Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

bsbeamer

macrumors 601
Sep 19, 2012
4,313
2,713
^^
Some iMac models are without bootcamp support as well. Stick with 10.13.6 to keep everything running "as-is" or upgrade to stay with current OS, but make tradeoffs.

Will be interesting to see what GPU(s) the MacPro7,1 supports and HOW they are supported. UEFI makes most sense logically, but probably not monetarily...
 

kings79

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2015
227
105
It is a 9 years-old machine. Let that sink and then rethink your comment....

Are you defending them?

I know how old the machine is. I have two of them.

Point is they gave us new firmware but impaired some key functionality when they could have done a little more work and completed the task.

I think saying Apple are scumbags is fair.
[doublepost=1537836257][/doublepost]There is a spreadsheet going round that would be helpful if people could fill out once they have installed Mojave on their machines.
 

bookemdano

macrumors 68000
Jul 29, 2011
1,514
846
It is a 9 years-old machine. Let that sink and then rethink your comment....

The boot picker is core Mac functionality from the very earliest days of OS X. If you use Boot Camp with Mojave, the boot picker is practically essential to return to macOS after being in Windows.

If you don't care about it, fine. But that doesn't mean it's not important to other users. My gripe is that Apple is not making sufficiently clear to cMP owners that they are losing all of this functionality before they upgrade to Mojave.
 

kings79

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2015
227
105
The boot picker is core Mac functionality from the very earliest days of OS X. If you use Boot Camp with Mojave, the boot picker is practically essential to return to macOS after being in Windows.

If you don't care about it, fine. But that doesn't mean it's not important to other users. My gripe is that Apple is not making sufficiently clear to cMP owners that they are losing all of this functionality before they upgrade to Mojave.

Couldn't agree more!
 

AliGT83

macrumors member
Jul 17, 2018
71
43
The boot picker is core Mac functionality from the very earliest days of OS X. If you use Boot Camp with Mojave, the boot picker is practically essential to return to macOS after being in Windows.

If you don't care about it, fine. But that doesn't mean it's not important to other users. My gripe is that Apple is not making sufficiently clear to cMP owners that they are losing all of this functionality before they upgrade to Mojave.

Ok, so let me ask you. Would you be happier (or less angry towards apple) if they have not released Mojave for cMPs at all? I mean nobody is forcing you to update to Mojave. It is completely up to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsbeamer

kings79

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2015
227
105
Ok, so let me ask you. Would you be happier (or less angry towards apple) if they have not released Mojave for cMPs at all? I mean nobody is forcing you to update to Mojave. It is completely up to you.

Your question is MOOT because Apple HAS released Mojave and 138.0.0.0.xxxx firmware for the 5,1. So they ARE "Supporting" the cMP 5,1.

So, the question begs as mentioned before. Why the half assed support?...
 

bookemdano

macrumors 68000
Jul 29, 2011
1,514
846
Ok, so let me ask you. Would you be happier (or less angry towards apple) if they have not released Mojave for cMPs at all? I mean nobody is forcing you to update to Mojave. It is completely up to you.

You name me a core function of macOS that you use every day and then I will ask you the same question. :rolleyes:
 

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,601
I hate being the off-topic guy, but please, Apple decisions about what to support is totally off-topic. Open another thread and move this discussion, this thread is specific to discuss BootROM issues. A lot of good threads here derailed, let's keep on topic.
 

AliGT83

macrumors member
Jul 17, 2018
71
43
You name me a core function of macOS that you use every day and then I will ask you the same question. :rolleyes:
If it is a core function that you use every day, rely on it and it is no longer present in the latest release of macOS... then why update? again it is not an obligation. Hell I still have a couple 2009 cMPs on Snow Leopard because support for some software and interfaces was dropped in later releases...
 

kings79

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2015
227
105
If it is a core function that you use every day, rely on it and it is no longer present in the latest release of macOS... then why update? again it is not an obligation. Hell I still have a couple 2009 cMPs on Snow Leopard because support for some software and interfaces was dropped in later releases...

Mate you are way outnumbered I can safely say. Anyone who call's themselves a "Pro" user; utilizes the Boot Picker. End of story. It's a core function that should be included in Mojave/138.x.x.x.x.x because the cMP 5,1 was given new Firmware....

