Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jz0309

Contributor
Sep 25, 2018
11,382
30,026
SoCal
there's quite a bit of air traffic over my place, this is a 787 going from Tokyo to Mexico City at 41,000 ft (flightradar24.com), significantly cropped but no other edits, 6DMkII w/100-400
IMG_4113.jpg
 

kallisti

macrumors 68000
Apr 22, 2003
1,751
6,670
2016. Kansas City. I think I posted this here before (can't remember). Went back and edited it again, specifically taking the time to clone out all the floating debris that distract from the subject (there was quite a bit). Prior to considering it for printing these little imperfections didn't bother me too much. But if I'm going to be looking at the image every day they would drive me bonkers :).

48333457782_a65b98c0f1_b.jpg
 

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Feb 21, 2012
56,999
56,024
Behind the Lens, UK
Out canoeing and couldn't resist this setup.
View attachment 849272
I can see why.
[doublepost=1563717989][/doublepost]
Beautiful.
[doublepost=1563718023][/doublepost]
Something floral. Agapanthus I believe.


Palace of Arts
by another scotsman, on Flickr
No idea but it’s pretty.
[doublepost=1563718096][/doublepost]
2016. Kansas City. I think I posted this here before (can't remember). Went back and edited it again, specifically taking the time to clone out all the floating debris that distract from the subject (there was quite a bit). Prior to considering it for printing these little imperfections didn't bother me too much. But if I'm going to be looking at the image every day they would drive me bonkers :).

48333457782_a65b98c0f1_b.jpg
Good job. Aquarium shooting is tricky. I brought a rubber lens hood to try once but still struggled.
[doublepost=1563718128][/doublepost]
Where’s the bee?
[doublepost=1563718158][/doublepost]
Something abstract. From the hotel in San Francisco that reportedly provided inspiration for Hitchcock's film Vertigo. Comments always appreciated.


Vertigo
by another scotsman, on Flickr
Nice monochrome.
 

Hughmac

macrumors 603
Original poster
Feb 4, 2012
6,001
32,567
Kent, UK
We spent a long day out yesterday visiting various locations - this is the now defunct Port Of Ramsgate in Kent, a place I have visited many times in an official capacity to deal with freight ferries from across the Channel.



Sony RX100M6, 1/2000 @ f/5.6, processed with PhotoShop CS3 on a PowerBook G4.

Cheers :)

Hugh
 
Last edited:

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,425
48,339
Tanagra (not really)
We spent a long day out yesterday visiting various locations - this is the now defunct Port Of Ramsgate in Kent, a place I have visited many times in an official capacity to deal with freight ferries from across the Channel.



Sony RX100M6, 1/2000 @ f/5.6, processed with PhotoShop CS3 on a PowerBook G4.

Cheers :)

Hugh
PowerBook G4?
 

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,425
48,339
Tanagra (not really)
In my sig ;)
I love the simplicity of Leopard so I am using the PowerBook (1.67GHz) for most things at the moment.

Cheers :)

Hugh

Just seems like it would be pretty sluggish for most things anymore. Since core and several architectures ago! Then again, my current rig is a 4,1 Mac Pro, but it's been tricked out with a W3690 and RX 580.

P1000590.jpg
 
Last edited:

Hughmac

macrumors 603
Original poster
Feb 4, 2012
6,001
32,567
Kent, UK
Just seems like it would be pretty sluggish for most things anymore. Since core and several architectures ago! Then again, my current rig is a 4,1 Mac Pro, but it's been tricked out with a W3690 and RX 580.
It's a challenge getting everything running smoothly, and of course it is slow (even with an SSD and maximum RAM) compared to my 2012 MacBook Pro, but I'm enjoying the experience with the invaluable assistance of the PowerPC forum - https://forums.macrumors.com/forums/powerpc-macs.145/

Cheers :)

Hugh
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darmok N Jalad

Darmok N Jalad

macrumors 603
Sep 26, 2017
5,425
48,339
Tanagra (not really)
It's a challenge getting everything running smoothly, and of course it is slow (even with an SSD and maximum RAM) compared to my 2012 MacBook Pro, but I'm enjoying the experience with the invaluable assistance of the PowerPC forum - https://forums.macrumors.com/forums/powerpc-macs.145/

Cheers :)

Hugh
Yes, the Mac hardware forum is great here. It’s actually what brought me to Macrumors in the first place! I bought the cMP 4,1 and learned how to flash it to 5,1 and then pick the best CPU upgrade it would accept. I’m a big fan of getting use out of old gear. It’s the geek equivalent of fixing up a classic car. :cool:
 

kallisti

macrumors 68000
Apr 22, 2003
1,751
6,670
[doublepost=1563718096][/doublepost]
Good job. Aquarium shooting is tricky. I brought a rubber lens hood to try once but still struggled.

Thanks. Yes, it can be a nightmare. Pretty much everything is working against you in a photographic sense. Low light, so you really need an open aperture (f/2.8 at a minimum, ideally f/1.4). Most of the fish are moving quickly, so 1/125th sec at a minimum and it can require a faster shutter speed to freeze motion like 1/250th sec (or even faster). The combination means that the ISO is going to have to creep up to fairly high levels which will mean noise and loss of sharpness. Good luck exposing to the right ;).

Focus can also be problematic since the fish are moving so quickly and the low light can throw off some AF modules. Related to this is the lack of depth of field you will see with an open aperture. Subject isolation can be fantastic for some subjects, but in an aquarium you often desire a decent DOF to get multiple swimming fish in focus, the whole fish if that is the subject, or the fish and the background to give a sense of place. f/8-f/11 aren't options in an aquarium setting.

Then throw in reflections from ambient light unless you hold the lens right up next to the glass (as you alluded to). Plus dirty glass and crap floating around in the tank.

"Tricky" is an understatement :). It can be quite frustrating. Made worse by the fact that many of the exhibits can seem so photogenic. You take pics of what looks awesome only to be disappointed when reviewing the files later.

I got very lucky with the pic I posted. 24-70mm zoom @ 24mm. 1/125th sec @ f/2.8 and ISO 6400. There is noise in the file, but I was able to deal with it in post to acceptable levels.

I'm actually thinking about taking my GoPro with me as my camera the next time I visit an aquarium. Its 3mm lens results in a massive DOF even wide open at f/2.8. Not sure how well it will handle the low light. Will have to experiment and see.
 
Last edited:

kallisti

macrumors 68000
Apr 22, 2003
1,751
6,670
Sharing a miss from 2008. This was taken on a trip to Hawaii. Taken with a D300 and 18-200 lens. At the time I was a huge fan of Ken Rockwell. I thought his site was the bee's knees. His review prompted me to get the 18-200. His site also made me think that it was okay to shoot JPEG instead of RAW. I believed him when he said there was no reason to shoot RAW. I also followed his advice to increase the saturation of the JPEG preset. The results from the trip made me seriously question his advice and was the turning point where I started shooting RAW.

While the following pic isn't great, it serves as an example of what ended up going wrong for most of the pics on the trip. The image isn't overexposed, but the red channel is completely blown out. This is a direct result of shooting in JPEG with the saturation bumped up in the preset. The JPEG might have been usable with the JPEG preset at more "neutral" levels. But my takeaway from the trip was to shoot everything as RAW and spend the time in post to get the image how I want it. In 2008, storage was a concern and I can see how shooting JPEG had some practical advantages compared to RAW regarding storage. Not the case in 2019. Shoot RAW if your camera is capable. Gives you more options in post now and in the future if you ever revisit your images.

48343650692_61bc223e3f_b.jpg
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.