shompa said:
Apple could have released a quad G5 3+ ghz system by now, if they wanted.
They needed liquid-cooling to get to 2.5GHz, what makes you think that they could do 3+Ghz now? And even if they had been able to do it, that would have been the end of the road, basically.
And pumping more life to G5 would not make any sense. Apple needs Intel for their laptops and small form-factor machines. It makes sense to use only one architecture. Either Apple uses PPC, in which case they are stuck at G4 for the portables. Or they use Intel, in which case they use Xeons in the workstations. Using Intel on some machines, and PPC on others is stupid thing to do.
But, then the Xeon system had been slower.
What makes you think that?
The G5s are low powerchips.
Which is why they need liquid cooling? I have seen reviews of G5 PowerMac, which mention that the G5 runs very, very hot.
If Apple had been smart, they should have keept the watercooler and clocked the Xeons to 3.7ghz.
Intel does not support those speeds, so Apple would be running the CPU out of spec. Yeah, I can see that being a smart thing to do
. Luckily you are not the one deciding these things.
Now, they are cheap quad Intel that can not do dual grapics.
None of the Quad-intels can do dual-graphics. There are no Xeon-chipsets that support dual-graphics.