heyyy!! you came back! 🙂
also, 85mm is an interesting choice for a museum. i like it. (my inclination would have been wider.)
heyyy!! you came back! 🙂
I also have the 25 1.4. It’s a great lens!View attachment 1945554
Olympus e-m5 panaleica 25f1.4
fire hydrant, Las Canteras, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
What a treasure to have this picture from a One MP cameraVictoria Terminus, Mumbai, 2001. Taken with a One Megapixel Canon Digital Ixus. Bad photo? Yep. Back then photography was just pointing at things at random and I had little idea of things like composition. At least I caught a taxi in the image. I had one hour (each direction) roller coaster taxi ride from my hotel to the office every day. If I was lucky, the taxi would be an air conditioned "Cool Cab".
Third Mumbai Visit 008 by Jason Hindle, on Flickr
Interesting - Is that person jumping onto sand?View attachment 1945554
Olympus e-m5 panaleica 25f1.4
fire hydrant, Las Canteras, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Yes. strange what boys get up to, about a one foot drop from the walkway to the sand. !!!Interesting - Is that person jumping onto sand?
The FF camera and 85mm lens worked well this time (no significant image distortion of the subject's face).heyyy!! you came back! ?
also, 85mm is an interesting choice for a museum. i like it. (my inclination would have been wider.)
well right, 85 is ideal for a portrait. ? i just meant if i’d packed my camera to go to a museum i’d take something like a 35 so i could photograph the inside of the building. it wouldn’t occur to me to take portraits inside.The FF camera and 85mm lens worked well this time (no significant image distortion of the subject's face).