Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

pugxiwawa

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2009
535
1,244
If you buy the Sandisk extreme pro you get the same speed as the internal one. I also got the 16 256 because i have a external ssd and i wont pay 240€ for 250 GB. For this amount i can get 2TB with the same speed and use it also on my other pcs
Have you actually benchmarked the speed? Sandisk extreme pro is USB 3.1 gen 2 so it's at minimum 50% slower than the internal SSD. If you go with 512GB or even larger the internal SSD is even faster.
 

nill1234

macrumors 6502
Dec 22, 2012
311
215
Have you actually benchmarked the speed? Sandisk extreme pro is USB 3.1 gen 2 so it's at minimum 50% slower than the internal SSD. If you go with 512GB or even larger the internal SSD is even faster.
The new one has 2000MB/s USB Gen 2 2x2. If thats nit supported xou can get a Thunderbolt 3 Drive with an NVME. The Apple SSD isn’t something special most NVME drives are able to achieve faster speeds. You could get a NVME 1TB with 3500 MB/S read speeds for 70€ Evo 970.
 

Stephen.R

Suspended
Nov 2, 2018
4,356
4,747
Thailand
what kind of issues have you experienced with having an external drive for core storage? Most of what I read has been positive (just wondering)

Well I don’t use any external for “core” storage (ie OS or home folder).

I keep project files (so source code, VM images, etc) on the external m2 I mentioned.

Ive never used a bus powered external drive that hasn’t disconnected randomly at least once in its lifetime. It’s quite annoying when your project files and a running VM are on that drive. I can’t imagine it being less annoying if its your home folder or the whole boot drive that suddenly disconnects.

And of course the oft mentioned hassle of having to carry another device, more weight, it’s harder to use in tight spaces, etc etc.

I use an external drive for work so that when my daily machine has a problem I can literally just unplug, plug it into the laptop that’s laying around somewhere, log in and off I go.
 

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
Why not save with say a $240 2TB external SSD with read/write ~1GB/s?

It's better value than going from 256GB to 512GB.
Because...

#1 - external "up to" 1050MBps doesn't reflect reality

#2 - internal SSD is a helluva lot faster

#3 - externals are inconvenient to use on a regular/normal basis while working away from a desk. Not impossible, but internal storage is far more convenient

#3a - I don't need to penny pinch - The cost of going from 256 or 512 to 1T internal vs cost of an external SSD is immaterial to me relative to the convenience/annoyance factor.


MBP internal:

Screen Shot 2020-11-30 at 10.24.21 AM.png


Sandisk Extreme 1T External (rated up to 1050MBps)

Screen Shot 2020-11-30 at 10.28.09 AM.png
 

gank41

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2008
4,350
5,022
I’m waiting on delivery of an M1 MBP 16GB/2TB, which will be replacing my 2015 MBP 15in 16GB/2TB. So, opposite of base model...

As to the why, I do a lot of audio recording outside and about using a Blue Yeti Pro USB mic. Sometimes 3 Blue Yeti Pro’s and a Blue Snowball mic when indoors at my friends studio. I like keeping everything local, not having to worry about yet another cable or something using a USB Port. The Blue Yetis and the Snowball mic get all their power over USB, which is great! But I’ve found I need my MBP to be plugged in to get the best performance. Fine for one mic on the go, and everything works even better in the studio. Being able to pack up and carry most everything in one trip is great. Adding a drive to my bag means I need to take more care and make more room. More cables in a bag of cables...

I’ve also been burned before on failing external drives. Actually, many times now that I look back. But quite surprisingly not so often on the drives in my Macs. And very early on (with Windows) I lost all of my recording library...
When at home I keep my laptop docked and connected to a hub with multiple external drives for storage, media, and 3 Time Machine Backups. Plus 2 CCC backups of my recordings (which is in addition to my Time Machine backups). Knowing I’ve got the maxed out model today and that it just can’t be upgraded at all, is fine for me now and will be even better for me 5 years from now. The only reason I’m replacing my 2015 MBP is because of the battery. Still works great otherwise! I’m hoping to get as much use out of this new M1 MBP, hopefully more.

