Shooting with film and scanning the negative with a DSLR for the first time, much to learn... 

Kodak Ultramax 400 por Daniela M Alves, no Flickr

Kodak Ultramax 400 por Daniela M Alves, no Flickr
Not much to shoot but snow:
![]()
A quaint little modernist building I found last week in Port Adelaide, South Australia.
[url=http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7438/12163072174_4983d5daa1_c.jpg]Image[/url]
Quaint by playswithlight, on Flickr
I know others are more accustom to the white stuff, but it is a rare event for us.
[url=http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7411/12211844664_fb21331190_b.jpg]Image[/url]
GLS_3900 - Version 2 by wwsakall, on Flickr
The reason I decided to shoot it again is that I find it to be an ambiguous subject without many visual cues that causes my brain to interpret it in several different ways. In reality, it's a corner of my bedroom. But the perspective creates an optical illusion where it can also be seen as the corner of a box.
Posted something similar about a year ago. Shot it again, this time on a tripod. Kept it in color rather than converting to B&W.
The reason I decided to shoot it again is that I find it to be an ambiguous subject without many visual cues that causes my brain to interpret it in several different ways. In reality, it's a corner of my bedroom. But the perspective creates an optical illusion where it can also be seen as the corner of a box.
More abstractly it can be seen as a human pelvis (the physician in me talking). I actually see it as a pelvis in two very different ways.
I see all of these "versions" of the photo whenever I look at it. Makes it visually interesting for me.
![]()
Here is a snap of my bedroom showing the corner in question.
Image
Awesome structure!
Looks like meringue, makes me hungry
I'd be curious to stick around and see how it looked under different light.
The image is like a painting, very open to interpretation. The uneven surface is quite reminiscent of the brush strokes. And while you as a physician see human pelvis, the rest of us just see a crotchOn a more serious note, the only thing I found a bit distracting was the blur in the upper left corner, not sure if intentional.
Really nice. I'm loving these contrasty black and whites of yours.
Thanks Ish...glad you like it.
For birds, I'm usually at ISO 400 as a minimum. With hindsight, given the overcast day, I should have used a higher ISO to get my shutter speed up to at least 1/500 as I can see a tiny bit of motion blur in the sparrow. In this case, I wouldn't have wanted a shutter speed that's too fast as I do like the blur of the snow. It's a fine line between the two that's determined by trial and error and a whole lot of luck.
- Nikon D600
- 80-400mm VRII lens at 310mm
- Aperture priority at f/5.6
- 1/320 sec.
- ISO 400
- about 20ft from the bird
The other thing I did that day was to use an external flash set on manual at 1/128 or 1/64 (somewhere around there) of full power. On very overcast days, I will occasionally use a flash on low power just to add a bit of fill and a light catchment in the eye. In this case, I didn't get the catchment which leads me to think that I may have been messing with a diffuser or just didn't have the power high enough for the distance. It's another thing with a fine line between the two that's determined by trial and error and luck. Too little flash makes no difference and too much results in very odd lighting for wildlife.
~ Peter
We actually had some snow today, but sadly it didn't settle![]()
Human pelvis #1
For this the viewpoint is from directly above with the legs extended. The diagonal lines represent where the thighs meet the pelvis. The vertical line represents the two thighs meeting--their medial aspects coming together.
Human pelvis #2
For this the viewpoint is now looking at a woman with her legs up in stirrups for a gynecologic exam. The diagonal lines are the medial aspects of the thighs. The vertical line is the perineum. You can imagine arcs added around the vertical line to represent the labia majora/minora.