I hate being the off-topic guy, but please, Apple decisions about what to support is totally off-topic. Open another thread and move this discussion, this thread is specific to discuss BootROM issues. A lot of good threads here derailed, let's keep on topic.

You are right and this is a great thread. Lets keep it that way. :)
 

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,601
I'm kinda surprised tsialex hasn't figured out a way to add UEFI card boot support yet. Smart dude there.
LOL, I’m just a dumb guy who insists. I’m not looking at UEFI.

Maybe we can get DP1.2 working with AMD GCN1.x cards to make boot screens work with 4K monitors.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: skeptech

kings79

macrumors regular
Sep 16, 2015
227
105
LOL, I’m just a dumb guy who insists. I’m not looking at UEFI. But maybe we can get DP1.2 working with AMD GCN1.x cards…

Dude, your the most valuable mac guy IMO right now.

Whatever we as a community can do to help you or dosdude to get this happening please let us know. This is a community effort (If it is possible) and paying soooo much for flashed cards from the US is just too expensive for anyone not living in the US...
 

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,601
paying soooo much for flashed cards from the US is just too expensive for anyone not living in the US...
I look at goals that I can reach with my free time, within my means. UEFI support is totally out of reach even with full community support and lot's of people working - only Apple could implement that.

Do not dream, even if some company get recent AMD cards working with BootScreens, do you think that will be for free?

I think that no company capable of doing this, like Sapphire/eVGA did it before with Apple support, wants to do it now since it's a totally no-ROI situation. People will just pirate it.

Who wants a recent GPU for Mac Pro, already bought it now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: skeptech

SneakyTLoD

macrumors member
Apr 6, 2018
72
30
You are probably right but maybe once apple support the new 7,1 there will be some code that we can hack into the older ROMS. It's unlikely but who knows. It wasn't long ago that there was no way to get nVME and here we are. I BELIEVE!! If not we'll all be fine too.
 

tsialex

Contributor
Original poster
Jun 13, 2016
13,455
13,601
You are probably right but maybe once apple support the new 7,1 there will be some code that we can hack into the older cards. It's unlikely but who knows. It wasn't long ago that there was no way to get nVME and here we are. I BELIEVE!!
It's not the same. I already explained this before.

APFS and NVMe are EFI modules, Apple inserted both in almost every Mac that has 10.13 support. Mac Pro missed NVMe, so people started to investigate. It was a easy one and even without the BootROM support, was working before with other methods.

Mac Pro uses UGA EFI, not GOP. All Macs since 2012/13 uses GOP. Apple will not go back to a 2006/7 tech on 2019 Macs. What you are expecting is just unreal.

No one got GOP boot screens working with 3rd party bootloaders, not even that…
 
Last edited:

LightBulbFun

macrumors 68030
Nov 17, 2013
2,900
3,195
London UK
It's not the same. I already explained this before.

APFS and NVMe are EFI modules, Apple inserted both in almost every Mac that got has 10.13 support. Mac Pro missed NVMe, so people started to investigate. It was a easy one.

Mac Pro uses UGA EFI, not GOP. All Macs since 2013/14 uses GOP. Apple will not go back to a 2008 tech on 2019 Macs. What you are expecting is just unreal.

its also worth mentioning even tho the newer Macs do GOP

assuming you could "magically" bring out a PCIe slot on one of those macs

if you stuck a PC card in there you would get no Boot screens still

apples Pre OS/driver Graphics environment is more then just UGA/GOP and goes all the way back to the very start of PCI Macs and the introduction of OpenFirmware in 1995 with the Power Macintosh 9500.

a good example of this is the work MVC has had to do to get eGPU Boot screens on modern macs despite modern macs being GOP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsialex

SneakyTLoD

macrumors member
Apr 6, 2018
72
30
Well there you go. Good info. The software/firmware side of this was never my strong suit. I can however tell you how to setup an ASML stepper to optimize making the chips. Though I have been away from the semiconductor industry for close to ten years. Was a lot of fun when I did it though. Wish I had learned more from my colleagues while I was there.
 
Last edited:

SneakyTLoD

macrumors member
Apr 6, 2018
72
30
I wish I still had some of those contacts as they could easily send us down the right path. Unfortunately most everyone I worked with has long since retired. Austin used to be the place for all of that. Guess it still is but I've been out of it for far too long.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kings79
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.