Knowing this is kind of horrifying.
Many of our over the counter, and prescription drugs are made in India! Aleve, Zyrtec, Tylenol, etc, etc...
Why make them in India? Ask those corporations. I think they should find another country to press their pills. It's already known that many prescription drug manufacturers don't clean the machines well between batches of unrelated pharmaceuticals. (Always amazed I can spell that word without using spell check)
Was thinking EXACTLY this… extrapolating to anything else: “airbags deploy 50% of the time”, “brakes fail 50% of the time”, “landing gear lowers completely 50% of the time”.this also the reason why gm, ford, and tesla won't touch indian market with a 10 foot pole.
Didn’t know about this part of the show… thought it was a happy fancy correct one. Now will watch it, I hate corruption (reason: coming from one of the worst countries ever)Only tangentially related, but it occurred to me that Apple TV+ cancelling Shantaram could be related to individuals in India feeling it shows the country in a poor light. The show was given the green light well before Covid, and much more than ever, Apple needs the cooperation of governments in India to expand manufacturing efforts in the country.
i couldn’t imagine Apple giving the go ahead today for a similar show that is set against government corruption in China.
Was thinking EXACTLY this… extrapolating to anything else: “airbags deploy 50% of the time”, “brakes fail 50% of the time”, “landing gear lowers completely 50% of the time”.
One commenter said that there are actually good hand picked examples, however, just a handful of very bad ones is enough to lose all trust (in any country, in any domain, in any activity).
one in every two components coming off the production line "is in good enough shape" to be sent forward to assembly at Foxconn.
If you think Apple should reduce its profit margins to increase its market share, It might make for an interesting experiment. But in the history of capitalism, most outfits charge whatever the market will bear. If enough Apple customers feel as you do, Apple will have to adjust its offerings or lose market share. If Apple's hardware products continue to be objects of desire for millions around the world, maybe not so much.No news for me, I wrote ”too much profit”. The shareholders demand an ever increasing profit, and that money comes from the likes of me and you. Or not. I'm into Apple's eco system and like it a lot, but there is a pecuniary limit for me what it is worth. As of today, I cannot see myself buying a new iPhone next time. But, perhaps there will be no more iPhones...
Fair enough, true that.I can't get to the paywalled FT article, but the MR summary is pretty clear that what you're describing isn't the case:
The bad parts don't make it to final assembly. Airbags, breaks and landing gear have upstream defects as well, but they're stopped at test and inspection before final assembly to avoid failures in the field as are the iPhone parts.
So I'm arguing from a set of observed facts--any time there are large numbers of young people, statistically some portion will attempt suicide. You are I guess disputing this relationship because you have never attempted suicide. Who's the emotional one?I moved out of my parents at 16. I worked for my keep, graduated school, and left for the military and relocated across the country by 21. I never felt the need to jump off the roof, even in the military. Your argument sounds more emotional than factual.
If you don't see that you have a characterized view of China, I don't think there is much I can do to help you. People travel long distances within China for the OPPORTUNITY to work in iPhone assembly. It's a desirable job there. Yes, those workers prefer to work long hours for additional pay and yes, they work quickly so they can keep the job, as your opportunity for the next contract depends on your productivity during the first one. Among the tens of thousands of workers in a contract cycle at any given time some will be dissatisfied and voice their dissatisfaction, but I don't see why any of this is fundamentally different from anywhere else and it's certainly not slavery.There is nothing free about living under the Chinese government. And yes, many are "assigned" to contracts, and only "willingly" sign said contracts or lose their employment entirely. China has a huge available work force, so it's no major inconvenience to industry to blackball the few who have the will to refuse what is being dictated to them, and it's been that way for a long time.
Don't believe me? In the U.S. college students are considered in economic terms an asset to be safeguarded. In China, they'll run them down and crush them with tanks if they dare protest for more freedoms.
Thanks for relaying her irrelevant anecdote.I remember listening to the Howard Stern show a number of years ago when Robin Quivers said she went on vacation to India. She said on the way from the airport to her hotel that what she saw and what she smelled disgusted her so much that she had the driver turn around and go back to the airport and she left without ever staying.
Also, the reason Chinese factories are able to produce Apple's hardware at "inexplicable speeds" is because : modern slavery. It's not because the Chinese workers in those factories are more skilled than the Indians or whatever, it's because the Chinese workers are under tremendous amounts of pressure to produce by an authoritarian regime that will literally kill them if they don't almost kill themselves working incredible long hours. It's not "inexplicable", it's how 80-90% of the modern supply chain works nowadays. But of course, we don't talk about that. Instead, we talk about how "inexplicable" it is... Come on
To prevent/reduce suicides.Then why the suicide prevention nets, I wonder?
