very rare).
I also have a Hyperdrive that includes a SD Card reader, HDMI port and a couple of USB-A ports :)
[doublepost=1531713417][/doublepost]
I'm actually thinking about getting the exact same model just with 512GB SSD as I use external drives for photography / video files. Currently I'm on mid-2014 13" after having mid-2010 before so I think 4-year upgrade is just right for me. Which Macbook Pro have you been upgrading from? Any major differences so far? Thanks!

I have upgraded from the Late 2016 MacBook, so besides the additional power, silent keyboard and T2 chip, there's not much difference for me :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.