Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
125W Intel desktop chip vs 30W M1 portable chip. It's not even close. Intel excels at generating heat.
True, but it’s also Apple’s desktop chip in the Mac Studio that is currently the best replacement for the 27” iMac.
 
Wow, you somehow ignore the fact that RTX3000 series and soon RTX4000 series that require a separate PSU just for the higher end GPU so that score can go higher? I'm sorry, but any gamer living in Australia right now would like to trade some performance over a much lower power bill because of the rising electricity price.
 
M1 Max compared to an i7 (that could have made it to the 27” iMac) it looks quite disappointing:
>uses Cinebench R23 when it’s known that Apple Silicone always underperforms in it.
>no SPEC which is more reliable.

Trash metrics.
 

M1 series especially M1 Ultra still suffer its GPU performance and it turns out Apple lied about the performance. Yes, the optimization is still a problem but people still believe that M1 series are still performing poorly. Do M1 Ultra really perform just like RTX 3090? How about now? If this continue in 2022 and later, it will be a huge problem. I'm still seeing videos of poor M1 series performance due to lack of optimizations.

Power per watt is the only advantage for M1 series so far but dont we really care more about the performance? At this point, I'm already worrying about the future of M series.
>benchmarks done in OpenCL and Shadow of the Tomb Raider
>only benchmarks shown

Good to know that if I’m running an outdated graphic library or the only game that exists on Macs that the 3090ti will outperform it.
 
>uses Cinebench R23 when it’s known that Apple Silicone always underperforms in it.
>no SPEC which is more reliable.

Trash metrics.
Do you have any unbiased benchmarks where M1 Max outperforms i7 12700K? (Or at least closer in performance?)
 
Do you have any unbiased benchmarks where M1 Max outperforms i7 12700K? (Or at least closer in performance?)


This is gonna require some guesstimation on my part, but I can’t find comprehensive tests on the 12700k specifically, so I’m gonna try and estimate the performance as -10% of the MT of the 12900k (which I feel is generous), and just say that ST is within the margin of error.

From that you can see that the ST performance manages to squeak a win against the M1 Max, (of course, we already knew this.) The MT performance falls behind, not by a devastating amount but not a win for Intel either. If you want for the sake of argument, I’ll call it a draw even though the M1 Max has an extreme performance per watt advantage, and it’s own gpu.

Speaking of which, your original point being that it looks “disappointing” because the 12700k could’ve appeared in the iMac, also ignores the necessity of a dedicated gpu, which would double the power requirements of said iMac for comparable performance.
 
I may buy an M2 Max Studio when they come out.

Even if you could build an Alder Lake i9 System with a 3090 and run MacOS.

It still costs a lot cheaper for the M2 Max Studio. The cost alone of the 3090 video card will kill you.


Great system if your in an apartment in Europe where electric is generally more.

And A PC like above is a major power draw.
 
I run scientific computations. I upgraded from a 2019 Intel MBP to an M1 Pro. The CPU single-thread performance doubled, and the multi-core performance increased like 3 times. Also machine learning performance increased by magnitudes.

Adding: and it does that without whining fans. My previous Intel MBP sounded like a leaf blower with just the slightest challenging computations.
 
The sales data doesn't related to the performance. It's just better than old Intel Macs.
An M1 Mac with 16 GB of unified memory and 8-core graphics has performance equivalent to a higher-end Intel Core i7 or i9 Mac also with 16 GB of RAM. It's a pretty startling but amazing difference, and I still remember how blown away I was by the speed, particularly the way my M1 MacBook Air renders video projects in just one third of the time as my 2012 quad-core i7 Mac Mini (also with 16 GB of RAM).
 
the fastest Fugaku is based on arm and not x86...so whats the future?! :D
HPC SoCs seem to be different from desktop SoCs. I doubt people would argue that x86 is more efficient than ARM, although Frontier is almost 4 times more efficient than Fugaku.

frontier.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
M1 series especially M1 Ultra still suffer its GPU performance and it turns out Apple lied about the performance.
The graphics of the M-SoCs is of course slower or can only keep up in certain scenarios. Furthermore, it lacks features like ray tracing. Nevertheless, the overall package is good in terms of energy consumption, even if Apple's marketing is not correct (or only in certain scenarios).
 
The M1 / M2 family focusses on performance per watt, not on absolute performance.

Hence why I see no point of putting these M1 / M2 family chips in desktops as you are not getting the big advantage of these chips.
 
I may buy an M2 Max Studio when they come out.

Even if you could build an Alder Lake i9 System with a 3090 and run MacOS.

It still costs a lot cheaper for the M2 Max Studio. The cost alone of the 3090 video card will kill you.


Great system if your in an apartment in Europe where electric is generally more.

And A PC like above is a major power draw.

A M1 Max chip is alot slower than a desktop RTX 3090. In some benchmarks, gaming laptops with a mobile RTX 3060 beat the M1 Max even, so probably also the M2 Max.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy

M1 series especially M1 Ultra still suffer its GPU performance and it turns out Apple lied about the performance. Yes, the optimization is still a problem but people still believe that M1 series are still performing poorly. Do M1 Ultra really perform just like RTX 3090? How about now? If this continue in 2022 and later, it will be a huge problem. I'm still seeing videos of poor M1 series performance due to lack of optimizations.

Power per watt is the only advantage for M1 series so far but dont we really care more about the performance? At this point, I'm already worrying about the future of M series.
I actually am using my 2020 iMac, 10 core i9 and 16GB 5700xt for video production because of the graphics in it. I do not trust that the M1 platform can really replace it just quite yet.

I do own a 2021 Macbook Pro M1 Pro, and it is plenty fast, but still have not been able to commit all my resources over to editing with it.

I am hopeful that the graphic wizardry they spoke about at the June 6th keynote on games can translate over to other graphical intensive applications.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark

M1 series especially M1 Ultra still suffer its GPU performance and it turns out Apple lied about the performance. Yes, the optimization is still a problem but people still believe that M1 series are still performing poorly. Do M1 Ultra really perform just like RTX 3090? How about now? If this continue in 2022 and later, it will be a huge problem. I'm still seeing videos of poor M1 series performance due to lack of optimizations.

Power per watt is the only advantage for M1 series so far but dont we really care more about the performance? At this point, I'm already worrying about the future of M series.
Also, reading your replesi you appear to be a troll but i will feed you with this:

IF YOU WANT TO GAME AND WANT THE PERFORMANCE OF A 3090, GET A WINDOWS MACHINE WITH A 3090.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.