Given the MBA's relatively insignificant advantages - and substantial price premium - over the regular MB, it's hard not to see it as being aimed squarely at the same demographic.
I really need some advice! Would someone please help me out?
I sold my White MacBook a couple of months before the Keynote, due to the rumors of a new MacBook! Waheyy!
Anyway, I'm not bothered about the lack of an optical drive - I am slightly worried about 1 USB port and a small hard drive. Not to mention no AUDIO INPUT!
I'm a music producer/DJ and need enough power to run Propellerhead Reason, Cubase, Logic and Serato Scratch. If this little thing has the power to do this then I WILL buy one - as lugging the fairly weighty MacBook to clubs and bars, along with a bag of vinyl is annoying.
I want to put ALL my music on an external drive anyway - including ripping all my old Vinyl - therefore all I'd have to take is the MBA, Serato and a pair of cans! That would be soooo cool, especially with such a lightweight notebook.
Soooo, will the 1.8Ghz version run Reason, Cubase & Logic well? These are the most resource intensive apps I use!
Oh, and I'm going to New York with my school on the 13th February. We are visiting the Cube Apple Store lol. Would I be able to buy one over there and take it back with me?
Are there any differences to worry about?
Thanks, Joe.
it should be fine i run thos apps on a old emac and there just as quick as a macbook. bringing it back to the uk is fine just need to pick up either a socket adapter or the travel kit by apple and it will work, there built for both powersettings, but think wisly about the MBA is it the right product for you? no audio input would kill me! and getting thru customs is fine, i was too carefull, i posted back the instruction manual and things like that and put my MBP in a old used case and walked thru, there was no one there!!! but it is breaking the law. blah blab blah! if ur under 18 i belive there might be a rule were u can get away with it !
Okay, also its been like 4 years since the PB 12inch.
In that period we have saved 1.6 lbs with a bit larger of a screen, but no optical drive, no removable battery, many fewer ports.
Wouldn't a PB 12inch with the only change being an LED screen go down to like 4lbs? It would also be say 0.8 or 0.9 inches thick.
So all that engineering and 4 years of advances saved us 1lb and a touch of thickness at the price of more width and length (again if you exclude the LED).
Sorry but this does not sound right. The size of the drive should have nothing to do with it.
Some areas of a disk are written more offten than others, and some areas may never get written over.
How many times a single byte can be written over before it fails to hold a value?
That is the worst case scenario and we then take it from there to a better value by projecting that only 16% (pick a number) or so of the drive would be subject to that level of activity. Then add to that the ability to move a sector and you get better numbers. But you have to start with the worst case, so the size of the drive should not be a main consideration. Most people dont write into a drive from one end to another and start again, the writes are not that distributed or random.
Sorry
Sorry, but for someone who travels a lot, a 40-50% reduction in weight is not 'relatively insignificant'.
Because $3000 in the US is in our native currency. Your euro buys a lot more than a dollar does. By the way we're heading into a recession here and I believe it's risky timing for Apple to be relying on fashion items for their lineup.
Now let's use these reasons for the MacBook Air:
1) The MacBook Air, far from being agile, is dramatically underpowered. It's much less 'agile" than a cheap four-seat car or a cheap, thicker laptop. It will
be much less fun to drive than a normal laptop for half the price.
2) The MacBook Air's footprint is the same as a normal laptop or a "four-set car". You can't fit it anywhere you can't fit a normal laptop, except an envelope. My productivity and "driving pleasure" are SEVERELY REDUCED inside an envelope.
3) The power/weight ratio of a MacBook Air is almost exactly the same as a MacBook. Not to mention that a 5 pound laptop is hardly a great burden, the number is so small that it's irrelevant. Cutting off two pounds doesn't change anyone's experience in any meaningful way.
4) The wind will blow through your hair a lot better on a thicker laptop than it will with the underpowered MacBook AIr.
In short, the reasons for a Miata have nothing to do with the reasons for a MacBook Air, and that's essentially because there are no reasons for a MacBook Air at all. This computer will make The Cube look like a great product success.
You might want to consider that there are new rules on how many batteries you can carry with you while flying now.
At 5 hours usage with the network running (Apple's figures so it might be more or less)
People always complain about integrated batteries but people still buy them anyway (the iPod would have been DOA if this reason actually mattered).
The only way into your Air through a wire is USB, so no matter what you clip onto the outside, you're limited to USB speeds. If you want to use an external mouse (not crazy at all) while the transfer is in progress, you need a USB hub, which is going to slow it down even more.
The whole concept is about Wireless.
Am I the only one who does this? Maybe I am.
No compromises. The best of portable when I want it; best at the desk when I need it.
No, you're not. This demographic is bar far the largest chunk of corporate laptop users. It's also why the small laptops by Toshiba, Dell, IBM, etc (WITH DOCKING STATIONS) are so popular.
However, the corporate laptop (indeed, the corporate customer in general) is not Apple's target market. I eagerly await the day I can get a ~13" (or even 15") MBP and an accompanying docking station, but I can't see it happening any time soon and I'm pretty sure my next work laptop will need to be a PC. Oh well, maybe I can make a Hackintosh out of it...
Probably in 2 weeks from now you should see them showing up in the Apple stores.
but this thing is definitely GORGEOUS...everybody I talked to was impressed, even if it's not a full-blown machine but more like a companion notebook...
Unlikely to be more .
A big issue is that the Core 2 Duo is actually quite a power pig when you make it work hard. My 2.33GHz Core 2 Duo Dell says that it should get about 8 hrs (with two batteries) when I start it up and leave it alone for a few minutes. If I push it (say do some compiling or photo manipulation and run some other stuff in a virtual machine) I can flatten both batteries in an hour and a half. Hint: If the fan comes on, check the battery gauge....
So even if Apple's 5 hours is honest (for the load that they put on the machine for the test), doing some work on the machine could easily cut that in half.
You didn't talk to people at Macworld, though, or me....
The Iphone is gorgeous.
On the other hand, the MBA looks like a nice update to the Dell Latitude X1. (Except that the X1 is smaller, lighter, with a full complement of ports, and a replaceable battery. The X1 is just thicker)
If you don't believe me - do a search for "macbook air" and "latitude x1", and look at all of the commentary comparing the two.
Ive is now copying old Dell designs, but the fanbois don't notice. Nice job of making it thin (at the expense of a lot of practicality), but it could easily be mistaken for an updated X1 at first glance.
Actually Apple is the ONLY company where battery life estimations are likely to be shorter than reality...just check the latest iPods and Macworld's findings...
You didn't talk to people at Macworld, though, or me....
The Iphone is gorgeous.
On the other hand, the MBA looks like a nice update to the Dell Latitude X1. (Except that the X1 is smaller, lighter, with a full complement of ports, and a replaceable battery. The X1 is just thicker)
Comparing Apples/OS X with Dells/Vista? No, thanks, this is a no-brainer... But I wasn't expecting you to support my statements anyway...there are fanboys on both sides of the fence, you know...