So, Paragon is absolutely not faster either.
For me, Paragon not only works, but it's better than NTFS-3g for Mac in the following ways:
1. Boot Camp still shows NTFS partitions as selections using Paragon NTFS for Mac. (They disappear under NTFS-3g.)
2. My NTFS drives are just a tiny bit faster using Paragon under OS X than under Windows itself. (NTFS-3g stable release without ublio caching was too slow to be acceptable for me. With ublio, it's "fast enough" but still about half the speed of Paragon.)
3. No goofy shutdown/unmount issues with Paragon. (Read the
current NTFS-3g for Mac OS X blog and check out the 30 second shutdown problems and the request of the developer that you unmount all NTFS volumes before shutdown to avoid terminating NTFS support while file system structures are still being updated.)
4. Disk Utility supports NTFS volumes for "Repair Disk" using Paragon. (NTFS-3g for Mac had too much trouble with it and right now does nothing if you ask it to "Repair Disk", the developer recommends hooking NTFS drives to Windows PCs in case of issues.)
5. Transparent support for NTFS drives, looks and feels like the Apple read-only NTFS driver just with read-write support. (NTFS-3g mounts NTFS volumes as network drives, with unmount gadgets on them.)
6. Filenames with international characters work correctly with Paragon. (Again, read the NTFS-3g blog. No idea why they work under the Apple read-only driver and Paragon read-write driver but they cannot be made to work with NTFS-3g for Mac, the NTFS-3g Mac developer blames a Finder issue.)
If you paid for Paragon, and it doesn't work for you, you should contact them as part of what you pay for with commercial software is support. I've only used their support once, but they were responsive and solved my issue quickly.
I've nothing against NTFS-3g, and used to use it when it was the only game in town and am glad to see that a Mac developer exists again for it as there was a long period of time when no one maintained a Mac release. But for me, Paragon is better.