Which is a good thing because 72 percent of the world uses that.Yeah I will gain a 20% performance advantage but I will also inherit Windows.
Which is a good thing because 72 percent of the world uses that.Yeah I will gain a 20% performance advantage but I will also inherit Windows.
Exactly and that's why laptops should be compared running on their batteries, not just plugged in and sometimes the power-brick adds many pounds to the total carry weight.The benefits of Apple Silicon are performance combined with energy efficiency. It's not impressive to just beat Apple in the performance metric, you have to also do it in the performance efficiency metric. Otherwise, who cares?
Absolutely true but the dynamics are different. As Apple is a hardware company and controls their hardware they were able to ditch Intel completely, really providing little choice to devs other than to keep using Rosetta. Microsoft, on the other hand, is a software company at heart so what needs to happen is OEMs need to start using ARM chips, then we will see devs switching over. Still, you have a great point and certainly this is a sticking point for Microsoft. Although I'd say that even today you can get an Arm procced Surface device and many, if not most, programs don't necessarily run terribly, from what I understand Microsoft's translation layer is actually pretty good. And at least many of the core programs are in Arm, MS Office (sort of, see ARM64EC), Web browsers, Adobe photoshop/lightroom and are otherwise slowly implementing ARM, and rumors of Windows 12 going fully ARM.
Apple... their performance gains have been lacklustre when moving from M1 -> M2 -> M3.
Exactly. The 72 percent who use Windows may also have no interest in turning to MacOS irrespective of how good the M4 or M14 will be.Doesn't matter to me if it's 300% faster, I have no interest in returning to Windows.
Uh, a laptop is a computer, just in a different form. Desktop tower, AIO, laptop, tablet, smartphone—they’re all computers distinguished by their forms to suit different uses albeit with a fair bit of overlap.Laptops and computers are two different animals.
Of course they don’t want to talk about battery life or performance per watt. It’s a typical PC mentality, like increased power comes with no negatives (like heat, battery life, noise (due to needing added cooling), size (again due to needing added cooling) and of course electricity costs money - unless you’re running on your own solar power.If they want to compete with Macbook Air, power efficiency has to be the goal.
No point in being marginally faster with half the battery life.
Sure...of course I understand that. But I was responding to a comment that was trying to blur the lines. But power conservation in a laptop is extremely important. So just focusing on performance and comparing two laptops is disingenuous.Uh, a laptop is a computer, just in a different form. Desktop tower, AIO, laptop, tablet, smartphone—they’re all computers distinguished by their forms to suit different uses albeit with a fair bit of overlap.
Re: Snapdragon—your bacon will be ready to eat under ten minutes.
Not swapping. Buying for Windows on Arm.Same song and dance I hear from HP, Dell, Lenovo and Microsoft.
Never swapping my MacBook Air M3 for those.
It is pretty funny (and predictable) to see all these people come to Apple's defense. Meanwhile, they'll easily choose a Qualcomm modem over an Intel modem. Same goes with Qualcomm's 5G modem vs an Apple 5G modem... if Apple can even figure out how to get it to work. 🤣Why is this gatekeeping and condescending tone on MacRumors so openly celebrated? All it does it perpetuate Apple's monopoly on things, jack up prices and rip off Apple consumers. Why are any of you even mocking Microsoft? They're in the computer space and this is exactly where they should be improving. I didn't hear any of this kind of scoffing when Apple felt entitled to making a DAMN CAR?
Competition is what makes your products BETTER. If it weren't for that, you'd all still be stuck with Intel toasters in your laptops.
good for you. so why are you on here? what Apple products are you using?Surface laptops have Apple levels of build quality, no bloatware or garbage that many other manufacturers add... and if they can get the battery performance up there with the MacBook Air... I think its a solid option.
Most people are familiar with Windows... and it's more versatile from a software compatibility aspect.
If I had to pick up just one of my devices and told I could only use that device... it would probably be my surface laptop go 2... it can do everything... its a jack of all trades.
good for you. so why are you on here? what Apple products are you using?