Not day one. whatever. point stands, doesn't detract from the argument.
![]()
U.S. reinstates 352 product exclusions from China tariffs
The U.S. Trade Representative's office said on Wednesday it has reinstated 352 expired product exclusions from U.S. "Section 301" tariffs on Chinese imports, well short of the 549 exclusions that it was previously considering.www.reuters.com
Not so long ago any village would have had a working blacksmith who was among the highest paid and most respected occupants of the village. Is it bad that we don't anymore?"Mundane", skilled work is what keeps things going, my friend. I personally like indoor plumbing, good roads, electricity, and not having to wait weeks for shipments to be offloaded from ship to shore. The attitude that we should all seek to avoid such things is why we have such a critical shortage in nearly all of the skilled trades today, and it does not bode well for quality of life in the future if we fail to remedy that shortage. Skilled trades are often good paying jobs that with a little effort and consistency become very good paying jobs (tower crane operators in the United States make just under $95k/year on *average* and up to nearly $150k/year). That's a higher starting wage than most careers requiring a 4 year degree, with much less debt and a quicker path to raises and promotions. You do the math.
Plumbers make insane amounts of money relative to what they do. No college degree needed.
Electricians
Road/runway construction and paving (my nephew made in excess of $120k last year and he's 24 years old).
Pretty much any skilled trade, you name it, and you have a lower financial barrier to entry, in general make higher wages to start, and little to no debt to contend with, unlike their 4-6 year college graduate counterparts.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we should get rid of universities, either. I'm just saying we've done a disservice to ourselves as a nation and to at least 3 generations of kids by ignoring or worse intentionally guiding kids way from profitable careers simply because we've been sold the "college is the only path to success" con.
Just want to say that I enjoy reading your balanced and logical responses here.Not so long ago any village would have had a working blacksmith who was among the highest paid and most respected occupants of the village. Is it bad that we don't anymore?
Every unit of labor that can be replaced by machines and shifted to more interesting/valuable work is a win--the world to strive for is one where everyone is a scientist, in some broad sense.
You mean factory work for a very specific golden two decades after WW2. Before the productive capacity of all of the world but the US was destroyed, factory work was pretty grim.Because they don’t know what they’re missing, most people don’t.
They don’t know what it’s like having union protection, higher wages, decent benefits - entire generations have grown up never really knowing factory work in the United States. How can workers be missing something they’ve never had? They don’t know how much better their jobs could be…which is intentional of course.
There are about half a million licensed plumbers in the US. If we assume the typical career is 30 years, that means we need 500,000 * (1/30) = 16.6K plumbers entering the profession each year to maintain the current population. The US graduates ~4 million college graduates each year. The issues are on different scales. We in fact need more educated people, educated at a higher level, to drive innovation. The biggest problem in our society is the slow growth of innovation, which leads to the biggest improvements in productivity. We should be aiming to graduate university students who design robots or other systems that reduce the need for plumbers to as close to zero as possible. I strongly agree with you that US universities are misplaced in treating their product as a workplace credential.Plumbers make insane amounts of money relative to what they do. No college degree needed.
You do realise slavery doesn't have a floor, nor a ceiling, right? Slavery can exist under many forms at any period of time. Whether it's in the 1700s by forcing people to work in cotton fields, or in the 2000s by making people who have absolutely no upward mobility whatsoever work 6 days a week for 12 hours a day in a factory for just enough dollars an hour to afford a roof over their head and no real comfort in their off hours.
I have no idea who she is, but she sounds ridiculous, precious and narrow-minded. Did she not know anything about where she was going? I have been lucky enough to travel to half of the countries on earth, and I have loved my three trips to India. If you want to go to other countries, take the rough with the smooth... Robin Quivers sounds like she should stay at home. Anyway, as someone else said, Rome was not built in a day, and no doubt there were similar issues when production started in China.I remember listening to the Howard Stern show a number of years ago when Robin Quivers said she went on vacation to India. She said on the way from the airport to her hotel that what she saw and what she smelled disgusted her so much that she had the driver turn around and go back to the airport and she left without ever staying.
Imagine her disgust at having to look at poverty. It’s how most people in the world live.I remember listening to the Howard Stern show a number of years ago when Robin Quivers said she went on vacation to India. She said on the way from the airport to her hotel that what she saw and what she smelled disgusted her so much that she had the driver turn around and go back to the airport and she left without ever staying.
