Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Good for Microsoft, I guess? It's still just a bunch of third party hardware makers with Windows slapped on it. We all know how a majority, if not most PC manufacturers, produce mass-market junk akin to Android in the mobile space. I suspect these PCs will be a very small selection of "high end" machines, but we need to look at price and also battery life.

Also, it's Windows. Who cares? I was an avid user of Windows since Windows XP and up until Windows 7 in the late 2000s, then I made the switch to Mac and it is very hard to compare/compete with the total Apple user experience.

I see Windows PCs as office or library machines, just the dime-a-dozen box to get boring stuff done for the day-to-day grind, and I don't think many people get excited about Windows anymore like they used to. Realistically, if this new chip from Qualcomm is fantastic, would it really matter?

I'm aware that over 70% of the world market uses Windows PCs, but Toyota Corolla is the #1 selling automobile on earth and nobody really cares about that either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
The good news here is that windows ARM will continue to be a thing, so we can virtualize it on our Mac's.

Otherwise, meh. Apple hardware still has better raw performance, and of course, excessive RAM and SSD upgrade prices ;-)
 
The benefits of Apple Silicon are performance combined with energy efficiency. It's not impressive to just beat Apple in the performance metric, you have to also do it in the performance efficiency metric. Otherwise, who cares?
Exactly and that's why laptops should be compared running on their batteries, not just plugged in and sometimes the power-brick adds many pounds to the total carry weight.
 
Absolutely true but the dynamics are different. As Apple is a hardware company and controls their hardware they were able to ditch Intel completely, really providing little choice to devs other than to keep using Rosetta. Microsoft, on the other hand, is a software company at heart so what needs to happen is OEMs need to start using ARM chips, then we will see devs switching over. Still, you have a great point and certainly this is a sticking point for Microsoft. Although I'd say that even today you can get an Arm procced Surface device and many, if not most, programs don't necessarily run terribly, from what I understand Microsoft's translation layer is actually pretty good. And at least many of the core programs are in Arm, MS Office (sort of, see ARM64EC), Web browsers, Adobe photoshop/lightroom and are otherwise slowly implementing ARM, and rumors of Windows 12 going fully ARM.

Microsoft's most significant issue with software is legacy. To cater to the professional and server markets, Microsoft has always provided much longer support time for all its software than Apple. Apple does support its hardware for a decent amount of time, but it drops support for older versions of the software much faster than Microsoft. This allows developers to be lazy and never adopt new APIs, coding languages, etc. When installing the monitor drivers for my Samsung Odyssey G9 OLED (G95SC), a monitor released in 2023, it required me to have .NET Framework 3.X enabled and installed on my Windows 11 23H2 desktop because the installer was coded using .NET Framework 3.X. Something that was introduced in 2006 and was considered End-of-Life in 2011.

A lot of companies and developers won't care at all. It doesn't matter if your new APIs, coding languages, or whatever are much better than what they are replacing in every perceivable way. When you allow something to work still, dragging all this legacy software along just to appease the professional market in an attempt to stay relevant, you are allowing the lazy ones never to adopt whatever new stuff you are desperately trying to push.

Apple was very upfront and aggressive with the transition to Apple Silicone and told developers to get their applications ARM-native or bust as they pull the rug under their feet if they don't. You never see Microsoft do anything like this, as Apple and Microsoft have very different approaches to dealing with and supporting their software.
 
Apple... their performance gains have been lacklustre when moving from M1 -> M2 -> M3.

Are you suggesting that Apple could have made more gains... but they decided not to on purpose?

We'll have to see how Qualcomm handles future generations of their chips.

It could be that X -> X2 -> X3 performance gains will be lackluster as well.

:p
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Doesn't matter to me if it's 300% faster, I have no interest in returning to Windows.
Exactly. The 72 percent who use Windows may also have no interest in turning to MacOS irrespective of how good the M4 or M14 will be. :)
They are used to a certain OS and may have built an eco-system around it. Just because a laptop gives 5 extra hours of battery life will not be enough for a lot of them to switch their OS.
 
