Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So this a19 pro can reach 11k consuming 12W?
IMG_2553.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrWojtek
Perhaps only tangentially related to this thread, but I just spotted this Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Geekbench result (via @never_released on mastodon)

3831 ST, 11525 MT

The next generation Oryon cores are going toe-to-toe with the latest Apple cores here. They’re trading wins in the sub tests. Even the sub tests where Apple’s SME implementation allowed a healthy lead before, the SME implementation in Oryon is performing similar.

This is wild!

Obviously, it’s a leaked result, we don’t know the test conditions etc. so pinch of salt and all that, but it’s a strong early showing for 8 Elite Gen 5 and the new Oryon cores. The next “X Elite” for PC might be a more robust alternative to Apple Silicon than the first attempt (at least on CPU performance - Qualcomm has a lot of work to do in other areas).

I think we might close out 2025 with next-gen Oryon and Arm’s Lumex C1-Ultra closing the gap on Apple’s performance cores 🤯

(P.S. to be clear - not picking sides or wishing Apple to fail here, I love all hardware and seeing the competition turn up the heat on Apple is exciting. Apple Silicon is amazing)

Do keep in mind that the Oryon runs at ~ 8% higher clock to achieve this result. Knowing the power consumption of these cores will be key.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tenthousandthings
I just learned that the A19 on the iPhone 17 has only 5 GPU cores. I was convinced that it had a 6 core GPU.

Also the A19 has smaller caches than the A19 Pro.

All of this is kinda discouraging me from getting an iPhone 17, but I don’t want or need the 17 Pro…

Hopefully the base M5 will be based on the A19 Pro.
 
I just learned that the A19 on the iPhone 17 has only 5 GPU cores. I was convinced that it had a 6 core GPU.

Also the A19 has smaller caches than the A19 Pro.

All of this is kinda discouraging me from getting an iPhone 17, but I don’t want or need the 17 Pro…

Hopefully the base M5 will be based on the A19 Pro.
A19 Pro in the iPhone Air also has only 5 GPU cores. Furthermore, when I checked several days ago, it seemed to perform no better or maybe even slightly worse on average in Geekbench 6.5 CPU than the A19 non-Pro in the iPhone 17, perhaps because of throttling. Also, see @aaronage's post above.
 
I just learned that the A19 on the iPhone 17 has only 5 GPU cores. I was convinced that it had a 6 core GPU.

Also the A19 has smaller caches than the A19 Pro.

All of this is kinda discouraging me from getting an iPhone 17, but I don’t want or need the 17 Pro…

Hopefully the base M5 will be based on the A19 Pro.

It appears that each SKU is configured separately, to meet the target goals in performance, power efficiency, and costs. I am sure similar will apply to M5 family.

As to the cache size difference - why does one need that much cache in a phone? Do you plan to run complex productivity apps or something?
 
Do you plan to run complex productivity apps or something?
Actually, no. But I purchase an iPhone every several years and I thought more cache would translate into better memory management, improved AI performance (for local models coming in the future) and overall better performance in the long term.


A19 Pro in the iPhone Air also has only 5 GPU cores. Furthermore, when I checked several days ago, it seemed to perform no better or maybe even slightly worse on average in Geekbench 6.5 CPU than the A19 non-Pro in the iPhone 17, perhaps because of throttling. Also, see @aaronage's post above.
Yeah, maybe a 6 core GPU on the iPhone 17 could make it throttle and cause excessive heat and/or power draw. As long as the UI doesn’t become sluggish over time I’m okay with that.
 
Actually, no. But I purchase an iPhone every several years and I thought more cache would translate into better memory management, improved AI performance (for local models coming in the future) and overall better performance in the long term.

I’d be very surprised if the software got as complex in the next few years for the cache sizes to make a difference. To put things in perspective - L2 of 8MB per large core in the A19 Pro is 8x larger than that of server and workstation CPUs. You’ll be fine :)

The biggest effect is probably battery life - larger caches mean fewer request to DRAM, which in turn means less energy spent.
 
Yeah, maybe a 6 core GPU on the iPhone 17 could make it throttle and cause excessive heat and/or power draw. As long as the UI doesn’t become sluggish over time I’m okay with that.
You're worrying waaaayyyyy too much if this is just about UI sluggishness. Even my A14 iPhone 12 Pro Max doesn't get very sluggish, and that has just over half the CPU performance (both ST and MT) of A19 non-Pro. The main concern would be RAM, as A19 Pro is paired with 12 GB RAM whereas A19 is 8 GB, but even then it's not going to be a significant issue in the near term, since iPhone 16 Pro Max has "only" 8 GB RAM. My 12 Pro Max has 6 GB RAM, and I'd be perfectly happy using it as my main driver for a couple more years from the OS peppiness standpoint. My main reason for upgrading is to get the vastly upgraded telephoto camera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basic75 and Populus
Got my iPhone Air

Geekbench 6 results:
3577 / 9166 🥵 (warm, adaptive power mode enabled, some background activity) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13926502
3767 / 9588 😎 (cool, adaptive power mode disabled, no background activity) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13937751
3934 / 10479 🥶 (on an ice pack, adaptive power mode disabled, no background activity) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13938931
Impressive. I’m sensing a business here… I’m sure there’s market for a MagSafe IcePack. You put it into the freezer, and whenever you need that extra performance, you attach it like you do with the MagSafe Battery.
 
Last edited:
Impressive. I’m sensing a business here… I’m sure there’s market for a MagSafe IcePack. You put it into the freezer, and whenever you need that extra performance, you attach it like you do with the MagSafe Battery.
Or just a magnetic piece of cold, that uses power to stay cold, so you have to put a magsafe battery on the ColdMag too.
 
Which reminds me:

Whatever happened to ball-gate piezoelectric thermal heat-exchange tech?

Was that a Delorean Moment, or has it just become the ball-holder under the pile?

In my mind, exothermic transference == metropolitan traffic: no matter how many roads and connectors are built, congestive buildup will always happen....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungaree.Chubbins
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.