Anyway, sorry for the long post. External storage can be cheap in price & in quality, and to your point initially about basically offloading everything to either an external drive or to the cloud, sometimes I’m somewhere where I might not have an internet connection and might only have my backpack with my laptop and a mic. Having my entire recording library going back close to 15+ years, and not worrying about another piece of equipment is extremely handy for me. I’m a digital pack rat lol
 

pugxiwawa

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2009
535
1,244
The new one has 2000MB/s USB Gen 2 2x2. If thats nit supported xou can get a Thunderbolt 3 Drive with an NVME. The Apple SSD isn’t something special most NVME drives are able to achieve faster speeds. You could get a NVME 1TB with 3500 MB/S read speeds for 70€ Evo 970.
It's all theoretical speed on paper (look at post above for real world benchmark), not to mention to achieve anywhere close to that number you will need a decent Thunderbolt 3 enclosure first. That itself is at least $120+ if not more. Also, you are not going to get 3500 MB/s from any external drive, I tried many, and would be lucky to even get 1500-1900 mb/s. It's misleading to say the external ssd can perform as well as Apple internal SSD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy James

ruslan120

macrumors 65816
Jul 12, 2009
1,417
1,139
Well I don’t use any external for “core” storage (ie OS or home folder).

I keep project files (so source code, VM images, etc) on the external m2 I mentioned.

Ive never used a bus powered external drive that hasn’t disconnected randomly at least once in its lifetime. It’s quite annoying when your project files and a running VM are on that drive. I can’t imagine it being less annoying if its your home folder or the whole boot drive that suddenly disconnects.

And of course the oft mentioned hassle of having to carry another device, more weight, it’s harder to use in tight spaces, etc etc.

I use an external drive for work so that when my daily machine has a problem I can literally just unplug, plug it into the laptop that’s laying around somewhere, log in and off I go.

oof random disconnects would be horrible.
haven’t seen too many on a 2TB usb NVMe but definitely seen a few - you’re right.

am grateful for the response and info, ty
 

TrueBlou

macrumors 601
Sep 16, 2014
4,531
3,619
Scotland
oof random disconnects would be horrible.
haven’t seen too many on a 2TB usb NVMe but definitely seen a few - you’re right.

am grateful for the response and info, ty

They are a pita, I’ve rarely experienced them with my 1TB SSD, but I did have one happen the other day, about three quarters of the way through transferring a few hundred GB..... I was not pleased.

That’s why I like enough on-device storage to handle all of my files/photos/video/apps while leaving a decent amount of headroom for some more temporary items.
 

nill1234

macrumors 6502
Dec 22, 2012
311
215
It's all theoretical speed on paper (look at post above for real world benchmark), not to mention to achieve anywhere close to that number you will need a decent Thunderbolt 3 enclosure first. That itself is at least $120+ if not more. Also, you are not going to get 3500 MB/s from any external drive, I tried many, and would be lucky to even get 1500-1900 mb/s. It's misleading to say the external ssd can perform as well as Apple internal SSD.
OFC you won't get 3500MB/S from an external drive, but the upgrade costs are so rediculous and you won't notice that much of a difference in speed. But ofc if you transfer every day 500gb of data then you would notice it. The MBA M1 is just my streaming and coding machine. My movies and other stuff is on an external drive and on my main Windows PC. With iCloud and optimized storage I still have plenty of storage left. If the MB is your main computer get the 1TB option, even the 512 wouldn't be enough for me.
If I need some data I just plug my SSD in and im good to go.
 

Hexley

Suspended
Original poster
Jun 10, 2009
1,641
505
Because...

#1 - external "up to" 1050MBps doesn't reflect reality

#2 - internal SSD is a helluva lot faster

#3 - externals are inconvenient to use on a regular/normal basis while working away from a desk. Not impossible, but internal storage is far more convenient

#3a - I don't need to penny pinch - The cost of going from 256 or 512 to 1T internal vs cost of an external SSD is immaterial to me relative to the convenience/annoyance factor.


MBP internal:

View attachment 1683348

Sandisk Extreme 1T External (rated up to 1050MBps)

View attachment 1683351
I was expecting it be more like ~950MB/s. Not that low. :|
 

jerryk

macrumors 604
Nov 3, 2011
7,421
4,208
SF Bay Area
Why not save with say a $240 2TB external SSD with read/write ~1GB/s?

