Good. Hopefully the battery will improve as well.
So ready to not buy hot-ass Intel laptops for PC users at my work.
So ready to not buy hot-ass Intel laptops for PC users at my work.
The difference with Apple is that software developers are actually releasing Apple silicon versions of their apps. On Windows nobody is releasing Arm versions of their apps. Microsoft’s emulation isn’t quite to the level of Rosetta2 that Apple provides either. The net result is a mixed bag for Windows on Arm with few advantages to using it.
I do too, because with Windows you need it!Awesome. Competition is good. And I hope all these Windows laptops come with at least 512gb SSD and 16gb of RAM
Nope, the business-line Surface Pros remain x86 for a reason. Only the consumer models get ARM. Microsoft would like Windows users to transition to ARM, but that’ll be a long way. The vast majority of Windows software is still built for x86 exclusively, requiring emulation on ARM, and there is little incentive in changing that.It seems "the writing is on the wall" for Intel as more and more MFG's move to ARM based systems
Good for them
"Snapdragon X Elite will likely run hotter and require laptops with fans."
meh....
🤣🤣🤣
By the time it comes out, it’ll already likely going to be outpaced by the M4 chip.
Faster at what, exactly?
Dream on.
Why is this gatekeeping and condescending tone on MacRumors so openly celebrated? All it does it perpetuate Apple's monopoly on things, jack up prices and rip off Apple consumers. Why are any of you even mocking Microsoft? They're in the computer space and this is exactly where they should be improving. I didn't hear any of this kind of scoffing when Apple felt entitled to making a DAMN CAR?Welcome to the party - I just hope there’s some beer left 😂😂😂
Totally agree but I think that Microsoft continuing down this path and holding special events for things like this paint a potentially future that is not good for Intel. Maybe I shouldn't have said "writing on the wall" and maybe "faint outline" insteadNope, the business-line Surface Pros remain x86 for a reason. Only the consumer models get ARM. Microsoft would like Windows users to transition to ARM, but that‘ll be a long way. The vast majority of Windows software is still built for x86 exclusively, and there is little incentive to change that so far.
Macrumors hosts mostly a certain type of person... not your average Apple customer. The people posting on here are a tiny percentage of the Apple users. And most average apple customers probably use a combination of Apple and PC... and dont care either way for each.Why is this gatekeeping and condescending tone on MacRumors so openly celebrated? All it does it perpetuate Apple's monopoly on things, jack up prices and rip off Apple consumers. Why are any of you even mocking Microsoft? They're in the computer space and this is exactly where they should be improving. I didn't hear any of this kind of scoffing when Apple felt entitled to making a DAMN CAR?
Competition is what makes your products BETTER. If it weren't for that, you'd all still be stuck with Intel toasters in your laptops.
Why is this gatekeeping and condescending tone on MacRumors so openly celebrated? All it does it perpetuate Apple's monopoly on things, jack up prices and rip off Apple consumers. Why are any of you even mocking Microsoft? They're in the computer space and this is exactly where they should be improving. I didn't hear any of this kind of scoffing when Apple felt entitled to making a DAMN CAR?
Competition is what makes your products BETTER. If it weren't for that, you'd all still be stuck with Intel toasters in your laptops.
Single core performance is much better indicator of user experience for the average consumer workload than multicore performance.I mean that's awesome, competition is good and I hope we'll see lots of new windows laptops with ARM processors but... they're comparing 12 performance core SOC to 4 performance + 4 efficiency core SOC.
It'd be embarrassing for them if a SOC that has 8 performance cores would be slower than M3.
You want Microsoft to do a fair comparison?Huh?
Snapdragon X Elite consume way more power, has more cores, and not even 3nm. Such a terrible comparison and it should be compared to M2,3 Pro chips instead.
LOL, unless it can run Mac OS, I don't care if it's 100x faster than Apple's chips. I ditched Windows in 1994. Haven't seen anything yet to entice me to go back.
Microsoft will advertise that its upcoming Windows laptops with Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite processor are faster than the MacBook Air with Apple's latest M3 chip, according to internal documents obtained by The Verge.
![]()
"Microsoft is so confident in these new Qualcomm chips that it's planning a number of demos that will show how these processors will be faster than an M3 MacBook Air for CPU tasks, AI acceleration, and even app emulation," the report says. Microsoft believes its laptops will offer "faster app emulation" than Apple's Rosetta 2.
Introduced in October, the Snapdragon X Elite has Arm-based architecture like Apple silicon. Qualcomm last year claimed that the processor achieved 21% faster multi-core CPU performance than the M3 chip, based on the Geekbench 6 benchmark tool.
There are a few caveats here, including that Microsoft and Qualcomm are comparing to Apple's lower-end M3 chip instead of its higher-end M3 Pro and M3 Max chips. MacBooks with Apple silicon also offer industry-leading performance-per-watt, while the Snapdragon X Elite will likely run hotter and require laptops with fans. Since being updated with the M1 chip in 2020, the MacBook Air has featured a fanless design. Apple can also optimize the performance of MacBooks since it controls both the hardware and macOS software.
Nevertheless, it is clear that Apple's competitors are making progress with Arm-based laptops. Microsoft plans to announce laptops powered by the Snapdragon X Elite later this year, including the Surface Pro 10 and Surface Laptop 6 on May 20.
Article Link: Microsoft Says Windows Laptops With Snapdragon X Elite Will Be Faster Than M3 MacBook Air
There are a lot of non-tech consumers who don’t really care about the OS, they just want a computer that does the job.If a buyer wants a Windows based machine, they will never buy a Mac. Likewise, a Mac user will not be interested in this Snapdragon Windows device. So it's good publicity for Microsoft comparing to Apple Silicon, but it will matter very little in actual consumer decisions.