I don't get it.
I don't quite understand the appeal or the justification for paying $3098 for a MacBook Air with the 1.8GHz Core 2 Duo and a 64GB SSD when the 15" MacBook Pro with the optional 2.6GHz processor, 4GB of RAM, the 7200rpm 200GB drive, built-in slot load SuperDrive, GeForce 8600M GT (256MB) sells for $51 less (or $3048). NOTE: That's with the $99 four gig memory kit from OWC.
If I get the MacBook Pro, I have a 44% faster CPU, 100% more memory, 6x faster GPU, 78% more VRAM, 27% more screen area, 213% more storage, and 20% longer battery life. it may weigh 2 lbs heavier and be 1/4 inch thicker, but I'll have a laptop that can do the heavy lifting of Photoshop, Excel, Word, Mail, Safari, GoLive, Preview -- all of which I'm running as I write this. Activity Monitor shows 3GB of my 4GB actively in use. And the 200GB drive has only 50GB free.
My point is that, as sexy as the MacBook Air might be, it would be a downgrade that would limit me severely in doing my work. I suppose I could eliminate some things from the hard drive. But System, Applications, Library, and User Library take up 48GB. That doesn't leave much for user files. Maybe 1.8GHz may be fast enough for most functions but 2GB of memory limit is nuts.
I don't get it. Help me understand.