so spend that $200.....Friends don't let friends suffer with 8GB RAM. M2 256GB is bad but 8GB RAM is even worse.
$1199 M1 MBA 16GB/256GB > $1399 M2 MBA 16GB/256GB > $1199 M2 MBA 8GB/256GB
so spend that $200.....Friends don't let friends suffer with 8GB RAM. M2 256GB is bad but 8GB RAM is even worse.
$1199 M1 MBA 16GB/256GB > $1399 M2 MBA 16GB/256GB > $1199 M2 MBA 8GB/256GB
There’s no problem with their passive cooling and moving away from a fan was deliberate. This is a useless suggestion.
If we call it Turbo Boost is it OK then?Chips shouldn’t be thermal throttling in the first place.
It really can't. At least not under heavy load.The 16” can run the M1 Max chip without using the fans.
No it is not. Chips shouldn’t be thermal throttling in the first place.
A fan in the MBA would be a much better computer.
At what load? M1 Max can consume up to 30W CPU + 60W GPU so highly doubtful any passive cooling can dissipate 90W of heat.
If we call it Turbo Boost is it OK then?
It really can't. At least not under heavy load.
It is just as ridiculous to claim that a MBA can only be used for light tasks as it is to claim that it useless because it throttles. Both are extreme takes that ignore the broad abilities of the MBA.You are using the MBA wrong!! You should use your $1500+ MBA as a $250 Chromebook!!
Apple should simply install a fan or fix their passive cooling for the next generation M3 MBA. The MBA used to have a fan in the past.
What nonsense. Stop offering thoughts.No it is not. Chips shouldn’t be thermal throttling in the first place.
Chips shouldn’t be thermal throttling in the first place.
A fan or better passive cooling in the MBA would be a much better computer.
Something most windows users have owned for years lol. My wifes blade 15 lives on oneIf you really need to do heavy work on a MBA,
problem solved
Must say I use air m2 a lot and no real issues. Surprised after reading all these post 😂It is just as ridiculous to claim that a MBA can only be used for light tasks as it is to claim that it useless because it throttles. Both are extreme takes that ignore the broad abilities of the MBA.
You can use the MBA to do pretty much any task. For most tasks, it will run cool and fast. If you need to do video editing, 3D modeling, or games, it will do those too. It may not be as fast as a MBP for those tasks. After a while, it may reach its thermal limits and slow down. It will continue to do those tasks, it just won’t be as fast as a MBP while doing them. If you need to do those kinds of tasks every day, you would probably be better off getting a MBP. If you only do those tasks occasionally then the minor slowing probably won’t matter and the MBA would still work for you.
this is not a failure of the MBA. There is always a trade off between portability and power. The MBA was designed to be more portable at the cost of a sacrifice a small amount of power in extreme cases. That is a trade off that many people are happy to make.
If you want Apple to add a fan so you can get that extra power in those specialized tasks, they already did that in the M2 13” MBP. For nearly the same price you get a laptop in a similar size and same guts but with a fan. The downside is that it is not as portable as the MBA. It is on the other side of that portability vs power trade off. If that is what you want, it is right there. If not, you can choose the Air. Trying to insist on both maximum portability and maximum power is just ignoring the physics. Adding a fan to The MBA would make it less portable and more like the MBP would be redundant.
No it is not. Chips shouldn’t be thermal throttling in the first place.
Must say I use air m2 a lot and no real issues. Surprised after reading all these post 😂
Haha. Yes - 256?Same! I've written many times before all the stuff I did on mine since getting it. It's a mini-powerhouse. I ran sims in Houdini on it for hours, I edited and rendered 4k video in Final Cut, worked with music in Logic (20 tracks just fine! I didn't even bother doing more because I got bored adding them), Animating and rendering in Blender, tons of work in Xcode, and playing video games.
This thing handled it all like a champ.
You definitely want them to throttle. This is something all chips do as a safety measure. In the old days the chips just melted.
Not expecting any throttling isn't realistic.
Look. The MBA is obviously not for you. You want max performance at all times and won’t accept anything less even to make the device more portable. That’s fine. Apple makes several computers that should serve your needs.No you don’t want it to happen. You want a chassis that is appropriately designed for the chip. But I know that Apple customers find it normal as Apple has a long history of designing computers that are not appropriate for the chip inside.
And not all chips are thermal throttling. Apple Silicon computers (except for the MBA and the 14 MBP with the 32-core GPU) are not thermal throttling. The fans don’t even turn on some Apple Silicon models.
That is what is attractive about Apple Silicon computers in general, they stay silent and cool while delivering all that power. Laptops with a RTX 3080 sound like jet engines by comparison and are super hot. If you let computers like the 16” M1 Max MacBook Pro thermal throttle (and thus being hot and loud like PC’s), what’s the point then?
Many of us are experts in our field and have been in them for decades, which is why we’re telling you throttling is normal. This has literally nothing to do with apple all processors will throttle.It looks like Apple made a mistake getting rid of Ive. Seems like macrumors think computers should thermal throttle, and Ive is the expert of making such computers.
You want a chassis that is appropriately designed for the chip.
You are right to call BS. I have a 16" M1 Max and have heard them plenty. Moderate loads up to about 20 watts don't usually spin the fans, but as power gets up towards 30W they'll turn on. All-core CPU loads and most GPU loads will definitely spin the fans.So are you saying that thin and light laptops shouldn't exist and that all chassis should be desktop or larger form factor and come with exotic or liquid cooling systems to squeeze every last drop of performance from the chip without it ever getting hot enough to throttle?
EDIT: Fans not ever coming on with the 14" and 16" models? I call BS.
No you don’t want it to happen. You want a chassis that is appropriately designed for the chip.
Seems like macrumors think computers should thermal throttle
AMD demoed their 8c/16t mobile chips at CES 2020 IIRC, way before any M1 product was released & the first products were launched mid 2020 which again is about 2 quarters before the M1. Neither Intel nor AMD were competing with M1 at the time & even now with a slight node disadvantage they're generally good enough for what they offer!Intel and AMD did not offer and 8-core low power laptops, but today they have 8-core and 12-core chips, even though process density have not doubled at all. They do it now because that's the only way to compete with the M1.
So are you saying that thin and light laptops shouldn't exist and that all chassis should be desktop or larger form factor and come with exotic or liquid cooling systems to squeeze every last drop of performance from the chip without it ever getting hot enough to throttle?
Also starts at $2,500 for 16/512 on Lenovo's website 🥴2.7 pounds isn't light. Thinkpad X1 Nano Gen 2 is 2.14 pounds and includes a fan.