Monitor for Mac Studio

[StudioMacs]

I went from a 27" 5K iMac to a base Mac Studio, and got a Dell U2720Q (27" 4K) to tide me over for a while. I'm running it in "looks like 1440" scaling and it's honestly pretty good. Obviously no performance impact considering how Beef even the base Studio is. Text is a bit fuzzier than it was on the 5K but not egregiously so (and I have better than 20/20 vision so it's not like I couldn't perceive a difference.)

If you're coming from a 5K display I think giving a 4K display a shot is worth it, especially considering you can't go buy a Studio Display today if you wanted to.

I'm fine using this until Apple comes out with the new XDR display, or something in between the current Studio and XDR, with miniLED and ProMotion. I can't bring myself to drop that much money on the same screen I had in my iMac.

It's the same size and resolution as the previous iMac, but it's 20% brighter and has wider viewing angles (if that matters to you).

 

[roland.g]

I have an LG 34” a Ultrawide 21:9 5K2K 5120x2160 with 4K resolution across an Ultrawide screen. I can’t imagine going back to 1080p or 1440p or giving up the width.

 

[enricoclaudio]

Zero regrets going from a pair of LG Ultrafine 32UN880-B 4K to a pair of ASDs VESA Mount. Can’t get used to less than 5K Retina after been spoiled for 7 years by an iMac 5K.

 

[EugW]

I have an LG 34” a Ultrawide 21:9 5K2K 5120x2160 with 4K resolution across an Ultrawide screen. I can’t imagine going back to 1080p or 1440p or giving up the width.

That monitor effectively is a 1080p monitor in terms of OS functionality if you're running 2X scaling. Are you running it non-scaled?

It seems like a nice option but I don't think I could run it non-scaled. I'd prefer something like a 5120x2880 size, like the iMac, but at around 30-32", run at 2X scaling. 2160p vertical resolution is a tad short if you're running it with 2X scaling.

 

[Mac Hammer Fan]

Is this monitor compatible with a Mac Studio through usb-C?

Dell UltraSharp 27 QHD Monitor - U2722D | Dell USA

Elevate your productivity by taking your work to new heights on this 27 inch U2722D large QHD monitor that delivers wide color coverage and fast connectivity.

www.dell.com

 

[roland.g]

That monitor effectively is a 1080p monitor in terms of OS functionality if you're running 2X scaling. Are you running it non-scaled?

It seems like a nice option but I don't think I could run it non-scaled. I'd prefer something like a 5120x2880 size, like the iMac, but at around 30-32", run at 2X scaling. 2160p vertical resolution is a tad short if you're running it with 2X scaling.

ALL 4K monitors are effectively 1080p unless you run them at scaled resolutions. That's what increased PPI is. You effectively get a cleaner smoother resolution over the same surface. If you run it non-scaled you better have the world's best vision because you get enormous real estate with minute graphics. This is just a 4k monitor but instead of 16:9 resulting in 3840x2160, you get the additional width. The size you mentioned 5120x2880 I believe would be a 16:9 that doubles 2560x1440 which really was not a good standard resolution. 1440p was a popular interim UHD from 1080p to 4k, however, it is not one that plays all that well with OS scaling, but it was quite popular for UHD ultrawides.

 

[EugW]

ALL 4K monitors are effectively 1080p unless you run them at scaled resolutions. That's what increased PPI is. You effectively get a cleaner smoother resolution over the same surface. If you run it non-scaled you better have the world's best vision because you get enormous real estate with minute graphics. This is just a 4k monitor but instead of 16:9 resulting in 3840x2160, you get the additional width. The size you mentioned 5120x2880 I believe would be a 16:9 that doubles 2560x1440 which really was not a good standard resolution. 1440p was a popular interim UHD from 1080p to 4k, however, it is not one that plays all that well with OS scaling, but it was quite popular for UHD ultrawides.

That was my point. Effectively 1080p is not my preferred vertical screen resolution, because I find it somewhat short. I might prefer 5120x2400 for example, which would be equivalent to 2560x1200.

Either that or else a super high pixel density (eg. 250+) that would allow me to choose any scaling I want (if macOS supported it well).

 

[roland.g]

That was my point. Effectively 1080p is not my preferred vertical screen resolution, because I find it somewhat short. I might prefer 5120x2400 for example, which would be equivalent to 2560x1200.

Either that or else a super high pixel density (eg. 250+) that would allow me to choose any scaling I want (if macOS supported it well).

