Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
I don’t care about the SD/HDMI ports, can see how they are useful in a pinch but we have had many years to get used to having dongles it’s fine

However I am annoyed about MagSafe as I have no need for it, and the real annoyance is losing a TB port for it… now I have to carry a type-c hub around…
If connected to a monitor that can deliver power, MagSafe won’t be used much.
 

AdonisSMU

macrumors 604
Original poster
Oct 23, 2010
7,320
3,078
Not everybody drank the Kool-Aid. These new MacBook Pros are going to sell like hotcakes not just because of the performance gains but because Apple finally listened to Pros. I suspect that this change was driven, at least in part, by internal Apple employees complaining about the need for dongles when these two ports are ubiquitous, and will remain so for a VERY long time. If I was in the market, I would have liked to see at least one USB-A in there too.


Agreed, but now the cable is separate from the brick, which was the problem in the first place. And the ability to charge via USB-C remains, so there is really nothing to complain about here.


Sure, it's good. But having only that means custom cables and dongles. Now you can get on site and use what's there (well, you may still need a USB-A to USB-C dongle or cable, but that's it).


There's always some of us that will feel this way. I still wish that Apple merely updated the 17" MBP with current chips and ports instead of soldering RAM and SSDs way back in 2012.

Still, I feel these new MBPs are far and away the best machines Apple's EVER built. Pro machines for Pros. These things are desktop replacements again.

You can always go with the one-port-type, thin, ultrabook, Air line.

I'm glad Apple FINALLY figured out that not all their laptops need to be ultrabooks.
Using one standard everyone has an incentive conform to that. Instead we get to have a weird mishmash of connectors.

Everyone was already going to buy the new MacBooks with or without the extra ports because theyve already found work arounds. Im a pro user and I prefer not to have ports that is over very little use especially if it doesnt conform to a standard like usb-c thats universal and ubiquitous and only becoming more so.

Apple was thinking into the future.

A MacBook Pro is still a freaking laptop at the end of the day. Yeah it has some desktop level performance in some cases but that doesnt mean you need to make it a desktop by adding unnecessary ports for the .000001% who might use it twice.

Its like Apple lost the confidence to follow through on a consistent vision for the future.

What are ultra books?
 
Last edited:

AdonisSMU

macrumors 604
Original poster
Oct 23, 2010
7,320
3,078
HDMI dongles are notoriously finicky and unreliable. They often don’t connect or don’t support full resolution or flicker. Having a proper HDMI port on this will help a lot of people in heterogenous corporate environment where you may be issued a monitor that only supports HDMI or you may end up in a meeting room and the projector is HDMI. It helps to have a reliable connection in those circumstances.
I guess if your corporation has a hard time progressing past 2006. ??‍♂️??‍♂️

People were already dealing with the issues with hdmi and working around it.
 
  • Haha
  • Angry
Reactions: Rashy and NC12

flapflapflap

macrumors 6502a
Dec 13, 2013
768
439
Using one standard everyone has an incentive conform to that. Instead we get to have a weird mishmash of connectors.

Everyone was already going to buy the new MacBooks with or without the extra ports because theyve already found work arounds. Im a pro user and I prefer not to have ports that is over very little use especially if it doesnt conform to a standard like usb-c thats universal and ubiquitous and only becoming more so.

Apple was thinking into the future.

A MacBook Pro is still a freaking laptop at the end of the day. Yeah it has some desktop level performance in some cases but that doesnt mean you need to make it a desktop by adding unnecessary ports for the .000001% who might use it twice.

Its like Apple lost the confidence to follow through on a consistent vision for the future.

What are ultra books?
Somewhat agree. I capitulated last night and ordered the 14 and 16 with same day delivery. I can tolerate the extra chunk, given that these will stay home most of the time, but the port situation is very strange. Definitely not forward thinking. Apple probably added the ports and made this super thick to play the retro inspiration card and exploit its sheep for a few years of good profits before reverting to a thinner, more forward thinking MBP. In 3-5 years, when Apple releases another brand new MBP, it will be thinner and it will not have the SD card slot/HDMI and people will praise and salute Apple and give them more of their money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdonisSMU

AdonisSMU

macrumors 604
Original poster
Oct 23, 2010
7,320
3,078
This philosophical battle has been raging since 2016. The opposing philosophy has won this round. Be happy Apple didn’t totally cave and put useless ass USB-A Ports on the new MacBook Pro. Or Ethernet.
I feel like Apple couldve cut down on cost. Its like they did like 10 good things then added 3 bad things.