When is Microsoft NOT confident that Windows-anything will be superior?

This effort will fail just as every attempt to offer a slimmed down version of Windows to compete with Chromebooks failed.

All of these branches off the main desktop Windows tree are little more than Powerpoint-ware.... conference room presentation that sell a vision to executives and Microsoft-supportive tech bloggers.

Why do all of these efforts fail? Because it is a herculean effort to produce such beasts. You can't just recompile the source for a different architecture and call it "done".

I don't say this with any glee. I was one of the few that was a fan of the Surface RT. I bought one on day-1. It offered so much promise, but Microsoft didn't have the conviction of commitment to see things through to the end. (but at least Panos Panay got his time in the spotlight so good for him, I guess)

The same lack of commitment caused the Zune's demise. (I was a fan of that too back in the day... still am... still rocking my brown 30GB)
 
Laptops and computers are two different animals.
Uh, a laptop is a computer, just in a different form. Desktop tower, AIO, laptop, tablet, smartphone—they’re all computers distinguished by their forms to suit different uses albeit with a fair bit of overlap.


Re: Snapdragon—your bacon will be ready to eat under ten minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
If they want to compete with Macbook Air, power efficiency has to be the goal.

No point in being marginally faster with half the battery life.
Of course they don’t want to talk about battery life or performance per watt. It’s a typical PC mentality, like increased power comes with no negatives (like heat, battery life, noise (due to needing added cooling), size (again due to needing added cooling) and of course electricity costs money - unless you’re running on your own solar power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrkevinfinnerty
Uh, a laptop is a computer, just in a different form. Desktop tower, AIO, laptop, tablet, smartphone—they’re all computers distinguished by their forms to suit different uses albeit with a fair bit of overlap.


Re: Snapdragon—your bacon will be ready to eat under ten minutes.
Sure...of course I understand that. But I was responding to a comment that was trying to blur the lines. But power conservation in a laptop is extremely important. So just focusing on performance and comparing two laptops is disingenuous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Why is this gatekeeping and condescending tone on MacRumors so openly celebrated? All it does it perpetuate Apple's monopoly on things, jack up prices and rip off Apple consumers. Why are any of you even mocking Microsoft? They're in the computer space and this is exactly where they should be improving. I didn't hear any of this kind of scoffing when Apple felt entitled to making a DAMN CAR?

Competition is what makes your products BETTER. If it weren't for that, you'd all still be stuck with Intel toasters in your laptops.
It is pretty funny (and predictable) to see all these people come to Apple's defense. Meanwhile, they'll easily choose a Qualcomm modem over an Intel modem. Same goes with Qualcomm's 5G modem vs an Apple 5G modem... if Apple can even figure out how to get it to work. 🤣



 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
I might use such a laptop one day, but it'll be running Linux or BSD, not trashy windows.
 
Surface laptops have Apple levels of build quality, no bloatware or garbage that many other manufacturers add... and if they can get the battery performance up there with the MacBook Air... I think its a solid option.

Most people are familiar with Windows... and it's more versatile from a software compatibility aspect.

If I had to pick up just one of my devices and told I could only use that device... it would probably be my surface laptop go 2... it can do everything... its a jack of all trades.
good for you. so why are you on here? what Apple products are you using?
 
Lipstick on a pig.
Still Microsoft Windows, which plays the "my way or the highway" game.
Not that others don't but Microsoft is getting very crafty at forcing Edge browser.
They've been doing it since Internet Explorer versus Netscape.
I just read where some apps installed on a Windows 11 machine prevent updates.
What we need is an MBA that doesn't start off at $999.
Could get at least 2 Dell laptops, wipe Windows clean and run Linux.
I just need to improve those skills with Linux.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chevyboy60013
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.