My MBP supported full resolution or scaling via full res on my LG, while my 2014 Mini does not. Looking forward to getting my Studio to replace that Mini. My order is expected end of May. 😢😢 Hoping it ships a week or so early.

 

[EugW]

My MBP supported full resolution or scaling via full res on my LG, while my 2014 Mini does not. Looking forward to getting my Studio to replace that Mini. My order is expected end of May. 😢😢 Hoping it ships a week or so early.

Yeah, I'm running a 2014 Mac mini as well. I believe its max resolution is the 2560x1600 I'm running (30" Apple Cinema Display). Actually, I'll probably keep using the 2560x1600 monitor with the new Mac mini for now.

I'm still looking for a 5120x2400ish display at around 30" but AFAIK they don't exist, but the LG 5120x2160 at 34" is definitely an option.

 

[spacedcadet]

Using an older 27" DELL U2713HM Display at 2560 x 1440 here. I don't like the 4k/5k for photography/design as the DPI is too high when editing stuff on a per pixel basis. They LOOK great when viewing stuff of course. Will probably keep it going assuming I can actually attach it to whichever AS Mac I end up getting.

 

[DennCK]

I am considering a Dell P3222QE for Mac Studio. I want to know if it works well in terms of :

1. USB-C display connectivity with Mac Studio
2. HDMI compatibility (in case USB-C doesn't work well)
3. speed of USB downstream ports on the monitor.
4. Text size/sharpness, HiDPI settings (maybe not an issue with SwitchResX)

Thanks all.

 

[rumbobmac]

Using an older 27" DELL U2713HM Display at 2560 x 1440 here. I don't like the 4k/5k for photography/design as the DPI is too high when editing stuff on a per pixel basis. They LOOK great when viewing stuff of course. Will probably keep it going assuming I can actually attach it to whichever AS Mac I end up getting.

Even 32"? I just got my BenQ SW321c and hooked to the MAC studio. Looks great. My main reason to get BenQ was as this setup is only for photography. I also have BenQ 2700PT but haven't hooked it up yet.

 

[spacedcadet]

Even 32"? I just got my BenQ SW321c and hooked to the MAC studio. Looks great. My main reason to get BenQ was as this setup is only for photography. I also have BenQ 2700PT but haven't hooked it up yet.

Am definitely open to newer suggestions for my next monitor, this thread has some great ideas.

 

[Sharky II]

Is the performance of the studio (or any m1 max/ultra) noticeably hindered by running 2x 4k monitors with scaling to 1440p?

I'm currently running 2x 30" ACD and thinking about what happens when one or both inevitably fail.

I mainly do audio, but I also use Capture One and FCPX. I assume the performance hit is unnoticeable on even the base 24-core studio?

My MBP 2012 running open core really doesn't like being in 'high res' mode... but it's not 2012 anymore (unfortunately!)

 

[retlif]

This one is nice. If it had a little bigger diagonal...

28-inch 16:18 DualUp Monitor - 28MQ780-B | LG USA

Discover the 28-inch 16:18 DualUp Monitor that features USB Type-C™ and SDQHD Nano IPS Display. Find reviews, specs, and more for 28MQ780-B.

www.lg.com

 

[Dutch60]

Even 32"? I just got my BenQ SW321c and hooked to the MAC studio. Looks great. My main reason to get BenQ was as this setup is only for photography. I also have BenQ 2700PT but haven't hooked it up yet.

I think 4k is fine with a 32” screen. For a 27” maybe less so.

 

[nutritious]

What about the Alienware QD-OLED AW3423DW? It's just two inches larger, 175hz via displayport, and 3440 x 1400. This is a really impressive monitor with HDR and the enormous benefits of OLED. Reviews have been stellar.

These new high refresh rate OLED monitors for PCs are one reason (among others) I'm considering a switch back to a PC desktop machine, first time in a decade. These PC OLED monitors are tremendous if you've ever seen one in person.