Agreed. I took a trip to Latin America and saw some banana plantations in a remote region.You do realise slavery doesn't have a floor, nor a ceiling, right? Slavery can exist under many forms at any period of time. Whether it's in the 1700s by forcing people to work in cotton fields, or in the 2000s by making people who have absolutely no upward mobility whatsoever work 6 days a week for 12 hours a day in a factory for just enough dollars an hour to afford a roof over their head and no real comfort in their off hours... I suggest you educate yourself on how these people live. There's a reason all these top companies are outsourcing production from China, because people are treated as nothing there and they're therefore very cheap to employ. They're stuck in a system that's rigged to make them expendable and cheap. They have NO choice. How is that not exploitation and therefore not a form of slavery? You just can't see it, is all. A contract doesn't mean anything, by the way, if you're forced to do that kind of work because your government has set you up to work there.
It's pretty disrespectful from your part to dismiss the working conditions of these people the way that you did right there. So, by your logic, because these people are not being whipped in fields under scorching heat, they can't be considered as slaves? They should just be 'happy', right? Why are they jumping off roofs? Why are there nets under the windows of these factories? Why are there bars in front of the windows? I could go on and on about how these people definitely are living like slaves, just in a modern world. Imma need you to take a big step back and literally take a good look at yourself so you can reevaluate your values, because this ain't it my guy.
I guarantee you if you worked in those conditions like these people for even just a few hours, you'd definitely call yourself a slave of the modern times. So, just stop dude
I don't really care what the definition of slavery is, to be honest. It might need redefining for modern times, then. Because if you go into these factories, learn about how these people are pretty much owned by the Chinese regime, and you STILL think these people are not like slaves, then that's incredibly sad as well.Slavery by definition means a worker is owned by someone else as property and is forced to work without pay or the choice of other jobs. While the labor conditions in these factories is not the best, the fact that you think it equates to slavery likely deeply offensive to people who have experienced actual modern day slavery, such as the Kafala system.
Sorry, but I'm going to stick with definitions. That's how we make rational arguments and come to reasonable conclusions with consensus.I don't really care what the definition of slavery is, to be honest. It might need redefining for modern times, then. Because if you go into these factories, learn about how these people are pretty much owned by the Chinese regime, and you STILL think these people are not like slaves, then that's incredibly sad as well.
Let's not get lost in definitions, let's look at how these humans are being treated and let's agree that they're being exploited. That's good enough for me to call them slaves. If you can't do that, I don't want to have this discussion anymore.
We haven't withered. Manufacturing output as a share of GDP in the USA has stayed constant at ~12% since the 1950s. The change is the share of employment in manufacturing, which has declined from 30% to 10%. Thus, we are making more with less, which is exactly the goal. We want to be a country of intellectual workers, not manual laborers, and eventually we want to be a world of intellectual workers. The most valuable thing we have as a species is our intelligence and the larger the share of time we are using our minds vs our muscles, the faster we will eliminate worldwide poverty and ensure every human on earth lives "their best life".China took 30 years. So what? We to start rebuilding sometime, or just wither. Short term thinking has become the American way. It used to not be. Americans used to care about future generations.
You are correct in that the problem is not "Rihanna" specifically. But it's not that college is expensive. Pop culture is more influential than ever before. While it has always been around, people now make real money on TikTok, YouTube, etc. Every kid is the next "star". Looking to do the next stupid thing to get views. Interest in "how the world works" is at a low and interest in what {TikTok star} is doing now is at an all-time high.Thanks for the shout-out, but I don't agree with your assessment of an average person or the Rihanna non-sequitur.
The problem is not Rihanna or liberal arts degrees. The problem is (1) college costs too much, but even if the cost was somehow brought down, (2) we don't have enough capacity in the colleges, but even if the cost was reasonable and we had the capacity, (3) our public education system is failing to set students up for success in college. All of these issues, at the end of the day, come down to funding and priorities.
As to 1 - US in-state tuition is about 2x the average public college tuition in Canada and Europe, and 4x the average public college tuition in China.
As to 2 - The US has about 15m public college undergrad seats total, which is enough to serve 4.5% of the population. I think we need to increase this to keep up with China.
As to 3 - I don't have hard and fast data for this, but it's concerning that engineering is one of the less popular majors. https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37 Anecdotally, I think the issue is we make it out to be this intimidating thing where only super nerds that got straight As in AP-level math and science can succeed. But that shouldn't be true.
You don't need to know how a pencil is made to be smart. Being a Rihanna fan and being a smart manufacturing engineer are not mutually exclusive.