Its like adding the cord back to the airpods. ??‍♂️ It doesnt make any sense. It feels like Apple lost its confidence. The 2016-2020 MacBook Pros were flying off the shelves despite all the naysayers. No reason to go backwards in time.
 

puelocesar

macrumors member
Mar 11, 2013
74
39
The hdmi and sd card port on these is totally unnecessary. WTF?! Everyone already bought connectors for these items over the last 5 years.

MagSafe was a mess. Yeah it was branded well but I didnt like it because my cables were always ruined and I had to spend a lot of money replacing it. Imo TB3/4 works great and haven’t had to replace it once.

Good grief… ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️ That was a step backwards and for very little gain. The size is perfect. Apple could’ve added more battery capacity.
That reads so much like parody that I kept waiting for the /s in the end
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Using one standard everyone has an incentive conform to that. Instead we get to have a weird mishmash of connectors.

Everyone was already going to buy the new MacBooks with or without the extra ports because theyve already found work arounds. Im a pro user and I prefer not to have ports that is over very little use especially if it doesnt conform to a standard like usb-c thats universal and ubiquitous and only becoming more so.

Apple was thinking into the future.

A MacBook Pro is still a freaking laptop at the end of the day. Yeah it has some desktop level performance in some cases but that doesnt mean you need to make it a desktop by adding unnecessary ports for the .000001% who might use it twice.

What are ultra books?
Just imagine that Apple actually did some market research before making the design decision to add ports....they presumably didn't ask you personally, but I bet they looked into it.

Yes, USB-C is all fine and dandy, but it's also a confusing standard....can you tell the difference between a cable to supports USB 3.0, 3.1 gen1, 3.1 gen2, 3.1 gen2x2, 3.2, 4.0 even USB 2.0? That will support power delivery or DisplayPort video, or Ethernet? I already have a collection of different USB-C cables for different things - some charge some devices, others don't. Some only transfer data at USB 2.0 speeds....you get my drift.

The target audience for the MBP is tilted towards media consumption and creation, other users that need good performance and for other professionals who just want a reliable and robust computer. So it makes good sense to have some "commonly used ports" . I suspect a lot of MacBook Pro users enjoy photography or videography, and what the most common media for consumer/pro-sumer cameras? Yes, SD cards. They may also want to project said media to a domestic TV or "average" external monitors. What do these nearly always have? HDMI. What projector connection is mostly commonly found in corporate meeting rooms? HDMI.

In other words, Apple made this computer for people like me. The new (old) ports will be more convenient for me and add some value. And I bet there a lot of similar people in their target market...this is why you have ports.
 

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Somewhat agree. I capitulated last night and ordered the 14 and 16 with same day delivery. I can tolerate the extra chunk, given that these will stay home most of the time, but the port situation is very strange. Definitely not forward thinking. Apple probably added the ports and made this super thick to play the retro inspiration card and exploit its sheep for a few years of good profits before reverting to a thinner, more forward thinking MBP. In 3-5 years, when Apple releases another brand new MBP, it will be thinner and it will not have the SD card slot/HDMI and people will praise and salute Apple and give them more of their money.
Imagine you are Apple and you want to sell your new computers to as many people as possible.

You conduct your market research and find that a lot of people say they they want plug their computers into HDMI screens and upload their photos without having to buy a dongle.

You have 2 choices:
1) "Traditional Apple response": "those are old standards - the new ones are much better so we going to look to the future, so you need to live with dongles until the rest of the world catches up". Bear in mind that they moved to USB-C in 2016 and in most cases, the world has not yet caught up in many places - only the most expensive monitors have USB-C inputs, but nearly all have HDMI. There are still a lot of USB-A peripherals and cables around. External drives (particularly SSDs) are better - a lot of these are now USB-C

2) "New Apple response": "USB-C adoption has been slower than we expected. people want a combination of the new and the familiar - by giving them both we keep the majority of our users happy, without sacrificing too much of the new stuff".