Also, not a fan of the new Studio Display. 60hz is garbage, period, as is no HDR. I cannot understand how one of the most expensive monitors available doesn't have better refresh and HDR. And I'm not interested in paying for a monitor to have a CPU, pay for audio I don't need -- and then have to pay $400 more on top of the the $1599/$1899 base price for "height adjustment."

yeah, apple hasn't really made a desktop I wanted since the 2010 mac pro. I tried using a macbook pro as a stopgap because the 2010 mac pro lasted me such a long time (i had upgraded the cpus, drives, and gpu on it), but once I saw the mac studio, I knew I was done. A glued up machine that you can't upgrade for that much money without a competitive GPU. No thanks. I built me a computer and got me an oled monitor and I am happy i left. And whatever they do with the new mac pro, i know I won't be interested. I don't want apple silicone in my computer and a proprietary desktop machine I can't upgrade without spending a ton for overpriced hardware from apple. They're just not appealing machines. And the performance of m1 is overrated. Very good performance per watt, i'll give them that. But you can get something like a razer blade on the windows side with a much better GPU and AMD is making huge strides in performance per watt on the notebook side. Apple really has become more a lifestyle brand.

 

[Sharky II]

I think you’re on the wrong forum then buddy

 

[TheFloridaPhotog]

I'm currently using a pair of Benq PD3220U's. I've been extremely happy.

 

[koalamilk]

Big difference. The Gigabyte monitor is 4k 144hz while the Dell is just 4k 60hz

Hello, I'm also in the market for a 4k Monitor for my MBPM1. The monitor will be mainly used for office work Designing, coding etc but will also like to do some gaming potentially in the future. I also have a star tech docking station so not reliant on the USB-C connection but this is a nice to have.

I have whittled the list down to these two monitors: Dell G3223Q and Gigabyte M32U

Currently in the UK the Dell G3223Q is £400 while the M32U is £700. Whilst this isn't a huge issue as I am getting this partially expensed, it is still a factor to consider.

Regardless of the monitor I go for, it will be on an arm.

Does anyone have any experience with both of these monitors or any thoughts on which one out of these two to go for?

Based on the RTINGS comparison it seems to weigh a bit more in the Dell's favour. However from research it seems that the M32U seems to be the benchmark for entry level 4k monitors (source: Reddit and other forums) https://www.rtings.com/monitor/tool...-g3223q/27393/32378?usage=3623&threshold=0.10

Thanks!

 

[MacGizmo]

I have an LG 34” a Ultrawide 21:9 5K2K 5120x2160 with 4K resolution across an Ultrawide screen. I can’t imagine going back to 1080p or 1440p or giving up the width.

I have the same display. I can't even imagine going down to 3840x2160

 

[RobertPS]

I have whittled the list down to these two monitors: Dell G3223Q and Gigabyte M32U

Currently in the UK the Dell G3223Q is £400 while the M32U is £700. Whilst this isn't a huge issue as I am getting this partially expensed, it is still a factor to consider.

Regardless of the monitor I go for, it will be on an arm.

Does anyone have any experience with both of these monitors or any thoughts on which one out of these two to go for?

I tested a Dell G3223Q shortly after it launched last year. I returned it because of IPS glow and not coming out of standby when my Mac Studio woke from sleep.
I have been using a Gigabyte G32QC (1440p) monitor with my Mac Studio. It has better blacks (VA panel), no glow, works fine with the Studio and no standby problem. The resolution of course was better on the Dell, but only slightly sharper after scaling compared to the 1440p Gigabyte.
I now also have a 2020 27" i7 iMac, and that has the best display. Sharp, no IPS glow, all be it smaller.

 

[AdamSeen]

Any ideas if the new Mac Studio with HDMI 2.1 can simultaneously support:

1 x 4K display at 120/144hz?
1 x 2560x2880 display at 60hz (this crazy monitor) https://www.lg.com/uk/monitors/ergo-monitors/28mq780-b/This crazy

 

[Tymbo]

I’m looking for a monitor suggestion…

I currently have a Late 2015 27” iMac, which is a glorious 5k display. I love it, but I want to improve in the following areas:

I’d like to go ~21:9 ultrawide (34”-40”)
I’d like to experiment gaming at 75+ fps instead of 60 (this means I need 75hz, right?)
I’d like to see the exact same quality as I do on my iMac at its default resolution
I currently use the default resolution (2560x1440) and want the beauty to be just as similar, just at an ultrawide scale… what would this be??

Upon realizing my ”default resolution usage, do I perhaps not need a 5k monitor, or is it being 5k part of the magic in the beauty of Default?

Much appreciate any suggestions/advice.

 

[dimme]

Has anyone gone from a 27" iMac display to a 27" 2K display. I know the 27" iMac will be sharper but it it a night and day difference. I trying to decide between a 27" 4K monitor running at 2x scaling (1920x1080) or running a 27"2K at 2560x1440.
Thanks for you experience and thoughts

EDIT I should add my eyes are old