Not at all, it will only run an ARM build of Windows. However, the ARM build of Windows will run the majority of X86 and X64 apps. So you shouldn’t have much trouble there.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Parallels tech preview for M1
- Thread starter faffoo
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not at all, it will only run an ARM build of Windows. However, the ARM build of Windows will run the majority of X86 and X64 apps. So you shouldn’t have much trouble there.
That's pretty amazing. I have installed it and it works quite well. The issues I am seeing:
- The pointer moves too slowly, even when adjusted to its highest speed
- Can't install .NET framework (it keeps failing)
- Some games will run, but you can only see 25% of the game's zoomed-in screen
I am reading this information for the first time.
Windows for arm, can really run x86-x64 software?
If this is true, then we can the usual windows application in new apple silicon macs, with parallels, without limitations, as it was all the previous years?
Kinda. Mostly it works; some application may still be incompatible. So you may take the „without limitations“ part with several grains of salt
Anyone have issues installing the Parallels Technical Preview itself? I've downloaded it from Parallels website, I open the .dmg, launch the Install Parallels Desktop app, there's a dialogue to say it is "Downloading Parallels Desktop"
then a dialog saying "Installing Parallels Desktop" and I get a spinning beach ball..... and then that's it, nothing else happens.
(Is it not happy that I already have CrossOver installed?
)
Edit: nevermind: updated Big Sur with the 11.3 beta 7 and now it installs as normal.
then a dialog saying "Installing Parallels Desktop" and I get a spinning beach ball..... and then that's it, nothing else happens.
(Is it not happy that I already have CrossOver installed?
)Edit: nevermind: updated Big Sur with the 11.3 beta 7 and now it installs as normal.
Last edited:
Yes, but YMMV. I’ve tried current versions of CCleaner and PerfectDisk, and neither work. PerfectDisk at least opens, but there’s a weird extension error preventing it from running, and CCLeaner doesn’t even open. But then I’ve also installed an older version of Acid Pro from CD-Rom and it works great! The way Microsoft is getting them to work in Windows is similar to how Rosetta 2 works, but doesn’t work nearly as well. I’ve tried a handful of VERY old apps I’ve kept installers for, most of them have worked.
What you observe is not a bug in the emulator but rather a general limitation. Microsoft is very explicit about this:
- Drivers for hardware, games and apps will only work if they're designed for a Windows 10 ARM-based PC.
- Apps that customize the Windows experience might have problems.
- Some third-party antivirus software can’t be installed.
In summary, kernel drivers and SW, which rely on special kernel interfaces are not covered by emulation. I believe these limitation are also given for Rosetta 2 - as you cannot install kernel drivers or kernel extension if they do not match target architecture under MacOS either.
Both Rosetta and Windows emulation of Intel architecture is efficient because the drivers and UX are accessed via native interfaces. In Rosetta2 the apps actually use the Frameworks written for Apple Silicon. In comparison, complete emulations as was done in VirtualPC on PowerPC was perceptually and practically glacial.
It is possible for Parallel's to have full Intel translation/emulation in the shipping version, but do not expect to significantly exceed what Qemu-86 does now - interesting intellectually but not usable.
It is possible for Parallel's to have full Intel translation/emulation in the shipping version, but do not expect to significantly exceed what Qemu-86 does now - interesting intellectually but not usable.
There are some problems, but overall, it works. It's pretty amazing. Adobe CS6 installs and works without issues. A number of Steam games, too.
Without limitations would be a stretch unfortunately. There’s still quite a bit of incompatibility with Windows ARM emulating X86/64. That’s not a Parallels issue, though there will be those of course. But even running on a Surface with ARM, there’s a fair way to go with compatibility. But it’s getting there.
The official release of Parallels 16.5.0 ends the Preview. Just upgraded and validated my Activation. A keeper leaving VMware in the dust.
I've had nothing but a positive experience thru the entire Tech Preview. I hope any feedback I submitted contributed in their development...
Same here. Not that they actually support the "unsupported" Mac Pro Classic (5,1) under Big Sur, which was dropped by VMware forcing the Hypervisor, while still supporting Catalina with their extension. I switched at that time.
Still bringing my whole inventory of VMs over to the new platform on the Intel systems.
Hey, looks like this article may help you to decide.
If you do that, when you launch it on the second machine, you get a message saying "this license is in use on another machine, do you want to use it to activate this machine?" ....or similar words.
I don't know if there is a limit on how many times you could switch this way. Adobe works the same way and I have read that there is no limit on how often.
So just to be clear you can now upgrade (or buy a new licence) for Parallels but there is no news on the Windows 10 ARM version.
Is that where we're at?
Is that where we're at?
Yes that's right and there is a limit on how many times you can switch - 6 or something similar - but Parallels will reset your license count if this happens. We had a high turnover of machines at one point and this was the case for me.
Correct.
Its still the insider preview version of Windows you need to download. Which seems slightly nuts to me....
Is that email sent out only to existing customers, or is a generic coupon code? I'm looking to sign up myself.