You should, since if you're a US citizen you're paying for your Candy Crush high score to be spied on.
Not on US citizens.
We're paying for the NSA to see foreigners' Candy Crush high scores.
You should, since if you're a US citizen you're paying for your Candy Crush high score to be spied on.
You should, since if you're a US citizen you're paying for your Candy Crush high score to be spied on.
But yes, I trust google more than the NSA.
There's no "spying" going on. I couldn't care less, honestly.
Big mistake. Imagine the day Larry Page decides to run for president. Oh, by the way, he has insider access to all your Gmails and Google searches and Google Maps inquiries and Google Chats and Google Calendar items and Google Voice call information for the past 10+ years. Are you going to dare run against him?
Really? So if you are from EU its ok that they spy on you but if from US then its not? You remind me the famous saying below:
"First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out-- Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me--and there was no one left to speak for me."
Do you not see that this whole spying business is making matter worse for not only US but rest of the world?
Are you still of the personal opinion that metadata was private communications, even though Supreme court cases like Smith vs. Maryland explicitly stated it wasn't?
So why is it that it is ok for the government to spy on its citizens but not for its citizens to sky on its government? Exactly who controls who again?
Not on US citizens.
We're paying for the NSA to see foreigners' Candy Crush high scores.
I have never seen a release about spying on actual communications of Americans.
The US government records all email communications of all american citizens. Not sure how much more clear cut it could be.
As long as they're foreign targets, it's fine.
US Citizenship - membership has its privileges.
No Tim Cook, I am not more at ease after hearing this information.
I really don't get why people are making such a deal over this. I know I'm opening myself up to being totally and utterly slammed here, but I really don't think the NSA gives a damn about your Angry Birds high score or what you're sending to your Dropbox.
I would guess that about 99.99% is read by a computer infrastructure of some kind, looking out for keywords. Unless you're hiding something that you should be genuinely worried about being uncovered, why all this worry? A computer doesn't judge you (unless its your credit rating, granted) and it's very unlikely a human will ever read it.
So, unless you're looking up explosives or pornography of a particularly evil nature - why worry about a computer scanning your stuff? You probably give more data inadvertently to advertising companies.
Disclaimer: I'm a UK citizen - GCHQ does the same thing.
Really?
So Google's facilities are secured by faraday cages and armed guards (among a million other classified/unclassified techniques) like military facilities?
The US government records all email communications of all american citizens. Not sure how much more clear cut it could be.
A) People like you, with such narrow minded views and disregard for everyone else suck.
B) Fat chance if you think this only applies to non US nationals, if you honestly kept drinking that kool-aid you have been utterly ignorant.
LOL!! There are no words...As long as they're foreign targets, it's fine. US Citizenship - membership has its privileges.
I really don't get why people are making such a deal over this. I know I'm opening myself up to being totally and utterly slammed here, but I really don't think the NSA gives a damn about your Angry Birds high score or what you're sending to your Dropbox.
I would guess that about 99.99% is read by a computer infrastructure of some kind, looking out for keywords. Unless you're hiding something that you should be genuinely worried about being uncovered, why all this worry? A computer doesn't judge you (unless its your credit rating, granted) and it's very unlikely a human will ever read it.
So, unless you're looking up explosives or pornography of a particularly evil nature - why worry about a computer scanning your stuff? You probably give more data inadvertently to advertising companies.
Disclaimer: I'm a UK citizen - GCHQ does the same thing.
A) People like you, with such narrow minded views and disregard for everyone else suck.
B) Fat chance if you think this only applies to non US nationals, if you honestly kept drinking that kool-aid you have been utterly ignorant.
Only on metadata, which is legal.
----------
If you think the NSA spies on Americans, show it.
The supreme court has already ruled that bulk metadata collection is legal, and doesn't violate 4th amendment privacy rights, since metadata is the information you give to the public to route your private communications.
This is how the networks work. Unfortunately, since Snowden has a limited education, being a high-school dropout and all, he didn't understand this, and went ahead and stole all the classified information he could and released it on his own, because of his narcissism.
If you're hero is a narcissistic high-school dropout, you need better heroes.
A decision that predates the internet? Yeah, I am. You STILL have yet answer if the data is Americans or not.
Only on metadata, which is legal.