It's better value than going from 256GB to 512GB.
I think if you plan on owning the M1 system for a while upgrading the SD and/or memory is not a bad idea. But do that knowing that the M1 is the 1st of a new generation of Mac processors. I anticipate the SOC on a 14" or 16" MBP will be quite a bit more powerful. So I am purchasing the base MB Air as a first step, but will likely add a 14" when they become available.
 

pugxiwawa

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2009
535
1,244
Whats your intention running a benchmark all day long, this is not slow at all. You can also get a Thunderbolt 3 drive.
not slow is relative. The point is internal SSD is MUCH faster than any external hard drive you are going to be attaching, and to claim it's 'as fast as' Apple's internal SSD is just not factual.

Also ram is limited regardless you go with 8GB or 16GB model, so there will be swapping going on to the internal SSD. You don't want to have the SSD filled close to max and that will really impact the performance of whole system.
 

LonestarOne

macrumors 65816
Sep 13, 2019
1,074
1,426
McKinney, TX
It’s an additional $200 for a machine I’ll use for at least the next 5 years. That’s $3.33 a month.

512GB guarantees I will have enough space for the software I need to install and working files. For larger storage, I have a personal cloud, which also allows sharing files between my laptop, iPad, iPhone, and iMac.
 

Jimmy James

macrumors 603
Oct 26, 2008
5,489
4,067
Magicland
Because I then have to carry a cable and external hard drive everywhere? What do I do? velcro it onto my laptop?

I guess I should also not bother with any laptop screen larger than 13" and Just buy an external display I take with me?

Having a single device and knowing everything is on it is worth the small price increase. Pickup laptop, done.
Also consider your external input devices and speakers. May want to upgrade that webcam while you’re at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: revs

pugxiwawa

macrumors 6502a
Nov 10, 2009
535
1,244
@pugxiwawa The Samsung X5 is as fast as my 256GB internal one. But everyone has to decide. I only store stuff that I don't need regularly for me 16GB RAM is more important but that's just my opinion.
Yes Samsung X5 is fast, but still not as fast as internal SSD. I have one and used it as my iMac boot drive. It works fine. But how much is the X5? Once you factor that in I think it makes sense to just go with Apple's upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fourthtunz

BjoernInTheSeventies

macrumors newbie
Nov 30, 2020
12
7
Because...

#1 - external "up to" 1050MBps doesn't reflect reality

#2 - internal SSD is a helluva lot faster

#3 - externals are inconvenient to use on a regular/normal basis while working away from a desk. Not impossible, but internal storage is far more convenient

#3a - I don't need to penny pinch - The cost of going from 256 or 512 to 1T internal vs cost of an external SSD is immaterial to me relative to the convenience/annoyance factor.


MBP internal:

View attachment 1683348

Sandisk Extreme 1T External (rated up to 1050MBps)

View attachment 1683351

This sums up my thoughts rather nicely. ... I ordered the Mac Mini M1 with 16GB RAM and 2 TB Storage two weeks ago (coming from Mac Mini 2012 16GB 512GB SSD). I just wanted to have all my photos stored on the Mini with no hassles and also be (for a certain time) future proof.
 

armoured

macrumors regular
Feb 1, 2018
211
163
ether
Real life example, trying to get anything done while travelling. Painful as anything to stop what you're doing, eject a drive and start over later. Can't leave an external drive hanging off while juggling stuff.

My specific case is photography - travel, take a lot of photos, want to edit and cull while getting in and out of trains, plains, coffee shops, you name it. Also travel with some previous projects that I'll be working on.

Try that with an external drive: absolute nightmare. Every time you want to shut down/pause, you can't really trust doing it with sleeping with an external drive and sticking it in a bag.

Doing something that takes a lot of time? No way you want to stop it, quit your main program, eject, then repeat the process again - not efficient unless you have a stable place and a chunk of time.

I've also had some things underway I can't afford to interrupt and sit there praying it will finish in time for me to get on a plane or whatever.
 
Last edited:

deeddawg

macrumors G5
Jun 14, 2010
12,468
6,571
US
I was expecting it be more like ~950MB/s. Not that low. :|
The external is a bit faster on my Intel MBA, not sure why. Also tried with the 5GBps and 10GBps ports on my Caldigit TS3+ - the M1 MBP showed similar speed for 10G, and half that for 5G.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.