So what?We now have photos of all these tech journalists wearing Vision Pro yet we still don’t have one photograph of Tim Cook or any other Apple exec wearing one. Presumably they’ve been using the device for quite some time now. By the way, Wired reporter Lauren Goode said all the shots of tech reporters wearing Vision Pro were taken by Apple. And they all noticeably hide the battery. Nilay Patel’s shot was cropped so you see the wire but not the battery. A condition of getting the review unit, they weren’t allowed to share any photographs of the hardware outside of the shot taken by Apple.
View attachment 2338512
True, it has not been Apple's pattern post Steve Jobs return in the late 1990's to release products that are not ready per say, but this is no longer Steve's company - it is Tim's. Anyway the way I look at the Vision Pro is that it looks like a bulky, heavy, cumbersome and impractical product that you wear with a questionable use case, but is very cool technology that is a peek into the future of computing. I think what most people would be lining up for are Tony Stark style glasses that can be worn at all times and overlay AR info. I would imagine as time goes on, the evolution will be comparable to the early versions of laptop design compared to what they looked like just a decade or so later.People keep saying this but it is totally out of character for apple. When apple makes a product that isn't great...they just dont ever release it and lose the money. Apple thinks this device is complete and a quality mixed reality spatial computer. Thats how apple does things. Are there things left out that will get better...of course. But it's not apples pattern to release immature products. They never have and that would be a major departure. And...the fact that products get better over time isn't proof a product was immature...just things in tech get better.
$4800 for a scuba mask? Um, no!got to pay to play. hasn't that always been the way?
I'd expect it to cost 1/10th the price by then. So base model should be something like $350, adjusted for inflation $500 - affordable by everyone at that point.I can't wait to see what this will be in 10 years. Exciting times.
thats cheap compared to this beauty..$4800 for a scuba mask? Um, no!
It’s a photo of a woman’s face. If that seems sexual to you, that’s on you, not the photo.I wish they would stop with the creep ad photo. At least they closed her mouth in this one.
The steep AppleCare+ price hints at the possibility that these are really delicate.
A top-specification Vision Pro headset with all optional extras costs $4,795.95, which is $1,296.95 more than the device's $3,499 starting price.
![]()
The Apple Vision Pro comes with a Solo Knit Band, a Dual Loop Band, a Light Seal, two Light Seal Cushions, a cover for the front of the device, a polishing cloth, a battery, a USB-C charging cable, and a USB-C power adapter. However, there are still several additional options for customers to add to their order, such as ZEISS lens inserts, which start at $99. When all of the extras not included as standard are added, the pricing breakdown is as follows:
- Apple Vision Pro: $3,499
- 1TB Storage Configuration: +$400
- ZEISS Optical Inserts — Prescription: +$149
- AppleCare+: +$499
- Belkin Battery Holder for Apple Vision Pro: +$49.95
- Apple Vision Pro Travel Case: +$199
Users can also purchase additional headbands, Light Seal Cushions, and batteries for their device from the Apple Store. The Vision Pro launches in the U.S. on Friday, February 2.
Article Link: Maxed-Out Apple Vision Pro Headset Costs Almost $4,800
My gut feel is that it's the components that are expensive to replace - especially the eye display, which is pretty much class-leading for any VR/AR headset currently with the super high resolution.The steep AppleCare+ price hints at the possibility that these are really delicate.
You think $400 for 1TB is expensive... how about $200 for that storage case 🤣 - that's really pure price gouging, like those Mac Pro wheels....
I'd expect it to cost 1/10th the price by then. So base model should be something like $350, adjusted for inflation $500 - affordable by everyone at that point.
Or that Apple will simply replace it like they do with the Apple Watch or ipad, rather than attempt any sensitive repairs on it.The steep AppleCare+ price hints at the possibility that these are really delicate.
Where is it strapped down? The battery is strapped down, but I see no additional straps.It’s strapped down, I’m sure it’s gonna be fine. If not, I’ll just return it.
By that logic, the iPhone is obsolete after 1 year, when the next model launches. It has an M2 chip and will likely continue to receive software updates and work the same way it did for the next 5 years at least.My problem with this…. It will be obsolete in 1.5 years tops
Though those days are over for me at least… upgrading an iPhone every years is a much smaller pill to swallow compared to a $4800 headsetBy that logic, the iPhone is obsolete after 1 year, when the next model launches. It has an M2 chip and will likely continue to receive software updates and work the same way it did for the next 5 years at least.
You’ve never included accessories or AppleCare pricing in your “maxed out” figures before. Odd that you’re doing it now.
Apple's accessories have never been cheap. Give it some time and I am sure we will find cheaper alternatives online.Maybe slightly more odd that people didn't do it before. The world needs more "Total Cost of Ownership" thinking.
Honestly the only thing that strikes me as especially egregious is $50 for a battery belt clip.