That’s a $5,000 machine right there. I bought my Mac mini m2 pro 512/16 for $750 with 2.5 years of AppleCare+ left. That m2 pro will easily get me to the M6 and I’ll have no regrets about missing the M3/M4/M5 because I’ll be using the machine bs griping about my i3 intel iMac that it replaced that I got 10 years out of. I’m now doing a few things that require more power but the M2 pro will handle the load for another 2-4 years.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No new M3 Mac Studio. No new adult size iMac…. for YEARS.
- Thread starter Suzzzabelle
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I was in same situation waiting to 'trade up to a new Mac' from my 2011 iMac. With the arrival of the M1s I thought the iMac would get the 27" option... nope.
After a 1.5yr half of torturous waiting (due to the endless rumor-mill), I had to settle for an M1 Studio with Apple Display for about double what an 27" iMac should have been.
Personally I don't need MORE power, I need a larger screen (with better camera) and more affordable memory.
waiting for the day I can 'trade down' to a 27" (hopefully 30-32") iMac with 4-6K graphics and iPhone pro quality built-in cam. (The ASD cam is a very real disappointment)
After a 1.5yr half of torturous waiting (due to the endless rumor-mill), I had to settle for an M1 Studio with Apple Display for about double what an 27" iMac should have been.
Personally I don't need MORE power, I need a larger screen (with better camera) and more affordable memory.
waiting for the day I can 'trade down' to a 27" (hopefully 30-32") iMac with 4-6K graphics and iPhone pro quality built-in cam. (The ASD cam is a very real disappointment)
Last edited:
Apple has (basically) infinite financial resources, but the number of engineers is very finite. Updating desktops every year while the few people (relative to laptop buyers) who still buy them keep them for 5-10 years is a waste of those finite engineering resources.
Sure, it sucks buying a desktop with older silicon if you need one now, but the majority of customers prefer new phones, tablets and laptops, so Apple is is putting more resources into those departments.
Why not go with a Mac mini over the studio? Would have saved you $1,000-$1,500. The cost of a higher end iMac.
I replaced my 2014 27 inch iMac with a studio display and M2 Max and love it but with equal part massive regret! a beefed up iMac m3 would of just been as good for me. I think I put the screen size as too big of a factor when in reality you just get use to what you have.
The 27 inch studio felt too small for a while but only cos it didn’t have a big chin ha
The 27 inch studio felt too small for a while but only cos it didn’t have a big chin ha
But can you take advantage of a 50% faster benchmark? It has gotten to the point that for most people it is the operator that limits real day to day operations
Discontinuing the 27" iMac is one of the few actually eco-friendly things Apple has done. What doesn't make sense from an environmental standpoint?
- A still perfectly-functional computer with a useless cracked screen.
- A still perfectly-functional screen with an obsolete decade-old computer inside.
Baldurs Gate 3 runs just fine on my M2Pro mini
Apple studio ultra is still the king for many workflows. Mac Studio and Mac Pro will always be treated differently given that Ultra is desktop level chip. Apple may not decide to have ultra every Mx version. My M1 Max is still going strong, I will probably upgrade to M6 or so, unless Apple comes with M4 ultra with 256 GB unified memory.
M4 Max and Ultra will come, hopefully soon, and they will be HUGE.
This post is a bit confusing because you say you're currently using an "ancient iMac" but also that you need something above and beyond the Mac Studios that are available.
Maybe. But not everyone upgrades at the same time. So there’s definitely a need to have new iMacs every year for the people that need it that year
I’m a programmer. The problem with MacBooks is not the performance, it’s the screen. They’re all tiny. Having to switch between the ide and the terminal because you can only realistically fit 1 window at a time is so tiresome and annoying.
Use an external screen with MBP, the same screen you would with a Mac Studio. if you are on the move, use built in screen.
Irrelevant. Nobody wants to see the resale value plummet just a few months after purchase. Besides, it might not matter today, but in a few years, your machine couldve lasted a few years longer, had you only waited for the latest gen tech.
There is incredible pent up demand for an Apple silicon larger screen iMac. The only logical explanation(s) I can think of… 1. The COVID/supply chain debacle set back Apple 2-3 years. M4 is finally the chip they meant to launch … a while ago: the correct TSMC die shrink & easier to fab, ARM v9, updated GPU, and at the performance and TEMPERATURE levels needed to put in a slim chassis… 2. They could have launched sooner with a less ideal chip M2 or M3(although they will quickly discontinue the M3) but they opted to hold back, waiting on a slow financial quarter where they can strategically unleash an iMac that will kill it in revenue. These sell in large qtys to companies & institutions … eg Art Depts/Music studios & classrooms will snatch these up on day 1 of launch.
Feel your pain re the larger iMac. I was waiting for several years but finally gave up after the Mac Studio/ASD keynote, as I realised it might be years away. I bought a base 16" MBP to tide me over until the eventual iMac Pro, but ended up realising that the MBP was actually the right choice, as I love the ability to use it as a competent desktop (when plugged into an XDR) and as an amazing laptop. Recently upgraded to the M3 Max MBP and loving the combo even more - don't think I'd ever go back to an iMac or Apple desktop when the high end MBPs are so damn good now.
Appreciate if you need the power of the Ultra then that's not an option, and must be frustrating. The ASD is also way overpriced for what it is, compared to the value that the old 27" iMacs provided.
The larger iMac crowd (along with Mac Pro users) were definitely the casualties of the AS transition - the price of a Mac Studio + ASD + accessories, compared with a decently specced 27" iMac, is really sad.
Appreciate if you need the power of the Ultra then that's not an option, and must be frustrating. The ASD is also way overpriced for what it is, compared to the value that the old 27" iMacs provided.
The larger iMac crowd (along with Mac Pro users) were definitely the casualties of the AS transition - the price of a Mac Studio + ASD + accessories, compared with a decently specced 27" iMac, is really sad.
Even if they run $6000 -$8000 each? Apple has said there will be no 27” iMac, but they left wiggle room that they might release an iMac with even a larger screen (30-32”). And look at the price Apple charges for their current 32” XDR monitor.
At my company they no longer offer desktops at all - laptops only. My department has always had 50 iMacs that are in desperate need of updating and when we asked for the company to make an exception, we were told that our technology vendor (which isn't Apple directly) no longer caries desktop computers at all. It's crazy.
Bought m2 ultra studio last year and it’s been fantastic. Great time to buy Apple desktop.
Problem is iMac is small percentage of Mac revenue. Mac line up is dominated my MBP, MBA and desktops according to various analysts reports are around 10%. iMac and AIO don’t sell as much. Apple is mostly a mobile device company, be it phones, iPad or Macs. Been that way for a while. They have a Mac Studio with Apple display, not the same but l doubt Apple will release 27 iMac.
Yep. I’m quite unhappy with the current situation. I find it ridiculous that my M3 Max outperforms my M2 Ultra in many workflows.
I despise stationary laptops so Apple put more attention in your desktops. The iPad did not need an M4. The M1 iPad is still over powered. My grandma buying a MacBook Air doesn’t need a newer chip than pros do.
I despise stationary laptops so Apple put more attention in your desktops. The iPad did not need an M4. The M1 iPad is still over powered. My grandma buying a MacBook Air doesn’t need a newer chip than pros do.
Just opt for MacBook Pro 16-inch. These are not your typical laptops with shortcomings that are expected with the notebook form factor from years of past. Apple Silicon has raised the bar so much that these units are now desktops on the go. They are zippy as hell. They can operate for long hours like it's nothing. They are built like tanks. Trust me, you won't miss a desktop.