Apple decided that they will sell more MBPs with option (2). End of Story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy and Tagbert

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,638
Indonesia
The hdmi and sd card port on these is totally unnecessary. WTF?! Everyone already bought connectors for these items over the last 5 years.

MagSafe was a mess. Yeah it was branded well but I didnt like it because my cables were always ruined and I had to spend a lot of money replacing it. Imo TB3/4 works great and haven’t had to replace it once.

Good grief… ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️ That was a step backwards and for very little gain. The size is perfect. Apple could’ve added more battery capacity.
As the first gen of the Apple Silicon Pro lineup, Apple has to make them truly appealing to the influencers. Thus the SD card and HDMI ports, while ignoring the fact that the new Macbook Pro lose one Thunderbolt port.
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,638
Indonesia
Imo, people made a big deal about Apple's "dongle problem" simply because Apple doesn't include any dongles with the Macbooks. You have to purchase them separately. Meanwhile, dongles are also commonplace in the Windows world, yet you don't have as loud as the complaints on Apple. I'm guessing it's because majority of Windows laptop OEMs include a basic dongle (usually USB-C to HDMI/USB-A) with the laptop.

Instead of putting back HDMI and SD card slot, I'd prefer Apple to put in additional USB-C/YB ports, and just bundle in an HDMI/USB-A dongle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jz0309

bluecoast

macrumors 68020
Nov 7, 2017
2,256
2,673
These are proper professional content creation & app development machines & not prosumer machines. Thus the ports are for what these professionals tell Apple they need.

I’m not any of the above, but I know that trying to connect machines without HDMI ports at places Ive worked for presentations, has been a nightmare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy

Fomalhaut

macrumors 68000
Oct 6, 2020
1,993
1,724
Imo, people made a big deal about Apple's "dongle problem" simply because Apple doesn't include any dongles with the Macbooks. You have to purchase them separately. Meanwhile, dongles are also commonplace in the Windows world, yet you don't have as loud as the complaints on Apple. I'm guessing it's because majority of Windows laptop OEMs include a basic dongle (usually USB-C to HDMI/USB-A) with the laptop.

Instead of putting back HDMI and SD card slot, I'd prefer Apple to put in additional USB-C/YB ports, and just bundle in an HDMI/USB-A dongle.
I think you mean HDMI/USB-C dongle don't you? These are relatively expensive and some of them are quite large.

I can see that people who use all 4 USB-C ports will feel that they are getting less value out of the ports. I think Apple's approach was to give (most) people back a USB-C port by giving them MagSafe. So you still have 3 usable TB3 ports plus are able to plug an external screen into the HDMI. For the majority of people, I assume this would a net win.

For my use I was nearly always using one USB-C for power because my hub couldn't supply 96W. It would trickle charge, but under load, the battery would still run down.

On my MBP16, I would typically have:

TB 1: power
TB 2: display 1 (or connect to dock)
TB 3: display 2 / external disk (media, backup etc.)
TB 4: Other peripherals, e.g. camera capture dongle, SD card reader, audio-interface, 2nd external disk

I would fairly often run into the situation where I had my two screens connected and wanted to copy from one external device to another. Have to unplug the power or one screen.

In the new world

MagSafe: power
TB 1: display 1 (or connect to dock)
TB 2: external disk or device
TB 3: 2nd external disk or device
HDMI: display 2
SD: camera media

So the new configuration is better for me.

I'm still using FHD/QHD 60Hz displays so HDMI 2.0 is quite sufficient for the foreseeable future.
 

loby

macrumors 68000
Jul 1, 2010
1,882
1,514
I am OK with the SD card port. Photographers will dig it. But HDMI...eh.
HDMI is good if you want to hook up to a monitor instead of using USB-C on-the-go quickly. Also, macOS Monterey seems to fix some of the issues with HDMI coloring and clarity with my LG 27UL850-W monitor using HDMI (to my surprise).

