Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not much to shoot but snow:

gcr1.jpg
 
Critique appreciated :)

Beach%20Debris.jpg

My thoughts…the lighting and colours are very good but the shot is lacking interest or a dramatic flair.

If your subject is the overall scene, my eyes zero in on the log and then stop and the rest is lost. I suggest having everything in focus including the rocks out in the water. You would also want the log positioned so that it's pointing outwards to create a leading line that draws your gaze further into the frame. But then you need something out there for your eyes to rest on once they get out into the frame. A person sitting on the rocks or standing in the surf and looking out to the horizon would be cool.

If your subject is the log itself, a tighter composition that eliminates the background hills and just about everything else would be good. This would include the colour, texture and character of the knotted (right) end of the log against the smooth wet sand taken at a low angle (nothing else in the frame). If the sand is wet enough and the light is right, you might even get lucky to catch some reflection of the log.

That's my theory anyway. ;)

~ Peter
 
Posted something similar about a year ago. Shot it again, this time on a tripod. Kept it in color rather than converting to B&W.

The reason I decided to shoot it again is that I find it to be an ambiguous subject without many visual cues that causes my brain to interpret it in several different ways. In reality, it's a corner of my bedroom. But the perspective creates an optical illusion where it can also be seen as the corner of a box.

More abstractly it can be seen as a human pelvis (the physician in me talking). I actually see it as a pelvis in two very different ways.

I see all of these "versions" of the photo whenever I look at it. Makes it visually interesting for me.

12215622733_c29607e9e4_c.jpg


Here is a snap of my bedroom showing the corner in question.

12216399835_c626d32895.jpg
 
Last edited:
The reason I decided to shoot it again is that I find it to be an ambiguous subject without many visual cues that causes my brain to interpret it in several different ways. In reality, it's a corner of my bedroom. But the perspective creates an optical illusion where it can also be seen as the corner of a box.

Interesting.
Convex-concave?
 
Posted something similar about a year ago. Shot it again, this time on a tripod. Kept it in color rather than converting to B&W.

The reason I decided to shoot it again is that I find it to be an ambiguous subject without many visual cues that causes my brain to interpret it in several different ways. In reality, it's a corner of my bedroom. But the perspective creates an optical illusion where it can also be seen as the corner of a box.

More abstractly it can be seen as a human pelvis (the physician in me talking). I actually see it as a pelvis in two very different ways.

I see all of these "versions" of the photo whenever I look at it. Makes it visually interesting for me.

12215622733_c29607e9e4_c.jpg


Here is a snap of my bedroom showing the corner in question.

Image

The image is like a painting, very open to interpretation. The uneven surface is quite reminiscent of the brush strokes. And while you as a physician see human pelvis, the rest of us just see a crotch :) On a more serious note, the only thing I found a bit distracting was the blur in the upper left corner, not sure if intentional.

______________________

Another snap from a warmer time for today. I was shooting this with a GoPro, so had to guess framing. It was shot from a small cove you cannot get to by land, so my "real" camera did not go there. In retrospect I would have included the full view of snorkelling googles at the bottom, but it is what it is.


Firopotamus, Milos by FriskyFreeze, on Flickr
 
Awesome structure!

Looks like meringue, makes me hungry ;)

I'd be curious to stick around and see how it looked under different light.

Well, it's in my backyard so I guess I did stick around. Took a quick pic today, but didn't turn out very well.

sdje.jpg
 
The image is like a painting, very open to interpretation. The uneven surface is quite reminiscent of the brush strokes. And while you as a physician see human pelvis, the rest of us just see a crotch :) On a more serious note, the only thing I found a bit distracting was the blur in the upper left corner, not sure if intentional.

Thanks for the kind words :)

The blur on the left crosses the line between intentional and necessary. While the perspective of the shot makes it seem like everything was in roughly the same plane, that isn't the case. To get the right perspective on the different lines in the image I had to shoot at an angle/perspective where everything couldn't be in focus, even when stopped down.

Regarding the crotch...

I see it in two very different perspectives. I asked my wife to look at the photo and she saw it in the same two ways. She loves this image and likes it in color specifically because it makes the "crotch" aspect more obvious.

Human pelvis #1
For this the viewpoint is from directly above with the legs extended. The diagonal lines represent where the thighs meet the pelvis. The vertical line represents the two thighs meeting--their medial aspects coming together.

Human pelvis #2
For this the viewpoint is now looking at a woman with her legs up in stirrups for a gynecologic exam. The diagonal lines are the medial aspects of the thighs. The vertical line is the perineum. You can imagine arcs added around the vertical line to represent the labia majora/minora.

Because of the ambiguity, I see all of these when I look at the photo. I can blink causing my brain to do a reset and what I see changes.

Probably too much information. But one of the reasons this photo is so interesting to me (and my wife!).
 
Last edited:
Really nice. I'm loving these contrasty black and whites of yours.

Thanks, MacRy. Here's another. A different POV for one I posted recently. This one is a single frame, single exposure, worked on in Photoshop with lots of gradient masks and other treatments for lots of bits of this picture. This is a building I will be revisiting for all manner of differing light conditions and POV's of.


Elder, Smith and Co., Limited 02 by playswithlight, on Flickr

----------


Fantastic detail and light to this one! I swear I'm there. :cool:
 
Thanks Ish...glad you like it.

  • Nikon D600
  • 80-400mm VRII lens at 310mm
  • Aperture priority at f/5.6
  • 1/320 sec.
  • ISO 400
  • about 20ft from the bird
For birds, I'm usually at ISO 400 as a minimum. With hindsight, given the overcast day, I should have used a higher ISO to get my shutter speed up to at least 1/500 as I can see a tiny bit of motion blur in the sparrow. In this case, I wouldn't have wanted a shutter speed that's too fast as I do like the blur of the snow. It's a fine line between the two that's determined by trial and error and a whole lot of luck.

The other thing I did that day was to use an external flash set on manual at 1/128 or 1/64 (somewhere around there) of full power. On very overcast days, I will occasionally use a flash on low power just to add a bit of fill and a light catchment in the eye. In this case, I didn't get the catchment which leads me to think that I may have been messing with a diffuser or just didn't have the power high enough for the distance. It's another thing with a fine line between the two that's determined by trial and error and luck. Too little flash makes no difference and too much results in very odd lighting for wildlife.

~ Peter

Thanks Peter! I actually like to see motion blur in a photo like this and feel it brings it alive. I'd be happy if there was more. As long as the log is sharp, seeing a blur of a little sparrow and snow going everywhere sounds like a fun photo. :) Thanks for sharing how you do it!

We actually had some snow today, but sadly it didn't settle :mad:

More than here then. Our rain turned slightly to sleet for a couple of minutes and faded away.
 
Human pelvis #1
For this the viewpoint is from directly above with the legs extended. The diagonal lines represent where the thighs meet the pelvis. The vertical line represents the two thighs meeting--their medial aspects coming together.

Human pelvis #2
For this the viewpoint is now looking at a woman with her legs up in stirrups for a gynecologic exam. The diagonal lines are the medial aspects of the thighs. The vertical line is the perineum. You can imagine arcs added around the vertical line to represent the labia majora/minora.

I really should start paying more attention to the shots posted here...all I saw was the corner of a ceiling / corner of a box. What have I been missing all this time? :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.