Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
The entire pro line is unacceptable and for me thats sad to say cause I am a pro use that switched to the air. One thing I can't stand is people making excuses and just jumping on a company's adverts. Switching from titanium back to aluminum then calling it a better material is utter nonsense. Using titanium gave apple the ability to make a phone slimmer and just as strong as aluminum. The giant bump along the top was done because aluminum has to be thicker and they needed room. Saying the phone using aluminum is better for heat dissipation then adding a vapor chamber, come on. The three colors are the cheapest looking colors and implementation of color ever on any iPhone. The 17's look far more premium. It's heavier, thicker, taller, and wider than the previous pro. Which was already pushing the boundaries of a usable one handed device. I don't like it at all and hopefully next year they don't play us for fools.
 
One thing I can't stand is people making excuses and just jumping on a company's adverts.

This.

What difference does it make how many units are affected by a particular hardware flaw? Every year there will be at least some issues and we discuss them. Why people become defensive about this and feel the need to talk down anyone discussing problems in a new device is beyond me. You didn't make the device and Apple doesn't need your help on an online forum. Now you go into a thread where the topic is something that is or at least seems to be an issue with a new device and you get lessons in math and English.
 
So far, all the hardware issues known with the 17 Pro series:

  • Aluminum body dents and scratches upon impacts even when the phone is in a case
  • Speaker makes buzzing/static noises when the phone is charging and/or listening to audio on very low volumes
  • Back camera module makes a clicking sound whenever opening the camera app and/or switching lenses
  • Front camera/Face ID sensors make a clicking noise when Face ID activates

Feel free to add any other issues you’ve experienced. This is a ridiculous level of hardware issues for a Pro phone.

If you seem to think none of these issues exist, refer to the links below:



But, you don't own one, do you? ;)
 
"Number of hardware issues on the Pros this year is unacceptable"
The guy doesn't even own one.
The heading should be, Number of hardware issues on the Airs this year is unacceptable!
I mean, I’m going to pick up my 3rd one today, so technically you’re right but only for about a few hours? 😂
 
But I know you don’t have the option to do that so it must be hard to see :p
The carrier and the shops give 14 day normal return window, Amazon gives 30 day return window. And, all of them give you 2-year warranty, which you don't have in your strange country. By the way, it's Apple that sells through Amazon.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kulan
This.

What difference does it make how many units are affected by a particular hardware flaw? Every year there will be at least some issues and we discuss them. Why people become defensive about this and feel the need to talk down anyone discussing problems in a new device is beyond me. You didn't make the device and Apple doesn't need your help on an online forum. Now you go into a thread where the topic is something that is or at least seems to be an issue with a new device and you get lessons in math and English.
It isn't being defensive it's being offensive.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive and zkap
Clearly it could be a part of the functionality but it’s not present on all the Pro devices, and definitely not on past generations, so that just tells me there is something wrong with the hardware assembly on the ones that click into place.
This issue has been experienced by a some users over the years. It's not a new complaint, it pops up every release cycle.
 
This.

What difference does it make how many units are affected by a particular hardware flaw? Every year there will be at least some issues and we discuss them. Why people become defensive about this and feel the need to talk down anyone discussing problems in a new device is beyond me. You didn't make the device and Apple doesn't need your help on an online forum. Now you go into a thread where the topic is something that is or at least seems to be an issue with a new device and you get lessons in math and English.

why do you insist on one sided discussions? Sure let's discuss issues, but important to that discussion for future buyers with critical thinking is frequency. Are those issues personal, as most here are, or are they a design choice? If its every device, well thats something to consider (like the air's one speaker), but if its some random literally one in a million thing.. well.. that probably wont heavily influence my buying decision.

Another thing absent from most of these discussions is some clue about manufacturing economics. Everyone likes to complain Apple devices are too expensive, but if Apple were to make them to the expectations of this forum the costs would likely be double. Apple's quality program is budgeted out to catch the large majority of issues, but it's a common business practice of all manufactured goods that a certain return rate due to defects can be expected. Want to reduce that rate? Build in an even larger tighter QC program. Either way, it's built into the cost. So with the handful, or even 100's let's say, of negative posts, out of 10 million sold, that likely represents the return rate, not a widespread issue.

To some of us that is important to know. But some of us buy devices to use them, not to find faults.
 
Last edited:
You don't seem capable of having a discussion without making it personal, but why do you insist on one sided discussions? Sure let's discuss issues, but important to that discussion for future buyers with critical thinking is frequency. Are those issues personal, as most here are, or are they a design choice? If its every device, well thats something to consider (like the air's one speaker), but if its some random literally one in a million thing.. well.. that probably wont heavily influence my buying decision. Thats called critical thinking. They used to teach that in school along side English and Math.

Another thing absent from most of these discussions is some clue about manufacturing economics. Everyone likes to complain Apple devices are too expensive, but if Apple were to make them to the expectations of this forum the costs would likely be double. Apple's quality program is budgeted out to catch the large majority of issues, but it's a common business practice of all manufactured goods that a certain return rate due to defects can be expected. Want to reduce that rate? Build in an even larger tighter QC program. Either way, it's built into the cost. So with the handful, or even 100's let's say, of negative posts, out of 10 million sold, that likely represents the return rate, not a widespread issue.

To some of us that is important to know. But some of us buy devices to use them, not to find faults.
I agree 100% with this and couldn’t have said it better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: G5isAlive
Using a higher grade Aluminum would have alleviated some problems. However weight of iPhone and coast to Apple would have gone up
There’s no happy medium with Aluminum
An alloy might have been better
 
Anyone noticed that photos from 17 Pro are not sharp enough? Almost blurry. Any other phone outcompetes it in terms of natural sharpness.

What is going on? Is that HDR? Maybe a system bug or weird processing?

I am in general not a fond of Apple’s warm, overly HDRed and artificially sharpened approach, but there are literally some issues with all camera modules, images are not sharp enough and blurrier than on old devices
 
  • Haha
Reactions: slippery-pete
Anyone noticed that photos from 17 Pro are not sharp enough? Almost blurry. Any other phone outcompetes it in terms of natural sharpness.

What is going on? Is that HDR? Maybe a system bug or weird processing?

I am in general not a fond of Apple’s warm, overly HDRed and artificially sharpened approach, but there are literally some issues with all camera modules, images are not sharp enough and blurrier than on old devices
Bigger thread about this here: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/unimpressed-with-17-series-camera-quality.2467290/
 
  • Like
Reactions: miemo and uacd
haha, that was my thread:) Didn’t want to revoke it, so asked people here as well. Smh youtubers seem not to notice the issue, but it is noticeable on photo samples on the web and even in videos.

I waited long for 17 Pro only to realize this phone has such an issue. I mean I can understand HDR and sharpening but there is something on the deeper level going on, maybe a bug or lens issue (which is worse)
 
They cry when the same old ‘boring design’ comes out.
They cry when a new, experimental relatively radical design comes out.

New iPhone designs have always had some issue… Apple have always sorted it. Be it a service program… an extended refund policy… a good will gesture of a full refund well outside that window (sometimes after a year in my experience)…

They also learn in future iterations. The Butterfly Keyboard is the greatest case study…
 
  • Love
Reactions: slippery-pete
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.