If you are out on a set or at a conference or doing a presentation etc., the ports comes in handy. You don't have to fumble around looking for a doggle. SD card slot is nice and I would use it for quickly reviewing of a shot. Again, when in a hurry, you don't have to grab a doggle.

Saying all of that...I have doggles now for what I need and prefer four USB-C ports since I had already adjusted (or "evolved" my workflow) to accommodate using USB-C. Even USB flash drives etc. I am use to an all USB-C world now and like it. It was a pain a few years ago when I was "made" to evolve...but eventually now like it. I also, like the "thin" lighter laptop...but compensating for thermals and thickness...I can live with "thicker and more power"!

The MagSafe is a plus. I was saved just a few weeks ago when a clumsy person ran into my power cord. I was using an old MacBook Air 2013 at the time and the power cord ripped-out of the side, leaving the laptop unmoved on the table during a presentation. Saved me having to buy a new MacBook Air. Also, you can charge also using the USB-C ports, so you are not limited to the left side.

Looks like Apple brought in some "real" Pros and said, "Ok..we get it...what do you need?" And they listened.

This is the laptop I would have love to buy when I bought my MacBook Pro 2018 fully loaded when it came out...(I still like it, including the touch bar...(don't throw eggs at my comment) :)

But...I am NOW looking to some how figure out why NOT to get this almost perfect "minus the notch" work-horse that I need for video editing...cutting my time down more than half or more...

Now...the harder sell...convincing my wife... :)
 

ian87w

macrumors G3
Feb 22, 2020
8,704
12,638
Indonesia
I think you mean HDMI/USB-C dongle don't you? These are relatively expensive and some of them are quite large.
Apple's USB-C to HDMI+USB-A dongle is $69. Windows laptop OEMs like HP, Lenovo, Asus, Dell, tend to include this type of dongle with their laptops. So in reality, it is not that expensive. It's just Apple milking their own customers.
 

cupcakes2000

macrumors 601
Apr 13, 2010
4,037
5,429
Having a SD card reader, those in the video and photographic industry will buy these machines in droves in my opinion because that is the one thing that is universal in that industry, storing video and photos onto SD cards. People in that industry are fed up with having to carry USB SD card adapters with them, in my opinion.
Most proper pro cameras don’t use these cards, or only these at least. Those that do are in the second card slot and generally for back up. All photographers that value their time use external card readers.
Agreed. Even the Pros who have CF cameras use SDs anyway for the rest of the equipment.
What is the ‘rest of the equipment’?
Or looking at it another way, why should you get 4 ports you want, when that means others will get 0 ports they want?
Those 4 ports can be anything anyone wants.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Rashy and Clix Pix

Andropov

macrumors 6502a
May 3, 2012
746
990
Spain
What is the ‘rest of the equipment’?
Main cameras with secondary SD slots (Canon's 5D Mark IV, for example, has Compact Flash + SD card in the same camera), secondary cameras with SD-only, audio recorders that record to SD cards, GoPros/action cameras, drones... pretty much everything except flashes, really.
 

phr1610

macrumors newbie
Oct 25, 2021
10
5
The hdmi and sd card port on these is totally unnecessary. WTF?! Everyone already bought connectors for these items over the last 5 years.

MagSafe was a mess. Yeah it was branded well but I didnt like it because my cables were always ruined and I had to spend a lot of money replacing it. Imo TB3/4 works great and haven’t had to replace it once.

Good grief… ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️ That was a step backwards and for very little gain. The size is perfect. Apple could’ve added more battery capacity.
LOLZ.

You are going to get so much pushback on here.

See...the majority of Macbook Pro users really, really want a dedicated power connection that is proprietary, but where you don't have to worry about someone tripping over the cord!

Except if you're charging via one of the USB-C ports, in which case you then, in fact, do need to worry!

And antiquated SD card slots/HDMI ports? I mean...I am **shocked** Apple didn't include audio ports that haven't been used since the 70s!

I mean...a "pro" device should really have every conceivable port, amiright?

And it's not like USB-C can do anything but transfer both power and data. So there's that.

