Why didn't you link to the actual report? Why didn't the Daily Mail (*cough*) link to the actual report? Have you read the actual report?
If you really want to know , around four years ago I had a chat with one of these gold recyclers from China . He was actually happy to have a job from the countryside , despite its dangerous nature . He was only wearing one of those anti smog face masks at work , worthless against toxic fumes . I thought he was nuts because if he kept that up it'd kill him . For a while , I actually stopped recycling because I thought it was doing harm to innocent people .
"For one, the article is from 2011. For two, the ewaste it talks about originates in China. It literally says it comes from brokers who go from door to door in large Chinese cities soliciting ewaste. This is not a problem of the west dumping its stuff on China."
Does it really matter where the waste comes from or where its piling up ? At MR , we have an international audience . A lot of what we discuss in the forums helps to keep , at least , Apple products useful longer , so they don't have to be recycled yet .
In my Midwestern city , we have an extensive and local municipally run recycling program for waste paper , plastics and glass . It's so efficient it actually makes the city a small profit . But we aren't sophisticated enough to handle electronics . It all goes elsewhere ... where , if not to some Asian or African country ? It's so expensive to recycle electronics in the West I'm quite certain a lot of rules are being bent .
"Please make sure that the problem you are touting up actually still exists. The Cuyahoga is not on fire any more. Please fix your attention on the problems that actually exist today.
Besides, whether CPUs are soldered or not will make not one damn bit of difference to ewaste streams."
Please don't put words in my mouth . I never claimed that site in Africa was on fire . Just that piles of waste were growing because the locals can't efficiently handle the recycling issue . That was just two years ago .
And yes , it does matter very much if servers and workstations can be cost effectively upgraded and repaired . LGA sockets are important because BGA is the early kiss of death . I work with this gear and I know how incredibly over-engineered and over-manufactured business machines are compared to consumer products . Most of what Apple makes are consumer products . Some are in the quasi-enterprise classification ( the PowerMac G4 , G5 and Mac Pros ) . The durability of these products is amazing . I still service three PMG4s for commercial clients . One of my air cooled PowerMac G5s still is the beating heart of the oldest radio advertising firm in the MidWest . The lifespan of these rigs , properly maintained and upgraded must be around 25 years . A number of my Mac Pro builds have been in service for more than a decade and show no sign of needing retirement . All this gear doesn't have to be recycled yet because it still is cost effective and can do the job . And much of this gear would have wound up prematurely in the 'ol ash heap if everything is soldered and glued tight .
Apple moving in this direction is about as anti-green as can be imagined . They talk about virtue but have trouble practicing what they preach . Telling people how great a program they have for recycling something that is designed to prematurely become functionally worthless doesn't cut it in my book . It's a form of planned obsolescence and I , as a former manufacturer , think that's just a wrong world view .