Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We now have photos of all these tech journalists wearing Vision Pro yet we still don’t have one photograph of Tim Cook or any other Apple exec wearing one. Presumably they’ve been using the device for quite some time now. By the way, Wired reporter Lauren Goode said all the shots of tech reporters wearing Vision Pro were taken by Apple. And they all noticeably hide the battery. Nilay Patel’s shot was cropped so you see the wire but not the battery. A condition of getting the review unit, they weren’t allowed to share any photographs of the hardware outside of the shot taken by Apple.

View attachment 2338512
So what?
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
People keep saying this but it is totally out of character for apple. When apple makes a product that isn't great...they just dont ever release it and lose the money. Apple thinks this device is complete and a quality mixed reality spatial computer. Thats how apple does things. Are there things left out that will get better...of course. But it's not apples pattern to release immature products. They never have and that would be a major departure. And...the fact that products get better over time isn't proof a product was immature...just things in tech get better.
True, it has not been Apple's pattern post Steve Jobs return in the late 1990's to release products that are not ready per say, but this is no longer Steve's company - it is Tim's. Anyway the way I look at the Vision Pro is that it looks like a bulky, heavy, cumbersome and impractical product that you wear with a questionable use case, but is very cool technology that is a peek into the future of computing. I think what most people would be lining up for are Tony Stark style glasses that can be worn at all times and overlay AR info. I would imagine as time goes on, the evolution will be comparable to the early versions of laptop design compared to what they looked like just a decade or so later.

In 1989 we had this...
portable1.jpeg


Then about 12 years later we had this...

2013-06-02-tibook.png
 
Last edited:
I think this annoys people even more than if they just said there is only one model and it is "maxed out" i.e. there are no extra options and it is $4,999 all in, including Apple Care.
 


A top-specification Vision Pro headset with all optional extras costs $4,795.95, which is $1,296.95 more than the device's $3,499 starting price.

vision-pro-headset.jpg

The Apple Vision Pro comes with a Solo Knit Band, a Dual Loop Band, a Light Seal, two Light Seal Cushions, a cover for the front of the device, a polishing cloth, a battery, a USB-C charging cable, and a USB-C power adapter. However, there are still several additional options for customers to add to their order, such as ZEISS lens inserts, which start at $99. When all of the extras not included as standard are added, the pricing breakdown is as follows:

  • Apple Vision Pro: $3,499
  • 1TB Storage Configuration: +$400
  • ZEISS Optical Inserts — Prescription: +$149
  • AppleCare+: +$499
  • Belkin Battery Holder for Apple Vision Pro: +$49.95
  • Apple Vision Pro Travel Case: +$199

Users can also purchase additional headbands, Light Seal Cushions, and batteries for their device from the Apple Store. The Vision Pro launches in the U.S. on Friday, February 2.

Article Link: Maxed-Out Apple Vision Pro Headset Costs Almost $4,800
The steep AppleCare+ price hints at the possibility that these are really delicate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
The steep AppleCare+ price hints at the possibility that these are really delicate.
My gut feel is that it's the components that are expensive to replace - especially the eye display, which is pretty much class-leading for any VR/AR headset currently with the super high resolution.

AppleCare+ prices have trended downward before I believe - I hope this will be the case here over time as the parts become cheaper to manufacture at scale....
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
I'm guessing I'll buy version five or six when the prices are way down. Not that I wouldn't want to have one, I do. But for that kind of money? For something I can break just sitting on it?

Big nope.
 
You think $400 for 1TB is expensive... how about $200 for that storage case 🤣 - that's really pure price gouging, like those Mac Pro wheels....


But that storage case is well made leather case, oops, sorry never mind. Those wheels were well made and engineered, Beautiful works of art. Overkill, definitely. But the wheels and the storage case do not affect the performance of either device. Order the case / wheels, don’t order them, the headset performs the same.

I'd expect it to cost 1/10th the price by then. So base model should be something like $350, adjusted for inflation $500 - affordable by everyone at that point.

And still with only 256 gigs of storage….
 
  • Haha
Reactions: masotime
Not sure how many will go for the 1TB variant. Not everyone will require Zeiss inserts.
 
My problem with this…. It will be obsolete in 1.5 years tops
By that logic, the iPhone is obsolete after 1 year, when the next model launches. It has an M2 chip and will likely continue to receive software updates and work the same way it did for the next 5 years at least.
 
By that logic, the iPhone is obsolete after 1 year, when the next model launches. It has an M2 chip and will likely continue to receive software updates and work the same way it did for the next 5 years at least.
Though those days are over for me at least… upgrading an iPhone every years is a much smaller pill to swallow compared to a $4800 headset
 
Adding a bunch of accessories to get a ludicrously high price and calling that “maxing out” is kinda wild ngl
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThomasJL
You’ve never included accessories or AppleCare pricing in your “maxed out” figures before. Odd that you’re doing it now.

Maybe slightly more odd that people didn't do it before. The world needs more "Total Cost of Ownership" thinking.

Honestly the only thing that strikes me as especially egregious is $50 for a battery belt clip.
 
Maybe slightly more odd that people didn't do it before. The world needs more "Total Cost of Ownership" thinking.

Honestly the only thing that strikes me as especially egregious is $50 for a battery belt clip.
Apple's accessories have never been cheap. Give it some time and I am sure we will find cheaper alternatives online.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.