And the lovely thickness of these machines, Apple should've made them **thicker** in my opinion.

Full-size f-keys are also **muah** chef's kiss! So necessary!

And that design! It's like looking at a 2003-era Powerbook, such a lovely design. It's like looking at the future, through the past!

In no way am I being sarcastic and implying that these ugly pieces of sh*t are a huge step backward and proof that Jony Ive should never have left the company!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SpotOnT

SpotOnT

macrumors 65816
Dec 7, 2016
1,032
2,175
Those 4 ports can be anything anyone wants.

Ok, following that logic, these 3 Thunderbolt ports can be anything anyone wants, including 4 Thunderbolt ports. I mean if you are happy using dongles and docks, you can have as many Thunderbolt ports as you want (well up to 6 anyway, if you want to keep the same bandwidth as previous generations of MacBook Pro).

I honestly can't tell what is your loss here. If you don't like SD card slots, MagSafe, HDMI, than do use it. You have 3 full channel Thunderbolt ports than can be anything you want. You can even charge from them. There is no functionally removed for you.

Meanwhile, for the rest of us who like having things built in for diverse needs, we have more options.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Rashy and Tagbert

Adarna

Suspended
Jan 1, 2015
685
429
The hdmi and sd card port on these is totally unnecessary. WTF?! Everyone already bought connectors for these items over the last 5 years.

MagSafe was a mess. Yeah it was branded well but I didnt like it because my cables were always ruined and I had to spend a lot of money replacing it. Imo TB3/4 works great and haven’t had to replace it once.

Good grief… ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️ That was a step backwards and for very little gain. The size is perfect. Apple could’ve added more battery capacity.
The ports selection perfect today. From 2016-2020 it wasn't.
 

canpoyrazoglu

macrumors newbie
Aug 2, 2019
22
16
The hdmi and sd card port on these is totally unnecessary. WTF?! Everyone already bought connectors for these items over the last 5 years.

MagSafe was a mess. Yeah it was branded well but I didnt like it because my cables were always ruined and I had to spend a lot of money replacing it. Imo TB3/4 works great and haven’t had to replace it once.

Good grief… ??‍♂️??‍♂️??‍♂️ That was a step backwards and for very little gain. The size is perfect. Apple could’ve added more battery capacity.
Exactly my thougts. Many would have needed HDMI and SD, I get it. Me and many others need a CF reader, microSD reader without an adapter that I'd lose so let's add them too. I'm pretty sure that many people still want USB-A too. Going one-port-for-all solved all the problems as Apple can't make everyone happy.

Even though I've ordered the new one, I'd really, really have preferred the 4 USB-C ports and the touch bar that I loved, insead of HDMI, SD, and MagSafe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stridr69

canpoyrazoglu

macrumors newbie
Aug 2, 2019
22
16
Yes, but you already have 3 x Thunderbolt ports with full bandwidth. If you are happy using dongles, just get some splitters and you have 6 x Thunderbolt ports with the same speed as previous generations of MacBook Pro (each Thunderbolt 4 port in this new MacBook gets it own dedicated channel).

So again I ask, if you are happy using dongles, what is your loss? You are in no way negatively impacted by the addition of these new ports.

Meanwhile, for the rest of us who like having things built in for diverse needs, we have more ports.
Aesthetics? Bulkiness? Many prefer Apple because of aesthetics and thinness, which has been a major step back with the latest ones.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rashy

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,643
4,469
The usual selfish posts "I don't need these ports, so why did Apple bother?" or "I have already bought plenty of dongles, what do I do with them now?"
I don't have a use for SD cards but I know how much nicer it must be for all those using cameras not to have to use a dongle.
And as a teacher and presenter, I love having HDMI. Projectors are either VGA or HDMI, If you have HDMI you only need a very small VGA adapter. That's what I have done with my Windows laptop with HDMI. With USB C only you need hubs or several dongles.
Pushing USB C over USB A I am all for it. But USB C is not replacing video connectos in projectors (or even in many monitors) anytime soon (projectors are not replaced often or at all...). Nor USB C is a replacement for a SD card reader...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.