The noise? If you do that, the thing is gonna sound like a jet engine in your room.I wonder what is stopping apple going the imac pro route ? You can already fit dual desktop class pascal gpus in laptops.
The noise? If you do that, the thing is gonna sound like a jet engine in your room.I wonder what is stopping apple going the imac pro route ? You can already fit dual desktop class pascal gpus in laptops.
The noise? If you do that, the thing is gonna sound like a jet engine in your room.
nmp is a sprinter vanThe oMP was a pretty truck. The nMP is just pretty.
no, it's too thick. new iMac Pro will be thinner.The chassis is too thin.
This my prediction too. It's implausible that Apple would introduce a new form factor when there has only been a single model shipped. The simplest easiest & most cost effective route is to ship a new model with upgraded internal components just like they have always done with every other Mac.There's no reason for a change of form factor. The tube is great. They don't have to reduce the volume or the size, they don't have to reduce the amount of ports since they are not making it any smaller. It'll come with TB3, updated GPU's CPU's SSD's and Memory. Just like we expect it to be. Phil said this is the form factor for the next 10 years.
nmp is a sprinter van
Apple is going nowhere, all they're working on is iphone, watch bands and minecraft on apple tv. Oh and emojis of course.
If they'd given in to a eGPU solution there probably wouldn't be so many complaints about the Mac Pro, that's the only glaring weakness.
Personally, I'd love to see Apple going the Steve Ballmer route.Makes sense since it's better for business.
But I really don't want Apple to go the Steve Ballmer route of just making the board of trustees happy.
Great idea, here is the address for Apple so you can drop your own truth bomb:Steve Jobs was the kind of person to drop truth bombs and jolt the system and fire people on the spot for screwing up. There was a reason he did this. I'm not saying it's good or bad, but someone needs to do that.
If they weren't so darn obsessed with anorexic design, the pros could be happy with the power now while Ive and co continue to shave millimetres every six months. By the time they are happy, the hardware would have shrunk enough to keep both desirables satisfied... power & design
The oMP was a pretty truck. The nMP is just pretty.
There's no reason for a change of form factor. The tube is great.
Lack of a second CPU...
I wasn't talking about the z1s and the iMac...I was talking about the oMPs and the nMPs...no, they'd still be damn loud. The HP Z1 workstations we have are much, much thicker than the post 2012 iMacs we have and they are also much, much louder when they're going full tilt. I imagine they will still get your work done faster since they won't be as likely to throttle while they're wailing like a banshee, but still. Sure, I imagine Apple could put its design chops to making something quieter than HP, but you're still fighting basic laws of thermodynamics. The nMP is an impressive design because it had to basically reinvent a form factor to actually work as intended; barring some significant rethinking of an AIO design I don't see any way you're going to get enough power for the people who demand bleeding edge performance into those designs.* Meanwhile, the iMac already *is* the iMac Pro for most use cases. The only reason to have gotten a Mac Pro even in the last few years of the cMP was if you needed gobs of ECC RAM, a lot of internal storage, and could leverage multiple cores. Even for most pros, that's a shrinking set of uses (shrunk further by Apple's own narrowing of its product line.) Especially since Apple has stepped up its game recently and has been pushing out great monitors and basically giving the panel away (making the lack of a standalone display even more sad...) if you're a visual professional you're getting a lot more out of them out of the box.
*The Surface basically just seems like it's an oversized Mac mini with a monitor attached, and its geared to a more specific use case than even the Mac Pros, so it's not exactly a revolutionary next step for the form either.
Still worth buying nMP with discount?For nMP owners, Apple now sells a TB3 to TB2 adapter. It brings the new port to older systems. That should mean nMP gets full speed access to USB 3.1 devices and half speed access to TB3 devices (if they are capable of using all that speed anyway).
It means the Akitio Node should be able to connect to the nMP (and other pre-2016 Macs with TB).
Sierra is required for the adapter to work.
Still worth buying nMP with discount?
Used as in refurbished? Hmm.... You do have a point.Used quad core could be the best Mac Pro to buy ATM. That adapter just gave it new life and possibilities.
Used as in refurbished? Hmm.... You do have a point.
Another good point....dang. I still have 5,1 so...i'm good for now. Thanks!I would wait until the cMP is no longer OS upgradable. Greedy vendors are now hiking the price of used nMP just because Apple bumped the prices up.
No? The Xeon range is expansive. Why would you think it costs a fortune?How much would a dual Xeon cost these days? The prices are pretty horrifying. The Mac Pro is a great design concept, though, I'd love an i7 version of it, but it also requires a ton of custom PCB.
For nMP owners, Apple now sells a TB3 to TB2 adapter. It brings the new port to older systems. That should mean nMP gets full speed access to USB 3.1 devices and half speed access to TB3 devices (if they are capable of using all that speed anyway).