12w is motherboard power.So this a19 pro can reach 11k consuming 12W?
View attachment 2551277
I can see the M5 hitting around 4000. Interesting times ahead!Gpu improvementsView attachment 2551299
Indeed!I can see the M5 hitting around 4000. Interesting times ahead!
Perhaps only tangentially related to this thread, but I just spotted this Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Geekbench result (via @never_released on mastodon)
3831 ST, 11525 MT
Xiaomi 25113PN0EC - Geekbench
Benchmark results for a Xiaomi 25113PN0EC with a Qualcomm ARMv8 processor.browser.geekbench.com
The next generation Oryon cores are going toe-to-toe with the latest Apple cores here. They’re trading wins in the sub tests. Even the sub tests where Apple’s SME implementation allowed a healthy lead before, the SME implementation in Oryon is performing similar.
This is wild!
Obviously, it’s a leaked result, we don’t know the test conditions etc. so pinch of salt and all that, but it’s a strong early showing for 8 Elite Gen 5 and the new Oryon cores. The next “X Elite” for PC might be a more robust alternative to Apple Silicon than the first attempt (at least on CPU performance - Qualcomm has a lot of work to do in other areas).
I think we might close out 2025 with next-gen Oryon and Arm’s Lumex C1-Ultra closing the gap on Apple’s performance cores 🤯
(P.S. to be clear - not picking sides or wishing Apple to fail here, I love all hardware and seeing the competition turn up the heat on Apple is exciting. Apple Silicon is amazing)
A19 Pro in the iPhone Air also has only 5 GPU cores. Furthermore, when I checked several days ago, it seemed to perform no better or maybe even slightly worse on average in Geekbench 6.5 CPU than the A19 non-Pro in the iPhone 17, perhaps because of throttling. Also, see @aaronage's post above.I just learned that the A19 on the iPhone 17 has only 5 GPU cores. I was convinced that it had a 6 core GPU.
Also the A19 has smaller caches than the A19 Pro.
All of this is kinda discouraging me from getting an iPhone 17, but I don’t want or need the 17 Pro…
Hopefully the base M5 will be based on the A19 Pro.
I just learned that the A19 on the iPhone 17 has only 5 GPU cores. I was convinced that it had a 6 core GPU.
Also the A19 has smaller caches than the A19 Pro.
All of this is kinda discouraging me from getting an iPhone 17, but I don’t want or need the 17 Pro…
Hopefully the base M5 will be based on the A19 Pro.
Actually, no. But I purchase an iPhone every several years and I thought more cache would translate into better memory management, improved AI performance (for local models coming in the future) and overall better performance in the long term.Do you plan to run complex productivity apps or something?
Yeah, maybe a 6 core GPU on the iPhone 17 could make it throttle and cause excessive heat and/or power draw. As long as the UI doesn’t become sluggish over time I’m okay with that.A19 Pro in the iPhone Air also has only 5 GPU cores. Furthermore, when I checked several days ago, it seemed to perform no better or maybe even slightly worse on average in Geekbench 6.5 CPU than the A19 non-Pro in the iPhone 17, perhaps because of throttling. Also, see @aaronage's post above.
Actually, no. But I purchase an iPhone every several years and I thought more cache would translate into better memory management, improved AI performance (for local models coming in the future) and overall better performance in the long term.
You're worrying waaaayyyyy too much if this is just about UI sluggishness. Even my A14 iPhone 12 Pro Max doesn't get very sluggish, and that has just over half the CPU performance (both ST and MT) of A19 non-Pro. The main concern would be RAM, as A19 Pro is paired with 12 GB RAM whereas A19 is 8 GB, but even then it's not going to be a significant issue in the near term, since iPhone 16 Pro Max has "only" 8 GB RAM. My 12 Pro Max has 6 GB RAM, and I'd be perfectly happy using it as my main driver for a couple more years from the OS peppiness standpoint. My main reason for upgrading is to get the vastly upgraded telephoto camera.Yeah, maybe a 6 core GPU on the iPhone 17 could make it throttle and cause excessive heat and/or power draw. As long as the UI doesn’t become sluggish over time I’m okay with that.
Impressive. I’m sensing a business here… I’m sure there’s market for a MagSafe IcePack. You put it into the freezer, and whenever you need that extra performance, you attach it like you do with the MagSafe Battery.Got my iPhone Air
Geekbench 6 results:
3577 / 9166 🥵 (warm, adaptive power mode enabled, some background activity) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13926502
3767 / 9588 😎 (cool, adaptive power mode disabled, no background activity) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13937751
3934 / 10479 🥶 (on an ice pack, adaptive power mode disabled, no background activity) https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13938931
Or just a magnetic piece of cold, that uses power to stay cold, so you have to put a magsafe battery on the ColdMag too.Impressive. I’m sensing a business here… I’m sure there’s market for a MagSafe IcePack. You put it into the freezer, and whenever you need that extra performance, you attach it like you do with the MagSafe Battery.
Very interesting! I was joking but obviously someone thought about it before.You can already purchase peltiers (thermoelectric heat pumps) with magnets that can attach on phones and tablets.
Some also come with MagSafe charging, like the AUKEY MagFusion GameFrost.