Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

innerproduct

macrumors regular
Jun 21, 2021
222
353
What's there to say? It's just 2x M2 Max, which have been out for a while.
I guess you are spot on there. It is just a little bit faster. Probably not solved the m1 ultra scaling issues either. Probably quite embarrassing for all to not be able to deliver a 4xM2 or having some extra power available. the MacPro 2013 was at least 2-3 x faster in GPU compared to an iMac. And the 2019 MacPro could have quite extreme performance if you payed up. Now we have the iMac replacement only in a small or large box. Laughable
 

mode11

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2015
1,452
1,172
London
I guess you are spot on there. It is just a little bit faster. Probably not solved the m1 ultra scaling issues either. Probably quite embarrassing for all to not be able to deliver a 4xM2 or having some extra power available. the MacPro 2013 was at least 2-3 x faster in GPU compared to an iMac. And the 2019 MacPro could have quite extreme performance if you payed up. Now we have the iMac replacement only in a small or large box. Laughable
To be fair, it's more like an iMac Pro replacement.
 

goMac

macrumors 604
Apr 15, 2004
7,663
1,694
how the **** can they put this much focus on ********. the ultra chip was not even presented in more than 30 secs

It's what I said when everyone was like "OMG they can't announce the Mac Pro because there won't be the time with the headset!"

They only need 5 minutes. It's not a rocket science product.

(And so far we haven't even gotten to the headset yet.)
 

mode11

macrumors 65816
Jul 14, 2015
1,452
1,172
London
So it seems it uses an LCD shutter to block out the environment. But all at once - not per pixel. Will be interesting to see how well it projects graphics over a regularly lit room.

'Pro' likely means this will be expensive.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.