Boycotts help in this competitive market environment in USA.
When one store does not offer one thing and the other does, that gives the other store an advantage over the other in this competition. Then, the first store will look why this is and evaluate based on customer complaints. Later, the first store offers the one thing that started the advantage by the second store.
Well competition is good for the consumers because they can choose where to go, but it should be clear to everyone by now that personal boycott (i.e., vote with your wallet) will never, ever, make companies such as Walmart, HEB or Home Depot budge and start allowing contactless payments simply because those boycotting are and will always be a tiny minority, while the overwhelming rest couldn’t care less about the lack of contactless.
In other words, contactless is never enough of an advantage for one competitor over another (Walmart still has more customers than its competitors that accept contactless despite walmart not accepting it, for example). At least not in countries that arrived the latest to the party of contactless payments such as the US or Mexico.
Last edited: