Many publications do, which I've always found weird. John Gruber was complaining about it recently na kind of overstated the issue, but I think it's generally a valid point: laptop reviewers seem very reticent to include Macs in their comparisons with PCs, presumably because it would make them look bad on many axes. Windows PCs will always have more compatibility, legacy software, and gaming performance or flexibility, but especially with Apple silicon Macs are faster, quieter, and much more efficient.
There are ways that Macs are apples and oranges to PCs, but I think to general users in the world where a lot more software is cross-platform or web-based, it makes sense to include them. I and many Mac users probably wouldn't consider a PC because that's not what we're interested in, but that's atypical, the same way there are plenty of people who switch between Android and iOS.
Were it so easy.
Making sober, reasoned videos just isn't a recipe for Youtube success. A few channels can do it, but it sort of is the exception that proves the rule. Hyperbolic takes and bug-eyed thumbnails are more likely to do better, and magnifying any potential controversy into a "___-gate" for clicks is a way of generating content where there was no content before.
